Shubham Mishra vs St At E Of Ut T Arakhand on 23 December, 2024

0
12

Uttarakhand High Court

Shubham Mishra vs St At E Of Ut T Arakhand on 23 December, 2024

                                                     2024:UHC:9830

     I N TH E H I GH COURT OF UTTARAKH AN D
                    AT N AI N I TAL
           TH E H ON 'BLE SRI JUSTI CE ALOK KUM AR VERM A

                   2 3 r d D ECEM BER, 2 0 2 4
        FI RST BAI L APPLI CATI ON N O.2 4 7 3 of 2 0 2 4


Shubham Mishra                                    .....Applicant
                             Versus
St at e of Ut t arakhand                         .....Respondent


Counsel for t he Applicant :          Mr. Tapan Singh,
                                      Advocat e.
Counsel for t he St at e      :       Mrs. Manisha Rana
                                      Singh, Deput y Advocat e
                                      General.

H on'ble Alok Kum a r Ve rm a ,J.

The present Regular Bail Applicat ion under
Sect ion 483 of t he Bharat iya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhit a,
2023 has been filed in connect ion wit h t he Case Crim e
No.525 of 2024, regist ered at Kot wali Roorkee, Dist rict
Haridwar under Sect ions 112, 317( 2) and Sect ion 3( 5)
of t he Bharat iya Nyaya Sanhit a, 2023.

2. The applicant and a co- accused snat ched a
golden chain of t he inform ant on 08.08.2024 and ran
away. They sold t he said chain. Rs.10,000/ – ( Rupees
Ten Thousand) each were recovered from t heir
possession.

3. Heard Mr. Tapan Singh, learned counsel for
applicant and Mrs. Manisha Rana Singh, learned Deput y
Advocat e General for respondent .

4. Mr. Tapan Singh, Advocat e, has cont ended
t hat t he applicant has been falsely im plicat ed in t he

1
2024:UHC:9830
present m at t er. The co- accused of t he sim ilar role has
been released on bail by t he Magist rat e. Applicant is
not a previous convict . He is a perm anent resident of
Dist rict Saharanpur, t herefore, t here is no likelihood of
his absconding, and, he is in cust ody since 19.09.2024.

5. Mrs. Manisha Rana Singh, learned Deput y
Advocat e General has opposed t he bail applicat ion
orally.

6. Having considered t he subm issions of learned
counsel for bot h t he part ies and in t he fact s and
circum st ances of t he case, wit hout expressing any
opinion as t o t he m erit of t he case, t his Court is of t he
view t hat t he applicant deserves bail at t his st age.

7. The Bail Applicat ion is allowed.

8. Let t he applicant – Shubham Mishra be
released on bail on his execut ing a personal bond and
furnishing t wo reliable suret ies, each in t he like
am ount , t o t he sat isfact ion of t he court concerned.

___________________
ALOK KUM AR VERM A, J.

Dt : 23.12.2024
Neha

Digitally signed by NEHA BISHT
DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF

NEHA BISHT
UTTARAKHAND,
2.5.4.20=6f1c15b6305912b3f008e9a4a8038ee7326b08b2d0e018b01be75
3f014836d27, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND,
serialNumber=3D89DC33779FB9677068452F32DE6BA960BFE64D819EE4
4CA9CCE487B2FE0F92, cn=NEHA BISHT
Date: 2024.12.23 19:25:36 +05’30’

2



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here