[ad_1]
1. Affidavit of service filed today be kept on record.
2. The delay in filing the affidavit-in-reply is
condoned and the same is also taken on record.
3. Several arguments are made by the appellants.
It is contended that all the legal heirs of the deceased
defendant were not substituted/impleaded and as
such, the impugned decree could not be passed.
Furthermore, it is contended that a money receipt,
which was treated to be an agreement for sale to
grant the impugned decree of specific performance,
was a rent receipt and could not be termed as an
agreement.
[ad_2]
Source link