–
. Heard Mr. Balbhim R. Kedar, learned counsel for the
appellants in appeal from order and revision petitioners in civil
revision application and Mr. Chaityanya Dharurkar, learned
counsel for the respondent No. 1 in both matters, who is the
5 ao 40.24 with cra
contesting party. None appears for other respondents.
2. Parties, facts and circumstances are common, hence I
propose to decide appeal from order and civil revision application
by this common judgment and order. Both the learned counsel
appearing for the contesting parties consented for the final
disposal of the matters.
3. Appellants/petitioners in both matters are original
defendant Nos. 1, 7 and 8. The respondent No. 1 in both the
matters is original plaintiff No. 1. Appellant/petitioner No. 1 is
the husband of the appellant/petitioner No. 2 and father of the
appellant/petitioner No. 3. Other respondents did not contest the
matter in the Trial Court and they have not caused appearance.
Parties are referred by their original status in Spl. C. S. No. 338
of 2024.