Satendra Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 25 June, 2025

0
1


Patna High Court – Orders

Satendra Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 25 June, 2025

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                            CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90161 of 2024
                      Arising out of PS. Case No.-391 Year-2024 Thana- WAJIRGANJ District- Gaya
                 ======================================================
                 Satendra Kumar, Son of Late Amir Singh, Resident of Village - Beranti, P.S. -
                 Deepnagar, District - Nalanda, Bihar Sharif

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                                                        with
                             CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 4842 of 2025
                      Arising out of PS. Case No.-391 Year-2024 Thana- WAJIRGANJ District- Gaya
                 ======================================================
                 Abhishek Kumar, Son of Satyendra Narayan Singh @ Satyendra Narayan, vil-
                 lage- Bhawani Bigha P.S- Silao Dist- Nalanda

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 90161 of 2024)
                 For the Petitioner/s    : Mr. Ravi Ranjan Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s: Mr. Raj Kishor Singh, APP
                 (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 4842 of 2025)
                 For the Petitioner/s    : Mr. Ansul, Senior Advocate
                                           Mr. Aditya Raj Singh, Advocate
                                           Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advocate
                                           Mr. Pratyush, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s: Mr. Jagdhar Prasad, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   25-06-2025

Heard Mr. Ansul, learned senior counsel for the peti-

tioner namely Abhishek Kumar and Mr. Ravi Ranjan Kumar,

learned counsel for the petitioner namely Satendra Kumar and

Mr. Raj Kishor Singh and Mr. Jagdhar Prasad, learned Addi-

tional Public Prosecutors for the state.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90161 of 2024(4) dt.25-06-2025
2/5

2. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the

offences under Sections 20/22(c) of NDPS Act. Petitioner

namely Satendra Kumar has one criminal antecedent, i.e., Be-

gusarai Rail P.S. Case 9 of 2017 of NDPS Act and Petitioner

namely Abhishek Kumar has one criminal antecedent, i.e., Silao

P.S. Case No. 60 of 2022 registered under Sections 147, 149,

341, 323, 325, 307 and 505 IPC.

3. As per the prosecution case, on secret information

two persons were apprehended who tried to flee, however, they

were chased and apprehended and they disclosed their names as

Satendra Kumar and Abhishek Kumar and on search total 9.5

Kgs. Ganja was recovered from the trolley belonging to the peti-

tioner namely Satendra Kumar and 12 Kgs Ganja was recovered

from the trolley belonging to the petitioner namely Abhishek

Kumar.

4. Learned senior counsel for the petitioners submits

that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case and

admittedly the narcotic substance was kept on the top of the

tempo and was not recovered from the conscious physical pos-

session of the petitioners. It is further submitted by learned se-

nior counsel for the petitioners that petitioners have falsely been

implicated in this case at the behest of the police and seizure
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90161 of 2024(4) dt.25-06-2025
3/5

was not prepared under the prescribed provisions of NDPS Act.

It is lastly submitted by learned senior counsel for the petition-

ers that the petitioners have one criminal antecedent and they

are in custody since 18.06.2024.

5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutors for the State

have vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioners

and have submitted that two persons were apprehended with

Ganja and jointly it would amount to commercial quantity as

such they should not be released on bail.

6. Considering the aforesaid submissions of learned

counsels and taking into account the individual recovery of

Ganja from the petitioners and the period of custody, the peti-

tioners above named, are directed to be released on bail on fur-

nishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each

with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

the learned Special Judge/Additional Sessions Judge 17 th, Gaya

or the Court concerned in connection with Wazirganj P.S. Case

No. 391 of 2024, subject to the the following conditions:-

(i) One of the bailors will be a

close relative of the petitioners.

(ii) The petitioners will remain

present on each and every date fixed by the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90161 of 2024(4) dt.25-06-2025
4/5

Court below, if so required by the learned Trial

Court.

(iii) In case of absence on two con-

secutive dates or in violation of the terms of the

bail, the bail bond of the petitioners will be li-

able to be canceled by the Court concerned.

(iv) And further condition that the

court below shall verify the criminal antecedent

of the petitioners except above-mentioned one

case and in case at any stage it is found that the

petitioners have concealed their criminal an-

tecedents except above-mentioned one case, the

court below shall take step for cancellation of

bail bond of the petitioners. However, the ac-

ceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-

mentioned order shall not be delayed for pur-

pose of the same or in the name of verification.

7. In view of the antecedents of the petitioners, the

petitioners are directed to appear before the Superintendent of

Police, Gaya within fifteen days of their release with a copy of

this order and every two weeks thereafter for the next nine

months. The conduct of the petitioners will be kept under watch
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90161 of 2024(4) dt.25-06-2025
5/5

in this period by the Superintendent of Police concerned and if it

is found wanting in any respect, a report shall be made to the

court concerned by him to initiate a proceeding for cancellation

of bail for reasons of misuse of bail. After reporting to the Su-

perintendent of Police, a certificate will be filed by the petition-

ers before the court concerned.

8. It is made clear that the observations, if any, made

in this order, shall be of no bearing during the trial.

(Sourendra Pandey, J)
Vikash/-

U      T
 



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here