Telangana High Court
Shaik Jaabir vs The State Of Telangana on 10 January, 2025
Author: Juvvadi Sridevi
Bench: Juvvadi Sridevi
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE JUVVADI SRIDEVI CRIMINAL PETITION No.16406 of 2024 O R D E R:
This Criminal Petition is filed by petitioner/accused
to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.275 of 2023 on the
file of learned Judicial First Class Magistrate,
Adilabad District. The offences alleged against
petitioner/accused are under Sections 270 and 273 of
Indian Penal Code (for short ‘IPC‘).
02. Heard Sri Soma Ravi Kiran Reddy, learned
counsel for the petitioner and Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla,
learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State-
respondent.
03. In Chidurala Shyamsubder v. State of
Telangana1, a learned Single Judge of the High Court,
by following the guidelines laid down by the
Honourable Supreme Court in State of Haryana v.
Bhajan Lal2, held that the Police are incompetent to
take cognizance of the offences punishable under
1 CRL.P.No.3731 of 2018 and batch dated 27.08.2018
2 1992 Supp (1) SCC 335
2
Sections 45 and 59(1) of the Food Safety and
Standards (FSS) Act, 2006, investigating into the
offences along with other offences under the
provisions of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and filing
charge sheet is grave illegality, as the Food Officer
alone is competent to investigate and to file charge
sheet following the Rules laid down under Sections
41 and 42 of FSS Act, whereas, in the present case,
the Police have registered the crime for the offences
under Sections 270 and 273 of IPC. Therefore, the
said proceedings in C.C.No.275 of 2023 filed against
the petitioner are contrary to the principle held by the
learned Single Judge of the High Court in Chidurala
Shyamsubder (supra) and, accordingly, the same are
liable to be quashed.
04. In view of the above submission, the
present Criminal Petition is allowed in terms of
Chidurala Shyamsubder (supra), and the
proceedings in C.C.No.275 of 2023 on the file of
learned Judicial First Class Magistrate, Adilabad
3
District, are hereby quashed. The petitioner/accused is at
liberty to file appropriate application before the learned
Court below for return of seized property. On such
application being filed, the learned Court below is directed
to release the seized property to the petitioner on proper
acknowledgment.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications,
if any, shall stand closed.
______________________
JUVVADI SRIDEVI, J
Date:10.01.2025
KRL
[ad_1]
Source link