Telugu Lingamurthy vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 28 August, 2025

Andhra Pradesh High Court – Amravati

Telugu Lingamurthy vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 28 August, 2025

 APHC010444402025
                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
                                  AT AMARAVATI                           [3332]
                           (Special Original Jurisdiction)

            THURSDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF AUGUST
                  TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

                                  PRESENT

          THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

                      WRIT PETITION NO: 22773/2025

Between:

   1. TELUGU LINGAMURTHY, S/O TELUGU PEDDA VENKANNA           AGED
      ABOUT 31 YEARS,       R/O 1-151, KODUMURU VILLAGE AND MANDAL
      KURNOOL DIST.

   2. MALA SURENDRA,, S/O MALA SUNKANNA,A GED ABOUT 33 YEARS,
      R/O 8-23-B, HOSUR, PATTIKANDA, KURNOOL DIST.

                                                             ...PETITIONER(S)

                                     AND

   1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL
      SECRETARY,   SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT,
      VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

   2. THE DIRECTOR, SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, A.P.

   3. THE CONVENOR, A.P DISTRICT SELECTION COMMITTEE.

                                                           ...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be
pleased to pass an order or direction or any other proceedings one in the
nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the 2nd and 3rd
respondent in not announcing the result of the petitioners vide their hail ticket
No. MDGCOI 04945 and MDSC0017748 as illegal, arbitrary and without
jurisdiction and violation of the petitioners rights guaranteed under Art. 14, 21
of the Constitution of India and consequently to direct the respondents to
declare the results and allow the petitioner to participate in the selection
process and pass such

IA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased
may be pleased to direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents to declare the
petitioners result vide their hall ticket No. MDSC0104945 and MDSC0017748
forthwith, pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass such

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. M KARIBASAIAH

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR SERVICES II

The Court made the following order:

I.A.No.01 of 2025

1. Heard.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners in elaboration to what has been
stated in the affidavit contended that, pursuant to the notification issued by the
3rd respondent vide A.P.MEGA DSC 2025 dated 20.04.2025, the petitioners
applied for the examination which was scheduled to be held on 06.06.2025 to
06.07.2025. He further contended that, the petitioners have appeared for the
said examination on 22.06.2025 and after completion of scheduled
examinations, the 3rd respondent has declared the results of said examination
on 07.08.2025 wherein the petitioners result was not declared and displayed
error online. As such filed the present writ petition. Learned counsel for the
petitioners further submitted that the process of verifying the documents has
started today and if the petitioners results are not declared, they may lose the
opportunity of participating in the verification process which results in losing
their job apart from affecting their rights. Accordingly prayed to protect the
interest of the petitioners pending writ petition.

3. To the said submission, learned Assistant Government Pleader
submitted that as the petitioners are not eligible; their results were not
declared and however, sought time to get instructions.

4. Perused the record and considered the submissions of both the
counsel.

5. It is not in dispute that the petitioners have applied for examination
namely A.P.MEGA DSC 2025 dated 20.04.2025 and they have attended for
examination on 22.06.2025. Now the contention of the petitioners is that the
3rd respondent has announced results for the said examination on 07.08.2025
wherein petitioners result was not declared and shown error. Unless the
results were declared, the petitioners will not be knowing where they stand.

Further as the verification process has started today, if the petitioners’ results
are not declared, as rightly contended by the learned counsel for the
petitioners, it affects the rights of the petitioners. In the said circumstances,
having found that there is a prima facie point made out by the petitioners, this
Court is inclined to pass the following interim order:

“The respondent authorities concerned are hereby directed to declare
the result of the petitioners bearing hall ticket Nos. MDSC0104945 and
MDSC0017748 forthwith and if found eligible, they shall be permitted for
the process of verification of documents. However, the same shall be
subject to outcome of the writ petition and the petitioners shall not claim
any equities.”

_______________________
RAVI CHEEMALAPATI, J

WRIT PETITION NO: 22773/2025

Post on 04.09.2025 in the Motion List.

______________________
RAVI CHEEMALAPATI, J
Note:Issue C.C. by today
B/o
BRS