Sumit Harsani vs Sushil Darira on 6 August, 2025

0
1

For the petitioner : Mr. Lukesh Mishra, Advocate

For respondent no.1 : Mr. Shivendu Pandya, Advocate

For the State/R-2 : Mr. Akhilesh Kumar, Govt.Advocate

(Hon’ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal)

Order on Board

06/08/2025

1. By impugned order dated 17.01.2020 passed by the JMFC, Raipur in

Criminal Case No.2295/2018, the petitioner stands convicted under

Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 and sentenced to

undergo Simple Imprisonment for 6 months and to pay the compensation of

Rs.12,05,000/- to the complainant.

2. The petitioner challenged the said order of JMFC in appeal before the

11th Additional Sessions Judge, Raipur. Along with appeal, he filed an

application under section 391 of CrPC, which has been rejected by the

appellate Court by order dated 21.09.2021 passed in Cr.A.No.53/20 (filed

on 07.10.2021). Against the said order of Appellate Court, the petitioner

filed this revision under section 397 and 401 of CrPC seeking a direction to

the appellate Court to call personnel from IT Department with relevant

record as defence witness at the stage of appeal.



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here