Sripada Rao Deshpande vs Shankaarappa Angadi on 5 July, 2025

0
8

15.12.2011. He made advance payment of Rs.40,00,000/- in

the initial stage, and for the balance he issued four cheques

which were not presented to the bank by the respondent

because of a request made by the petitioner. On 20.12.2016,

the petitioner executed a memorandum of understanding

(MoU) acknowledging the past transaction of sale and

issued two cheques for the consideration he was due to

pay. The MoU dated 20.12.2016 is a new contract in

writing that came into existence according to section

25(3) of the Indian Contract Act. It was in this connection

that the cheques in question were issued and when they were

dishonoured, the respondent had to initiate action under

section 138 of N.I.Act. Therefore the cheques were issued in

connection with legally enforceable debt, and it was not a time

barred debt.

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here