Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur
Shanti Lal vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:27601) on 20 June, 2025
Author: Farjand Ali
Bench: Farjand Ali
[2025:RJ-JD:27601]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3181/2025
Shanti Lal S/o Late Shri Laxman, Aged About 28 Years, R/o
Sibiya Manas, Ps - Bagahpura, Dist. Udaipur, Rajasthan. (Lodged
In Central Jail, Udaipur)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Saurabh Soni
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Deepak Choudhary, AAG
Mr. Kuldeep Singh
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order
20/06/2025
1. The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked by way of
filing an application under Section 439 Cr.P.C./483 BNSS at
the instance of accused-petitioner. The requisite details of the
matter are tabulated herein below:
S.No. Particulars of the Case 1. FIR Number 15/2024 2. Concerned Police Station Baghpura 3. District Udaipur 4. Offences alleged in the FIR Under Sections 147, 452, 341, 323, 342 & 149 of IPC 5. Offences added, if any Under Sections 148, 458, 325, 326, 307 of IPC
6. Date of passing of impugned 06.02.2025
order
2. It is contended on behalf of the accused-petitioner that no
case for the alleged offences is made out against him and his
incarceration is not warranted. There are no factors at play in
the case at hand that may work against grant of bail to the
(Downloaded on 24/06/2025 at 09:22:43 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:27601] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3181/2025]
accused-petitioner and he has been made an accused based
on conjectures and surmises.
3. Contrary to the submissions of learned counsel for the
petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail
application and submits that the present case is not fit for
enlargement of accused on bail.
4. I have considered the submissions made by both the parties
and have perused the material available on record. The
substance of case do not bring the matter within the ambit of
Section 307 of IPC and so also considered that irked by the
infidelity of his wife, the petitioner had lost his control and
under over excitement and disturbed mental equilibrium he
caused injury and there is high probability that the trial may
take long time to conclude. In light of these facts and
circumstances, it is deemed suitable to grant the benefit of
bail to the petitioner in the present matter.
5. Accordingly, the instant bail application under Section 439
Cr.P.C./483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the
accused-petitioner as named in the cause title shall be
enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the
sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to
the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance
before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and
when called upon to do so.
(FARJAND ALI),J
20-chhavi/-
(Downloaded on 24/06/2025 at 09:22:43 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)