Sushant vs State Of Gujarat on 21 August, 2025

0
2

1. We have heard the learned counsel appearing

for the appellant and the respondent.

2. The appellant has been convicted for the

offences punishable under Section 20(b)(ii)(B)

and Section 22(b) of the Narcotic Drugs and

Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. He was

sentenced by the trial court to undergo a

period of 10 years for the offence under

Section 20(b)(ii)(B) and 10 years for the

offence under Section 22(b) of the Narcotic

Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

Both the sentences were ordered to run

separately. The High Court without interfering

with the conviction rendered by the Trial

Court was pleased to modify the sentences to

run concurrently. The contraband in the

instant case is of intermediate quantity.



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here