Smt Roopa B C vs Sri Tharesh on 2 July, 2025

0
24

1. This revision petition is directed against

the judgment dated 19.12.2017 passed in Crl.A. No.

15003/2007 by V Additional District and Sessions

Judge, Devanahalli, Bengaluru Rural district

whereunder order dated 28.01.2017 passed in PCR

No. 316/2016 by Principal Civil Judge and J.M.F.C.

Devanahalli, convicting respondent – accused and

sentencing him to undergo simple imprisonment for 6

months or to pay fine of Rs.20,000/- payable to the

petitioner came to be set aside.

2. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and

learned counsel for respondent.

3. Facts in brief are that, the petitioner –

complainant filed a petition under Section 12 of the

NC: 2025:KHC:23722

HC-KAR

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act,

2005 (hereinafter referred to as the `D.V. Act’)

seeking monthly maintenance of Rs.20,000/- and

Rs.15,00,000/- towards marriage expenses, to return

the gold jewelry and other reliefs. Along with the

main petition, petitioner had also filed an application

under Section 23(2) of the D.V. Act seeking interim

maintenance of Rs.20,000/- per month for herself and

for the child. After service of notice, respondent

appeared through his counsel and sought time for

filing objections. On 22.11.2014, learned Magistrate

passed an order granting interim maintenance of

Rs.3,000/- per month from the date of petition till the

disposal of the petition. on 05.12.2014 respondent

paid a sum of Rs.8,000/- and sought time to pay

balance amount. Thereafter, the matter was referred

to conciliation, but not settled. On 20.08.2015

petitioner filed an application under Section 31 of the

D.V. Act praying to take cognizance against the

NC: 2025:KHC:23722

HC-KAR

respondent for breach of interim protection order.

Respondent filed objections to the said application.

On 15.06.2016, learned Magistrate directed the office

to register the P.C.R. and P.C.R. No. 316/2016 came

to be registered. Enquiry was conducted. Learned

Magistrate passed an order on 28.01.2017, convicting

the respondent for offence punishable under Section

31 of the D.V. Act and sentenced him to undergo

simple imprisonment for a period of 6 months or to

pay fine of Rs.20,000/-. Agreed by the said order,

respondent filed an appeal before the Sessions Court

in Crl.A. No. 15003/2017. Learned Sessions Judge,

after hearing arguments on both sides, has passed

impugned judgment, allowing the appeal and setting

aside the order dated 28.01.2017 passed in P.C.R.

No. 316/2016 by Principal Civil Judge and J.M.F.C.

Devanahalli.

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here