Patna High Court – Orders
Shabnam Hasmi vs The State Of Bihar Through The Home … on 20 January, 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.65 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-788 Year-2022 Thana- BAGHA District- West Champaran
======================================================
SHABNAM HASMI Wife of Md. Ishaque Represent her ill husband
(Physically Paralysed namely Md. Ishaque) in capacity of A Legal Guardian,
R/V- Baltharba, P.O and P.S- Piprakothi in the Dist- of East champaran
presently posted as District Statistic Officer at Muzaffarpur (Bihar)
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Home Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna
2. The Director General of Police, Govt. of Bihar, Patna
3. The Inspector General of Police, Police Commissionary, Muzaffarpur
4. The Superintendent of Police, West Champaran, Bettiah
5. The Dy. Superintendent of Police, West Champaran, Bettiah
6. The Inspector of Police at Bagaha, West Champaran
7. The Station Head Officer (SHO) Bagaha (Patkhauli) P.S- Bettiah
8. The Investigation Officer (I.O) in Bagaha Patkhauli P.S- Case No. 788/2022
Bihar
9. The Bihar State Food & Civil Supply Corporation, Ltd., Patna
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shiv Shankar Prasad Yadav, Adv.
For the Respondent/s : Mr. Manish Kumar, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIBEK CHAUDHURI
ORAL ORDER
4 20-01-2025
The issue involved in the instant writ petition is as to
whether, registration of two F.I.Rs over the same incident,
violates Article 20 (2) of the Constitution of India, causing
double jeopardy to the accused.
2. The petitioner is the wife of accused. It is sufficient
to state that the husband of the petitioner was a Block Statistical
Officer in additional charge of the F.C.I. godown situated at
Patna High Court CR. WJC No.65 of 2023(4) dt.20-01-2025
2/7
Bagha-2, Block.
3. That on 8th October, 2018, Assistant District Supply
Officer, Bagha-1, lodged a written complaint against the
husband of the present petitioner, after investigation of stock
position of food grains in F.C.I. godown, situated at Bagha-1
and Bagha-2, Block and finding huge shortage of food grains.
The enquiry team found the following discrepancies:-
” 1- xsgwWa dh ek+=k LVkWd iath esa vafdr
ek=k ls 128 cSx vf/kd gSA
2- pkoy dh ek=k LVkWd iath esa vafdr
ek=k ls yxHkx 547 cSx de gSA
3- cxgk&2 iz[k.M eq[;ky; fLFkr
ch,l,Qlh xksnke la[;k&03 esa dkQh la[;k esa [kkyh
cSx ik;s x;sA izHkkjh lgk;d xksnke izca/kd ls iwNus ij
crk;k x;k fd ;s fjiSfdax ds fy, tks {kfrxzLr cSx dks
cnyus ds fy, fd;k tkrk gS] ijUrq HkkSfrd lk{;
ds :i esa ,sls [kk~|kUu ls Hkjs {kfrxzLr cSx ugh ik;s
x;s] ftls cnyuk gksA xksnke esa pkoy ds dqy 60 cSx
vkSj xsgwa ds 97 fjiSd cSx ik;s x;s gSA bldh vf/kd
la[;k otu esa cnyko vkSj feykoV dh vksj bafxr
djuk gSA
4- osbZax e’khu dh tkap ls Hkh mlesa
xM+cM+h ik;h xbZA ,d iqjkus 50 fd-xzk- ds yksgs ds
cV[kjs dk out csbZax e’khu }kjk 50 fd-xzk- fn[kyk;k
x;k] tcfd ml cV[kjs esa ekirkSy foHkkx dk dksbZ eqgj
vafdr ugha FkkA lkFk gh mlesa uhps ls Hkjk x;k /kkfRod
inkFkZ xk;c FkkA vr% otu ekih esa xM+cM+h ,oa
/kks[kk/kjh ls badkj ugha fd;k tk ldrk gSA
5- izHkkjh lgk;d xksnke izca/kd }kjk crk;k
Patna High Court CR. WJC No.65 of 2023(4) dt.20-01-2025
3/7x;k fd cxgk&1 fLFkr ch,l,Qlh xksnke esa o”kZ 2015
dk lM+k gqvk pkoy j[kk x;k gS] ftldh lwpuk
muds }kjk ,d i= }kjk ftyk izca/kd] jkT; [kk|
fuxe] csfr;k dks fn;k x;k gS] tks lafnX/k izrhr gksrk
gSA ml i= esa flQZ pkoy dk ftdz gS] tcfd cxgk&1
fLFkr xksnke esa [kjkc xsgWwa ds cgqr lkjs cSx iqjkus ,oa
fjiSd fd;s x;s ik;s x;sA mDr pkoy dh uhykeh ugha
fd;k tkuk ,oa mlds vfrfjDr xsgWwa dk fjiSfdax djkuk
lafnX/k xfrfof/k gSA bl lanHkZ esa iwNs tkus ij izHkkjh
lgk;d xksnke izca/kd }kjk dqN ugha crk;k x;kA
6- cxgk&1 fLFkr xksnke esa xsgWw ds cSx j[ks
tkus laca/kh dksbZ Hkh tokc izHkkjh lgk;d xksnke izca/kd
}kjk ugha fn;k x;kA mUgksaus mDr xksnke esa flQZ pkoy
gksus dh ckr dgha FkhA cxgk&2 fLFkr buds xksnke esa 8
cSx xsgwWa dk vf/kd iSdsV FkkA mUgksusa cryk;k fd o”kZ
2015 esa cxgk&1 esa dsoy [kjkc xq.koRrk okyk pkoy
j[kk x;k Fkk vkSj ml LVkWd iath esa ‘kkfey fd;k x;k
gSA ,slh ifjfLFkfr esa Li”V gS fd cxgk&1 fLFkr xksnke
esa lafpr ¼120 cSx½ xsgwW Hkh LVkWd iath esa ntZ gksaxsA
vFkkZr dqy xsgWw dk 120 +8 dqy 128 cSx LVkWd iath esa
vafdr ek=k ls vf/kd gSA
bl izdkj tkap izfrosnu esa xsgwW dh ek=k
128 cSx vf/kd ik;k tkuk] pkoy dh ek=k 547 cSx
de tk;k tkuk rFkk o”kZ 2015 ds lM+s gq;s pkoy dh
fuykeh ugha djk;k tkuk] rFkk xksnke esa j[ks gq;s 214
cksjs xsgWw ,oa pkoy dk feykoV dj fjiSfdax djk;k
tkuk Li”V djrk gS fd eks0 blgkd] iz[k.M lkaf[;dh
i;Zos{kd] cxgk&2 &lg& izHkkjh lgk;d xksnke izca/kd]
cxgk&2 }kjk dkykctkjh dh xbZ gSA”
4. After such enquiry, an F.I.R. was lodged against the
husband of the petitioner before the In-charge of Patkhauli
Patna High Court CR. WJC No.65 of 2023(4) dt.20-01-2025
4/7
Outpost. On the basis of the said complaint, Police registered a
case being Bagha P.S. Case NO. 499 of 2018, dated 10th
October, 2018, under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities
Act and Section 16 (1) (a) (ii) of the Prevention of Food
Adulteration Act, against the husband of the petitioner.
