Sayed Sarfaraz @ Seemab Hussain @ Simab … vs The State Of Bihar on 14 July, 2025

0
1


at Hotel Windsor at the fixed time at 7:00 pm,

only 5 persons arrived as ‘baarati’ which was astonishing for

all the people present for the wedding, when it was informed

that a total of 25 persons would be there as baarat. It is

further alleged that when the Maulana performed the Nikkah,

the petitioner accepted the marriage but, when the Maulana

asked the petitioner and his father (accused No.2) to sign on

the Nikkahnama, they refused and were adamant that the

O.P. No. 2/complainant be sent to the petitioner and

demanded Rs. 10,00,000/- before signing Nikkahnama. The

family of the O.P. No. 2 refused the demands of the

petitioners, as the petitioner and O.P. No. 2 were not married,

since there was no sign on the Nikkahnama. The petitioner

along with other accused persons have fraudulently extracted

Rs. 5,00,000/- cash and the total expenses incurred in the

marriage amounting to Rs. 11,00,000/- from the family of

O.P. No.-2. The petitioner alongwith co-accused persons have

conspired together to cheat the O.P. No. 2 and have insulted
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58640 of 2024 dt.14-07-2025

them publicly in front of family and their friends. It is alleged

that expenses have been incurred by the father of O.P. No. 2,

who has travelled from Saudi Arabia and by her younger

brother also, who travelled from Chennai. It is further alleged

that petitioner had earlier married to a woman named Nafisa

and has two children from her, who he has left in her maternal

home. It is further alleged that the accused persons have

conspired to deceive O.P. No.2 on the pretext of marriage to

extract Rs. 11,00,000/- and have publicly insulted them in

front of their relatives and friends.



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here