Sushil Jhajharia @ Sushil Kumar Agrawal vs Union Of India on 20 May, 2025

0
21

Chattisgarh High Court

Sushil Jhajharia @ Sushil Kumar Agrawal vs Union Of India on 20 May, 2025

                                            1/3




         Digitally
         signed by
         YOGESH
YOGESH
TIWARI
         TIWARI
         Date:
                      HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
         2025.05.20
         16:11:53
         +0530


                                  WPCR No. 287 of 2025

                      SUSHIL JHAJHARIA @ SUSHIL KUMAR AGRAWAL
                                          versus
                                     UNION OF INDIA

                                       Order Sheet


           20.05.2025           Heard Dr. Kislay Pandey, Mr. Ajay Sinha as well

                           as Mr. Sanjeev Pandey, learned counsel for the

                           petitioner. Also heard Mr. B. Gopa Kumar, learned

                           counsel appearing for the respondent.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

the petitioner has filed the instant petition under

Section 528 of Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita

(BNSS), 2023 for quashing of the FIR bearing Crime

No. RC2172025A0010 dated 25.04.2025 registered at

CBI/AC-II/NEW DELHI for the offence punishable
2/3

under Section 7/8/9/10 & 12 of the Prevention of

Corruption Act, as well as Section 61(2) of the

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 alleging that the

information has been revealed that official(s) of South

East Central Railway (SECR) are indulging in corrupt

and illegal activities in connivance with the present

petitioner. Further allegation against the present

petitioner is that on 21.04.2025, he informed his son

namely Vinap Jhajharia that he would be meeting co-

accused Sh. Vishal Anand (Chief Engineer/RSW at

SECR, Bilaspur) to ensure likely benefits for his

company in lieu of bribing accused Sh. Vishal Anand to

discuss resolution of matters and to finalize the

quantum of under advantage to be provided in this

regard.

It has been contended that the petitioner has

remained in judicial custody and the bail application

filed by the petitioner has been rejected by the trial

Court on 09.05.2025, against which, he has not filed

any bail application before this Court.
3/3

Learned counsel for the respondent prays for

and is granted three weeks’ time to file reply-affidavit

and thereafter, one week’s time is granted to the

petitioner to file rejoinder-affidavit, if any.

List the case immediately thereafter.

In view of the above, I.A. No.02, application for

urgent hearing and I.A. No.03, application for hearing

during summer vacation, stand disposed of.

                   Sd/-                                 Sd/-     -
         (Amitendra Kishore Prasad)              (Ramesh Sinha)
                 Judge                             Chief Justice
              Judge




Yogesh
 



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here