5. It was not the out of place to mention that against
the husband of the petitioner, a departmental proceeding was
initiated and he was compulsorily retired from his post. The
petitioner has also filed some medical documents to show that
her husband is suffering from paralysis and completely bed
ridden.
6. Subsequent to institution of the complaint case and
the departmental proceeding, another F.I.R. was lodged by the
District Manager, State Food Corporation alleging, inter alia,
that the husband of the petitioner was the In-charge of the
godown in question during the period between 30th May, 2012 to
6th October, 2018. During his tenure, he committed unintentional
loss/damage of the food-grains amounting to Rs. 28260275.56
(rice) and Rs. 16972089.37 (wheat), total being Rs.
4,52,32,364.93. On the basis of said F.I.R., Police registered
Bagha P.S. Case No. 788 of 2022, dated 11 th November, 2022,
under Sections 420/409/120(B) of the I.P.C.
Patna High Court CR. WJC No.65 of 2023(4) dt.20-01-2025
5/7
7. It is contended on behalf of the petitioner that both
the F.I.Rs relating to the same incident, in respect of one and
identical incident, two F.I.Rs cannot be lodged and institution of
two criminal cases against the husband of the petitioner violates
his constitutional right and double jeopardy, enunciated under
Article 20 (2) of the Constitution of India.
8. Both the State Government as well as the Food
Supply Corporation submitted their separate counter affidavits
alleging, inter alia, that both the cases are maintainable against
the petitioner.
9. Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act is a
penal for contravention of any order made under Section 3 of
the said Act. Section 3 speaks about powers to control
production, supply, distribution etc. of essential commodities.
Section 3 of the Essential Commodities Act imposes bounden
duty upon the godown In-charge to maintain stock of food-
grains. It is alleged that the husband of the petitioner did not
maintain the stock of the food-grains and during inspection huge
quantity of food-grains was found to be not in the said godown.
Violation of Section 3 of the Essential Commodities Act is
practically non-compliance of the official duty of the godown
In-charge. For such non-compliance, he is liable to be punished
Patna High Court CR. WJC No.65 of 2023(4) dt.20-01-2025
6/7
under Section 7 of the said Act.
10. On the contrary, Section 16 of the Prevention of
Food Adulteration Act is the penal provision against distribution
of any article of food, other than an article refers to Section 2 in
Sub-clause (1) in contravention of any of the provisions of this
Act or any Rule made thereunder. When it is found that there
was loss of huge quantity of food-grains from the godown
without any order of the concerned authority, Section 16 will
apply.
11. On the contrary, Section 420 and Section 409
operate absolutely on different criminal act/omission. Section
409 speaks about criminal breach of trust by different servant.
Criminal breach of trust is defined in section 405 of the I.P.C.
12. An In-charge of a godown of Food Supply
Corporation is entrusted with the food-grains. When it is found
that there was loss of food-grains, it is, prima facie, presumed
that it was dishonestly mis-appropriated by the husband of the
petitioner, who is a Government employee. The petitioner did
not contradict that the Government suffered a loss of more than
Rs. 4.52 Crores.
13. Section 420 of the I.P.C. is an offence of cheating.
It is for the Investigating Officer to prove that the husband of
Patna High Court CR. WJC No.65 of 2023(4) dt.20-01-2025
7/7
the petitioner had fraudulent or dishonest intention to dispose of
or deliver any property to any person and thereby cause
monetary damage to the Government, prima facie, ingredient of
Section 420 of the I.P.C. is said to be established.
14. Therefore, this Court is not in a position to hold
that by filing two F.I.Rs over the incident in hand, the husband
of the petitioner suffers double jeopardy. The similar view was
taken by a Co-ordiante Bench by this Court in Cr. W.J.C. No.
1960 of 2018 (M/s Jai Mata Di Mini Rice Mill Vrs. The State
of Bihar & Ors.), I do not find any reasons to take contrary
view in the instant criminal writ petition.
15. For the reasons stated above, the instant criminal
writ petition is dismissed on contest.
16. There shall be no order as to costs.
(Bibek Chaudhuri, J)
pravinkumar/-
U T
[ad_1]
Source link