Satish Kumar Garg vs Munish Garg on 18 June, 2025

Supreme Court – Daily Orders

Satish Kumar Garg vs Munish Garg on 18 June, 2025

                                                       1

     ITEM NO.24                               COURT NO.12                 SECTION IV-B

                                    S U P R E M E C O U R T O F      I N D I A
                                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

              Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)              No(s).     16799/2025

     [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 29-05-2025
     in CM No. 11170/2025 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana
     at Chandigarh]

     SATISH KUMAR GARG                                                    Petitioner(s)

                                                     VERSUS

     MUNISH GARG                                                          Respondent(s)

     IA No. 146693/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED
     JUDGMENT

Date : 18-06-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASANNA B. VARALE

(PARTIAL COURT WORKING DAYS BENCH)

For Petitioner(s) :

Mr. Arman Roop Sharma, Adv.

Ms. Shimpy Sharma, Adv.

Mr. Mohd. Aman Khan Afghani, Adv.

Mr. Amit Bhardwaj, Adv.

Mr. Piyush Sardana, Adv.

Dr. Vinod Kumar Tewari, AOR

For Respondent(s) :

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R

1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.

2. The petitioner preferred an application under
Signature Not Verified
Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 before
Digitally signed by
NISHA KHULBEY
Date: 2025.06.19
10:31:04 IST
Reason: the High Court seeking extension of time to vacate the

demised premises in terms of the Order dated 22.04.2025

passed by the High Court in CR No. 2379 of 2025. The said
2

order was passed by the High Court on a concession given

by the petitioner (who was present in the Court) that he

would vacate the demised premises within two months from

the said date. However, in view of certain intervening

circumstances, the petitioner felt a dire need for

extension of time to vacate the demised premises on

which, the subject application was filed which has been

dismissed by the High Court vide Order dated 29.05.2025.

3. Having heard and considered the submissions advanced

by the learned counsel for the petitioner, and in the

interest of justice, we hereby grant three months further

time to the petitioner from 22.06.2025 to vacate the

demised premises in question. This indulgence is being

granted subject to the condition that the petitioner

shall pay double the rent as assessed by the Courts

below, to the respondent till the vacation of the demised

premises. The petitioner shall furnish usual undertaking

before the Trial Court within two weeks from today.

4. The special leave petition is disposed of

accordingly.

5. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand closed.

   (NISHA KHULBEY)                                          (SAPNA BANSAL)
SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT                                 COURT MASTER (NSH)