Satyam Dayal Singh @ Manahar Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 30 August, 2025

0
5

Patna High Court – Orders

Satyam Dayal Singh @ Manahar Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 30 August, 2025

Author: Nawneet Kumar Pandey

Bench: Nawneet Kumar Pandey

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67885 of 2024
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-145 Year-2024 Thana- PATLIPUTRA District- Patna
                 ======================================================
                 Satyam Dayal Singh @ Manahar Kumar S/o Devi Dayal Singh Resident of
                 Village- Sattar, Post- Sarai, PS- Maner, District- Patna

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar Bihar
           2.    Sangli Kumar @ Sangli Devi W/o Satyam Dayal Singh @ Manhar, D/o
                 Avinash Kumar Singh R/o Gate no. 49, South Lane, Murti Makan, P.S. -
                 Patliputra, Distt. - Patna

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Nalin Kumar, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Shailendra Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR
                 PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

7   30-08-2025

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as

learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection

with Patliputra P.S. Case No. 145 of 2024, registered for the

offences punishable under Sections 323, 313, 386, 504, 494,

498A of the IPC.

3. According to the allegation, the complainant, who

is wife of the petitioner, was tortured for non-fulfillment of

dowry demand. It has further been alleged that the petitioner has

solemnized his second marriage.

4. In order to explore the possibility of restoration of

conjugal life of the parties, the matter was referred to the Patna
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67885 of 2024(7) dt.30-08-2025
2/2

High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre. However,

neither the petitioner was ready to keep the victim, nor the

victim is willing to reside with the petitioner and the matter has

become irretrievable.

5. It has been submitted that both the parties want to

get their marriage dissolve through a decree of divorce on the

basis of mutual consent under Section 13B of Hindu Marriage

Act, 1955 and in this regard, a joint petition under Section 13B

has already been filed by the parties.

6. Considering the above-mentioned facts and

circumstances, let the petitioner, in the event of his arrest or

surrender within four weeks before the learned court below, be

released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.

10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M, Patna in connection

with Patliputra P.S. Case No. 145 of 2024 , subject to the

conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)

Kundan/-

U     T
 

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here