State Of Gujarat vs Swami Parsottambhai Ranchhodbhai on 30 July, 2025

0
3

1. Learned advocate Mr. Sagar B. Pandya submits that learned

advocate advocate Mr. Radhesh H. Parikh has instructions to appear on

behalf of the respondent Nos. 2 to 4 and seeks permission to file his

appearance. Registry to accept the same.

2. By an order dated 09.07.2025 a notice was issued to the respondent

Nos. 1 to 4, however, the notice to respondent No. 4 returned unserved as

the respondent No. 4 had expired as per the report of the Patan City

Police City ‘A’ Division Police Station along with the letter of the

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.A/741/2011 JUDGMENT DATED: 30/07/2025

undefined

Sessions Court, Patan is taken on record. Accordingly, the appeal qua

respondent No. 4 has become infructuous.



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here