State Of Rajasthan vs Sandeep Madan Son Of Shri R.K. Madan … on 16 April, 2025

0
22

Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur

State Of Rajasthan vs Sandeep Madan Son Of Shri R.K. Madan … on 16 April, 2025

Bench: Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, Anand Sharma

[2025:RJ-JP:16196-DB]

        HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                    BENCH AT JAIPUR

                 D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 712/2024

1.       State    Of     Rajasthan,          Through          Principal   Secretary,
         Department Of Art, Literature, Culture And Archaeology,
         Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.).
2.       Jawahar Kala Kendra, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Jaipur-
         302015 Through Its Director General.
                                                                      ----Appellants
                                       Versus
1.       Sandeep Madan Son Of Shri R.k. Madan, Aged About 48
         Years, Resident Of 3-Ja-32, Jawahar Nagar, Jaipur-302004
         (Deceased)
1/1.     Babita Madan W/o Late Shri Sandeep Madan, Aged About
         49 Years, Resident Of 3-Ja-32, Jawahar Nagar, Jaipur-302
         004
1/2.     Chinmaya Madan S/o Late Shri Sandeep Madan, Aged
         About 19 Years, Resident Of 3-Ja-32, Jawahar Nagar,
         Jaipur-302 004
1/3.     Maan Madan (Minor) S/o Late Shri Sandeep Madan, Aged
         About 19 Years, Resident Of 3-Ja-32, Jawahar Nagar,
         Jaipur-302 004
                                                                    ----Respondents

For Appellant(s) : Mr. Pradeep Mathur
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prateek Jain for
Mr. Mahendra Singh

HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA

Order

16/04/2025

1. This appeal is misconceived as State and Jawahar Kala

Kendra both could not have been joined as co-appellant in one and

the same appeal. It is stated by the appellants that State has

neither appeared, nor contested the matter before the learned

(Downloaded on 17/04/2025 at 09:47:48 PM)
[2025:RJ-JP:16196-DB] (2 of 2) [SAW-712/2024]

Single Judge. It is also argued that the recommendation for

registration was made by Jawahar Kala Kendra but the State is not

accepting the same.

2. In that view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed with

liberty to file separate appeals, if so advised.

(ANAND SHARMA),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ

N.Gandhi/Neeru/49

(Downloaded on 17/04/2025 at 09:47:48 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here