Subodh Kumar vs State Of Uttarakhand on 8 January, 2025

0
54

Uttarakhand High Court

Subodh Kumar vs State Of Uttarakhand on 8 January, 2025

Author: Ravindra Maithani

Bench: Ravindra Maithani

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

     Anticipatory Bail Application No. 12 of 2025
Subodh Kumar                                ........Applicant
                          Versus
State of Uttarakhand                      ........Respondent
Present:-
      Mr. Bharat Chaudhary, Advocate for the applicant.
      Mr. Siddhartha Bisht, AGA with Mr. Himanshu Sain, Brief
      Holder for the State.
Hon'ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)

The applicant seeks anticipatory bail in

FIR/Case Crime No.520 of 2023, dated 09.11.2023,

under Sections 120-B, 395, 412, 420, 467, 468, 216-A,

471 IPC and Sections 25-3 of the Arms Act, 1959, Police

Station Kotwali, Dehradun, District Dehradun.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and

perused the record.

3. It is argued that the co-accused Rajeev Kumar

Singh alias Pullu Singh alias Sardar having similar role

has already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court.

4. Learned State counsel admits this fact.

5. Having considered, this Court is of the view

that this is a case, in which, the applicant should be

granted anticipatory bail. The instant anticipatory bail

application deserves to be allowed.
2

6. The anticipatory bail application is allowed.

7. In the eventuality of arrest, the applicant shall

be enlarged on bail on his furnishing a personal bond

with two sureties, each in the like amount, to the

satisfaction of the Arresting Officer (“the AO”) concerned.

In addition to it, the applicant shall also comply with the

following conditions:-

(i) The applicant shall not approach any witness
in any manner, whatsoever.

(ii) He shall cooperate with the investigation.

(iii) The applicant shall not leave the country
without prior permission of the concerned
court.

(iv) The applicant shall deposit his passport with
the AO. The passport may only be returned by
the order of the court concerned. If the
applicant does not have passport, he shall give
an undertaking to that effect to the AO.

(v) The applicant shall also give an undertaking on

(i), (ii) & (iii) above.

(Ravindra Maithani, J.)
08.01.2025

Sanjay

SANJAY Digitally signed by SANJAY KANOJIA
DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND,
2.5.4.20=e50e50b49596520698eff87e0a08bbd504686df4d1afc60f54a287831dec46fe,
postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND,
serialNumber=26EEB7122ED0DD23233A255DD8EC450A84B515A087CAEFD1B3179A7DEAE40

KANOJIA
699, cn=SANJAY KANOJIA
Date: 2025.01.08 18:50:51 +05’30’



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here