Shareefa And Anr vs Union Territory Through Police Station … on 18 December, 2024

0
24

Jammu & Kashmir High Court – Srinagar Bench

Shareefa And Anr vs Union Territory Through Police Station … on 18 December, 2024

Author: Sanjay Dhar

Bench: Sanjay Dhar

                                                                     Serial No. 33
                                                                     Regular Cause List.


      HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
                     AT SRINAGAR
                        CRM(M) 382/2022 CrlM(1090/2022).


       SHAREEFA AND ANR.
                                                                  ...Petitioner (s)
             Through:     None.

                                        VERSUS
       UNION TERRITORY THROUGH POLICE STATION MAGAM AND ANR.

             Through:     Mr. Mubashir Majid Malik, Dy. AG.
                                                                 ...Respondent(s)

CORAM:
             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE.
                                   ORDER

18-12-2024

01. On the last date of hearing, none had appeared on behalf of the

petitioners. Today, when the case was called out for hearing, no one has appeared

on their behalf.

02. As per the Status Report filed by the respondents, investigation in the

impugned FIR has been completed and the involvement of Mst. Aisha Begum,

Mst. Shabnam and Mst. Shaheena in the commission of alleged crime has not

been established. However, the offences under Sections 147, 148, 336, 323, 427,

354, 452 and 447 IPC have been found established against petitioner No.2 as also

against the Muzamil Ahmad Teli and Adil Teli and the challan has been laid

before the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class at Magam on 26.05.2022.

03. In view of the fact that the allegations made in the impugned FIR to

the extent of petitioner No.2 have been established after the investigation of the

case, as such, it would not be open to this Court to exercise its powers under
Section 482 CrPC to quash the proceedings as against the petitioner No.2. Once

the cognizable offences have been established against the accused, the criminal

proceedings against the accused have to proceed ahead.

04. In view of the above, the petition lacks merits and is dismissed

accordingly.

(Sanjay Dhar)
Judge

SRINAGAR
18-12-2024
Showkat Khan



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here