Patna High Court – Orders
Shreepati Mahto vs The State Of Bihar on 3 June, 2025
Author: Anshuman
Bench: Anshuman
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34371 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-75 Year-2018 Thana- BEERPUR District- Begusarai
======================================================
1. Shreepati Mahto son of Late Ishwar Mahto village- Laxmipur Ps- Beerpur,
dist- Begusarai
2. Shobha Devi Wife of Shreepati Mahto village- Laxmipur Ps- Beerpur, dist-
Begusarai
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sunil Kumar Yadav, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Gauri Shankar Gupta, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
ORAL ORDER
2 03-06-2025
Heard Learned Counsel for the petitioners and
Learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners seek regular bail in a case registered
for the offences punishable in connection with Beerpur P.S.
Case No.75 of 2018, S.T. No.177 of 2020 under Sections 341,
323, 324, 307 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the
anticipatory bail has been granted to the petitioners on
furnishing bail bond, but counsel of the petitioners has not
intimated to them that they have to appear before the court day
to day basis and only due to this reason, their bail bond have
been cancelled.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34371 of 2025(2) dt.03-06-2025
2/3
4. Counsel for the petitioners further submits that due
to non-communication of their counsel, process of sections 82
and 83 of the I.P.C. were issued, in result, petitioners were
arrested on 22.03.2025 and presently they were in judicial
custody.
5. Counsel also submits that petitioners are in custody
since 22.03.2025 having clean antecedent. He further submits
that petitioners are ready to appear before the court on day to
day basis.
6. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for
bail and anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioners with
direction to appear in person, but they have not appeared, in
result, bail bond has been cancelled. Today, the stage of this case
is that charge has not been framed till date and this case is
pending since 2018.
7. In the present facts and circumstances of this case
and the submissions made above, let the petitioners above
named, be granted bail, but only after framing of charge
imposing condition that they shall not evade their
appearance during trial, on furnishing bail bonds of
Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty thousand) each as mentioned in
Section 2(1) (d) of the BNSS, 2023 to the satisfaction of Addl.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34371 of 2025(2) dt.03-06-2025
3/3
Sessions Judge-Vth, Begusarai in connection with Beerpur P.S.
Case No.75 of 2018, S.T. No.177 of 2020 subject to the
following conditions as laid down under Section 480(3) of the
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
(Dr. Anshuman, J.)
Prakashmani/-
U T