Sri Subal Saha & Anr vs State Of West Bengal & Ors on 10 March, 2025

0
3

Calcutta High Court

Sri Subal Saha & Anr vs State Of West Bengal & Ors on 10 March, 2025

Author: Amrita Sinha

Bench: Amrita Sinha

OD-2                        ORDER SHEET

                        WPO No.780 of 2024
                  IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
                    CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION
                            ORIGINAL SIDE


                       SRI SUBAL SAHA & ANR.
                                VS
                       STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.


BEFORE
THE HON'BLE JUSTICE AMRITA SINHA
Date: 10th March, 2025.


                                                                  Appearance:
                                                   Mr. Sukrit Mukherjee, Adv.
                                            Mr. Dipanjan Bhattacharyya,Adv.
                                                  Ms. Sananda Ganguli, Adv.
                                                          ..for the Petitioners.

                                                     Mr. Ayan Banerjee, Adv.
                                                 Ms. Oindrila Chatterjee, Adv.
                                                               ..for the State.

1.

Heard detailed submissions made on behalf of both the parties.

2. It appears that the petitioners are dissatisfied with the assessment

report made by the Collector, North 24 Parganas under Section 40

of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899.

3. From the documents annexed to the writ petition, it appears that

the learned trial Court vide order dated 16th June, 2023 passed in

Title Suit No.375 of 2012 was pleased to accept the said

assessment report.

4. A co-ordinate Bench of this Court in CO 2574 of 2023 filed by the

petitioners affirmed the order passed by the learned trial Court

vide order dated 5th October, 2023. The revisional Court clearly

held that the order impugned is justified and does not call for
2

interference. The order shall, however, not affect the rights of the

petitioners in any other proceedings.

5. Relying on the aforesaid observation of the Court, the petitioners

preferred an appeal under Section 47B of the Indian Stamp Act

which is pending consideration. The petitioners are yet to submit

the deed for execution.

6. It is held that it will be open for the petitioners to present the deed

for execution along with the stamp duty accepted by the learned

trial Court. Thereafter, if a prayer for reassessment of stamp duty

is made, the competent authority shall consider the same in

accordance with law.

7. If it is found that the original deed which was impounded by the

Court has not yet been forwarded to the registering authority, then

it will also be open for the petitioners to make a prayer before the

trial Court for transferring the original deed to the registering

authority for taking necessary consequential steps in terms of the

order passed hereinabove.

8. The writ petition stands disposed of.

9. Affidavit of service filed in Court today is taken on record.

10. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be

supplied to the parties upon compliance of all legal formalities.

(AMRITA SINHA, J.)

nm.



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here