Sunil Kumar Kedia vs The State Of Bihar on 4 August, 2025

0
1


by one of the learned coordinate Bench of this

Court, that Complaint Case No. 1975/2022 and Cr. Revision

No. 152/2023, were both set-aside by this Court through Cr.

Misc. No. 24939 of 2025 dated 25.04.2025, for the reason

that while recording the order of dismissal, learned Magistrate

exceeded its jurisdiction and appreciated the fact instead of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31712 of 2025 dt.08-08-2025

finding a prima facie case, which may adversely affect the

right of informant/O.P. No. 2 during pending civil suit, where

the core issue to decide the genuineness of signature of father

of the informant. It is submitted that the original sale deed is

with the petitioners, and if they have clean hands, then, they

must produce the original certificate before the court for

examination of its genuineness qua signature of his father,

who said to execute the alleged sale deed in favour of the late

Manorama Devi. It is pointed out that the land in issue is

located in the prime location of the district of Bhagalpur and in

due course of time, it becomes costly, and, thereafter, the

petitioners, under conspiracy, by creating a forged signature

of the father of the informant, as he usually lived outside

Bhagalpur, firstly created a sale deed in favour of the mother

and thereafter claimed the land as her legal heirs.



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here