Sri Chandra Shekar @ Chandu @ Chintu vs The State Of Karnataka on 7 July, 2025

0
36

Karnataka High Court

Sri Chandra Shekar @ Chandu @ Chintu vs The State Of Karnataka on 7 July, 2025

Author: S Vishwajith Shetty

Bench: S Vishwajith Shetty

                                        -1-
                                                    NC: 2025:KHC:24426
                                               CRL.P No. 13211 of 2024


             HC-KAR



                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                       DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JULY, 2025

                                     BEFORE
                  THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY
                       CRIMINAL PETITION NO.13211 OF 2024


             BETWEEN:

             1.  SRI. CHANDRA SHEKAR @ CHANDU @ CHINTU
                 S/O GOPI
                 AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS
                 R/AT NO.137, 10TH MAIN
                 'F' CROSS, SHAKTHI GARDEN
                 KALYANA NAGARA, NAGARABHAVI
                 BENGALURU-560 040.
                                                     ...PETITIONER
             (BY SRI. NARAYANASWAMY K.N., ADVOCATE)

             AND:

             1.    THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
                   KEMPAPURA AGRAHARA POLICE STATION
Digitally          REP. BY:- STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
signed by
GEETHA P G         HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
Location:          HIGH COURT BUILDINGS
HIGH COURT         BENGALURU-560 001.
OF                                                      ...RESPONDENT
KARNATAKA
             (BY SRI. RANGASWAMY R., HCGP)

                  THIS CRL.P FILED U/S.439 (FILED U/S.483 BNSS) CR.P.C
             PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON REGULAR BAIL
             UNDER SECTION 439 OF Cr.P.C. IN (CRIME NO.42/2022)
             S.C.NO.1207/2022 OF KEMPAPURA AGRAHARA POLICE
             STATION FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS
             143, 144, 147, 148, 120-B, 302, 323, 504 R/W SECTION 149
             OF IPC PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE LXIV ADDITIONAL CITY
             CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE (CCH-65) AT BENGALURU.
                                  -2-
                                               NC: 2025:KHC:24426
                                          CRL.P No. 13211 of 2024


HC-KAR



     THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:


CORAM:    HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY

                         ORAL ORDER

Accused No.1 in S.C.No.1207/2022 pending before

the Court of LXIV Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge,

Bengaluru arising out of Crime No.42/2022 registered by

Kempapura Agrahara Police Station, Bengaluru for

offences punishable under Sections 143, 144, 147, 148,

120(B), 302, 323, 504 read with 149 of IPC is before this

Court in the successive bail application filed under Section

439 of Cr.P.C.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

3. F.I.R. in Crime No.42/2022 was registered by

Kempapura Agraha Police Station, Benglauru initially for

offence punishable under Section 302 read with 34 of IPC

against one Surya and others based on the first

information dated 11.03.2022 received from Lakshmikant,
-3-
NC: 2025:KHC:24426
CRL.P No. 13211 of 2024

HC-KAR

friend of deceased Thomas. During the course of

investigation, petitioner herein is arrested on 18.03.2022

and remanded to judicial custody. After completion of the

investigation, chargesheet has been filed against eight

persons and petitioner herein is arrayed as accused No.1

in the chargesheet. His bail application filed before the

jurisdictional Sessions Court was rejected and therefore,

he approached this Court in Crl.P.No.12576/2022 which

was dismissed as withdrawn on 06.03.2023 with liberty to

the petitioner to file a fresh petition after examination of

all the eye witnesses was completed before the trial Court.

It is under these circumstances, the petitioner is before

this Court in the successive bail application.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

C.Ws.1 and 6 to 10 are the eye witnesses to the incident

in question. All the eye witnesses have been examined

before the trial Court and they have turned hostile to the

case of prosecution. Petitioner is aged about 21 years and

he has no criminal antecedents. He is in judicial custody
-4-
NC: 2025:KHC:24426
CRL.P No. 13211 of 2024

HC-KAR

for the last more than three years. Accordingly, he prays

to allow the petition.

5. Per contra, Learned High Court Government

Pleader who has opposed the petition does not dispute the

submissions made by the learned counsel for the

petitioner.

6. F.I.R. in the present case was initially registered

against two named persons and others. C.W.1-

Lakshmikant is an eye witness to the incident in question.

Petitioner’s name is not found in the F.I.R. During the

course of investigation, petitioner was arrested on

18.03.2022 and after completion of the investigation,

chargesheet has been filed against eight persons. In the

chargesheet, petitioner is arrayed as accused No.1. C.Ws.1

and 6 to 10 are the alleged eye witnesses to the incident

in question that had taken place on 11.03.2022. The

allegation against the petitioner is that he had stabbed the
-5-
NC: 2025:KHC:24426
CRL.P No. 13211 of 2024

HC-KAR

deceased Thomas with a dragger on his back and also on

his right thigh.

7. Out of the 44 chargesheet witnesses cited in

the present case, till date 09 chargesheet witnesses have

been examined by the prosecution as PWs.1 to 9. It is

brought to the notice of this Court that all the alleged eye

witnesses namely C.Ws.1 and 6 to 10 have already been

examined before the trial Court. Learned counsel for the

petitioner submits that the alleged eye witnesses including

the injured eye witness C.W.8 have turned hostile to the

case of prosecution. Be that as it may, fact remains that

all the material chargesheet witnesses including the

alleged eye witness have already been examined before

the trial Court. Therefore, there cannot be any

apprehension that the petitioner may tamper with the

material chargesheet witnesses. Petitioner is aged about

21 years having no criminal antecedents. He is in judicial

custody for last more than three years. Out of the 44

chargesheet witnesses cited in the present case, only 09
-6-
NC: 2025:KHC:24426
CRL.P No. 13211 of 2024

HC-KAR

chargesheet witnesses have been examined. Therefore,

the chances of the trial being completed and the case

being disposed of on merits in the near future is very

remote. Under the circumstances, I am of the view that

without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of

the case, prayer made by the petitioner for grant of

regular bail needs to be answered affirmatively solely

considering the period of his incarceration. Accordingly,

the following:-

ORDER

The petition is allowed. The petitioner is directed to

be enlarged on bail in Crime No.42/2022 of Kempapura

Agrahara Police Station, Bengaluru registered for the

offences punishable under Sections 143, 144, 147, 148,

120(B), 302, 323, 504 read with Section 149 of IPC,

subject to the following conditions:

a) Petitioner shall execute personal bond for
a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties for
the likesum, to the satisfaction of the
jurisdictional Court;

-7-

NC: 2025:KHC:24426
CRL.P No. 13211 of 2024

HC-KAR

b) The petitioner shall appear regularly on all
the dates of hearing before the Trial Court
unless the Trial Court exempts his appearance
for valid reasons;

c) The petitioner shall not directly or
indirectly threaten or tamper with the
prosecution witnesses;

d) The petitioner shall not involve in similar
offences in future;

e) The petitioner shall not leave the
jurisdiction of the Trial Court without
permission of the said Court until the case
registered against him is disposed off.

Sd/-

(S VISHWAJITH SHETTY)
JUDGE

PGG
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 60

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here