Sujit Das vs Unknown on 13 March, 2025

Date:

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Sujit Das vs Unknown on 13 March, 2025

13.03.2025
Item no.21.
Court No.29.
  S. De
(Allowed)
                                   CRM (DB) No. 451 of 2025

                  In Re: An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of
                  Criminal Procedure corresponding to Section 483 of the
                  Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with
                  Kotwali Police Station Case No. 462 of 2023 dated
                  14.06.2023                     under                   Sections
                  363/366A/370/370A/372/373/120B/34 of the Indian Penal
                  Code read with Sections 6/17 of the Protection of Children from
                  Sexual Offences Act (POCSO), 2012 read with Sections
                  3/4/5/6/7/9 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956.
                                      And

                  In the matter of : Sujit Das.         ......Petitioner.
                  Mr. Soumyajit Das Mahapatra,
                  Mr. Sumon Das Adhikari,
                  Mr. Madhurai Sinha,
                  Mr. Ranabeer Halder,       ......for the Petitioner.

                  Mr. Antarikhya Basu,
                  Mr. Rajashree Tah,          ......for the State

               Dictated by Arijit Banerjee, J.

1. Service report filed by the State be kept with the records. In

spite of service, nobody appears for the de facto

complaint/victim.

2. The petitioner claims parity citing an order dated January 20,

2025, passed in CRM (DB) 3814 of 2024, whereby, a co-accused

person by the name of Koushik Maity was enlarged on bail. The

petitioner says that he stands on the same footing as Koushik

Maity.

3. Learned State advocate, while opposing the prayer for bail, in

her usual fairness, does not dispute that the petitioner is

similarly circumstanced as Koushik Maity.

2

4. Hence, on the ground of parity, we allow the petitioner’s prayer

for bail.

5. Accordingly, we direct that the petitioner, namely, Sujit Das

shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/-,

with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be

local to the satisfaction of the learned Judge, Special Court

(under POCSO Act), Paschim Medinipur and on further

condition that the petitioner shall appear before the Trial Court

on each and every date of substantive hearing subject to the

provisions of Section 317 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,

1973/Section 355 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita,

2023, until further orders and shall not intimidate the witnesses

and/or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever.

6. In the event the petitioner fails to adhere to any of the conditions

stipulated above without justifiable cause, the trial court shall

be at liberty to cancel the petitioner’s bail in accordance with law

without further reference to this court.

7. The application for bail is, accordingly, allowed.

8. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order

downloaded from the official website of this Court.

(Om Narayan Rai, J.)                             (Arijit Banerjee, J.)
 



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Share post:

Subscribe

spot_imgspot_img

Popular

More like this
Related