Sohan Lal Kanswal And Ot Hers …..Pet It … vs St At E Of Ut T Arakhand And Ot Hers on 23 December, 2024

0
19

Uttarakhand High Court

Sohan Lal Kanswal And Ot Hers …..Pet It … vs St At E Of Ut T Arakhand And Ot Hers on 23 December, 2024

                                                       2024:UHC:9832




   I N TH E H I GH COURT OF UTTARAKH AN D
                  AT N AI N I TAL
           TH E H ON 'BLE SRI JUSTI CE ALOK KUM AR VERM A

                   2 3 r d D ECEM BER, 2 0 2 4

          W RI T PETI TI ON ( M / S) N O.8 3 9 of 2 0 2 2
Sohan Lal Kanswal and Ot hers                       .....Pet it ioners
                               Versus
St at e of Ut t arakhand and Ot hers              .....Respondent s

Counsel for t he Pet it ioners :        Mr. Raj endra Dobhal,
                                        Senior Advocat e assist ed
                                        by Mr. Suryakant
                                        Mait hani, Advocat e
                                        holding brief of Mr.
                                        Shubhang Dobhal,
                                        Advocat e.

Counsel for t he                :       Mr. M.S. Bisht , Brief
Respondent s                            Holder.

H on'ble Alok Kum a r Ve rm a ,J.

The case of t he pet it ioners is t hat t he

pet it ioners are t he oust ee of Tehri Dam Proj ect and t he

resident s of different villages of Dist rict Tehri Garhwal.

On 29.06.2010, t he pet it ioner nos.1, 2 and 4 and Lat e

Mr. Sundar Lal, fat her of t he pet it ioner no.3, were

allot t ed 200 Sq m t . plot for resident ial purposes and

half acre of land for agricult ure purposes by t he

respondent no.5 in Shivalik Nagar, Haridwar, Dist rict

Haridwar. Despit e of t he said allot m ent , t he pet it ioners

were not given possession over t he land allot t ed t o

1
2024:UHC:9832
t hem for resident ial and agricult ural purposes. A Writ

Pet it ion ( No.2110 ( M/ S) of 2010) was filed. The said

Writ Pet it ion was allowed. A Cont em pt Pet it ion was

filed. The officers m ade a st at em ent in t he cont em pt

pet it ion t hat t he act ual possession of t he allot t ed plot

cannot be handed over t o t he pet it ioners due t o

pendency of civil lit igat ion bet ween B.H.E.L. and

T.H.D.C.

2. Heard Mr. Raj endra Dobhal, learned Senior

Advocat e assist ed by Mr. Suryakant Mait hani, learned

counsel holding brief of Mr. Shubhang Dobhal, learned

counsel for pet it ioners and Mr. M.S. Bisht , learned Brief

Holder for respondent nos.1 t o 5.

3. Mr. Raj endra Dobhal, learned Senior

Advocat e, has cont ended t hat t he civil lit igat ion

bet ween B.H.E.L. and T.H.D.C. has been decided vide

j udgm ent dat ed 21.11.2019. A represent at ion dat ed

03.04.2024 ( Annexure No.3 t o t he supplem ent ary

rej oinder affidavit of t he pet it ioner no.1) was m oved by

t he pet it ioner no.1, which is st ill pending before t he

respondent no.3, whereas, t he land has already been

allot t ed t o t he pet it ioner nos.2, 3 & 4. Mr. Raj endra

Dobhal, learned Senior Advocat e, has request ed t o

2
2024:UHC:9832
decide t he present Writ Pet it ion by direct ing t he

respondent no.3 t o decide t he said represent at ion of

t he pet it ioner no.1 as expedit iously as possible, but not

lat er t han one m ont h from t he dat e of product ion of t he

cert ified copy of t his order.

4. Mr. Raj endra Dobhal, learned Senior

Advocat e, has furt her request ed t o dism iss t he writ

pet it ion filed in relat ion t o t he pet it ioner nos.2, 3 and 4

as infruct uous.

5. Mr. M.S. Bisht , learned Brief Holder, has

sought six weeks’ t im e to decide t he said

represent at ion.

6. Wit h t he consent of bot h t he part ies, t he

present writ pet it ion ( M/ S No.839 of 2022) filed in

relat ion t o t he pet it ioner no.1- Sohan Lal Kanswal is

disposed of wit h a direct ion t o t he Rehabilit at ion

Direct or/ Dist rict Magist rat e, Tehri Garhwal, t he

respondent no.3, t o decide t he said represent at ion

dat ed 03.04.2024 ( Annexure No.3 to t he

supplem ent ary rej oinder affidavit ) wit hin a period of six

weeks’ from t he dat e of product ion of t he cert ified copy

of t his order.

7. I t is m ade clear t hat t his Court has not

3
2024:UHC:9832
expressed any opinion on t he m erit s of t he case.

8. The present Writ Pet it ion filed in relat ion t o

t he pet it ioner no.2- Balak Ram , pet it ioner no.3-

Sekranand and pet it ioner no.4- Sm t . Baisakhi Devi is

dism issed as infruct uous.

___________________
ALOK KUM AR VERM A, J.

Dt : 23.12.2024
Neha

Digitally signed by NEHA BISHT
DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF

NEHA BISHT
UTTARAKHAND,
2.5.4.20=6f1c15b6305912b3f008e9a4a8038ee7326b08b2d0e018b01be7
53f014836d27, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND,
serialNumber=3D89DC33779FB9677068452F32DE6BA960BFE64D819EE
44CA9CCE487B2FE0F92, cn=NEHA BISHT
Date: 2024.12.23 19:43:49 +05’30’

4



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here