Satvinder Singh Bhatia vs The State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors on 1 August, 2025

0
32

CAV ORDER

1. Since common question of law and facts are involved in these writ petitions,

they are heard analogously and being disposed off by this common order.

2. The petitioners have filed the writ petitions assailing the orders dated

13.08.2001 by which the Assistant Commissioner (Excise), Bilaspur has

demanded recovery of import duty on foreign liquor which was transported

after obtaining No Objection Certificates from him.

3. The brief facts as projected by the petitioners are that:

A. The petitioners are dealing with manufacture and distribution of

foreign liquor. They were granted license in prescribed form FL-10 by

Excise Commissioner, erstwhile State of Madhya Pradesh for a period

from 1.4.2000 to 31.3.2001. Condition No.4 specifically stated that “the

licensee shall import and transport foreign liquor after paying the

prescribed import fee or the transport fee, as the case may be”. The

petitioners pursuant to the license transported Spirit & Malt (Foreign

liquor and beer) from various places within the erstwhile State of Madhya

Pradesh and also outside the State during the validity of the license. As

per the provisions contained in the Excise Act and the Madhya Pradesh

Foreign Liquor Rules 1996, the petitioners were required to pre-pay the

import duty on spirit and malt which were transported by them from

outside the State and then only no objection certificates in the prescribed

Form FL-21 were issued to them. On that basis petitioners used to

transport the foreign liquor, there was no duty imposed on them on the

spirit and malt which they transported within the territory of undevided

Madhya Pradesh i.e. as it was before 1/11/2000 except Rs.25/- which

was paid as transport fee by way of Treasury Challan.

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here