State Of Up vs Tinku S/O Ravindra Kumar on 24 July, 2025

0
2

Hon’ble Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.

Re: Criminal Misc. Application (Leave to Appeal)

1. Heard Shri Ghanshyam Kumar, learned AGA appearing for the appellant-State of UP and perused the record.

2. Present government appeal has been preferred against the judgement and order dated 18.02.2021 passed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge (POCSO Act), Auraiya, in Special Sessions Trial No.15P/ 2017 (State of U.P. Versus Tinku), arising out of Case Crime No.118 of 2016, under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC and ¾ POCSO Act, Police Station Erwakatra, District Auraiya.

3. The prosecution story in brief is that the complainant has given a written report at concerned police station, Erwakatra stating therein that the daughter of the applicant/plaintiff (age about 15 years) had gone out of the village to the fields to defecate at about 6.00 P.M. in the evening as usual. Raj Kumar alias Raju son of Ramsevak, Jitendra son Lalaram, Tinku son Ravindra Kumar, Usha Devi wife of Ravindra Kumar and Ravindra Kumar son Shriram of the same village kidnapped the complainant’s daughter in a planned manner. After a lot of investigation, it was found out confidentially that now the complainant suspects that the daughter has been murdered. On the basis of above, First Information Report of the present crime was registered, investigation of the above crime was started by the investigating officer, during the investigation the investigating officer inspected the scene of incident, prepared the map, recorded statements of witnesses and on the basis of evidence collected during the investigation, when sufficient evidence was available, a charge sheet against the accused was sent to the court.



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here