Surita Devi And Another vs Ut Of J&K And Others on 19 June, 2025

0
3

Jammu & Kashmir High Court

Surita Devi And Another vs Ut Of J&K And Others on 19 June, 2025

                                                                  Sr. No. 34
                                                                          2025:JKLHC-JMU:1501
     HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
                     AT JAMMU

                                                      WP (C) No. 1577/2025


Surita Devi and another                           .... Petitioner/Appellant(s)

                        Through:-    Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Advocate

                  V/s

UT of J&K and others                                       .....Respondent(s)

                        Through:-    Mr. Sumeet Bhatia, GA vice
                                     Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG
CORAM:       HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE
                           ORDER

19.06.2025

1. Notice.

2. Mr. Sumeet Bhatia, Govt. Advocate vice Ms. Monika Kohli,

learned Sr. AAG accepts notice on their behalf.

3. Considered the plea of learned counsel for the petitioners, the

petition can be disposed of at this stage without issuing notice to

the private respondent.

4. The petitioners submit in the petition that they are legally wedded

couple as they have solemnized the marriage of their own will as

per Hindu law, rites and customs at Arya Samaj, Chinnor Jammu

on 05.02.2024. The private respondent No. 4 is causing

interference in the matrimonial life of the petitioners without any

justification. The petitioners are required to be protected from the

harassment caused by the private respondent.

5. As the petitioners claim to be major and having entered into

wedlock of their own volition, they are required to be protected

against the harassment, if any caused by the private respondent.
Page 2 of 2

2025:JKLHC-JMU:1501

Learned counsel for the petitioners has referred to judgment passed

by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Writ Petition (Crl)

No.028/2004 decided on 07.07.2006 titled Lata Singh Vs. State

of U.P.

6. Accordingly, it is directed that in case the petitioners approach the

official respondents with the representation, the official

respondents shall assess the threat perception as projected by the

petitioners and accordingly proceed in the matter.

7. However, it is made clear that the court has not expressed any

opinion on the validity of the marriage between the petitioners nor

of threat or harassment allegations leveled against the private

respondent.

8. The petition is disposed of along with connected CM(s).

(Sanjay Parihar)
Judge

Jammu:

19.06.2025
Shafqat



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here