Chattisgarh High Court
Tijau Pandram vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 25 August, 2025
Author: Narendra Kumar Vyas
Bench: Narendra Kumar Vyas
Page 1 of 2
2025:CGHC:42950
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
MCRC No. 6687 of 2025
Tijau Pandram S/o Shri Ramcharan Pandram Aged About 56 Years R/o
Village Rali, Thana Taregaon, Jungle, District Kabeerdham C.G.
... Applicant
versus
State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station
Taregaon, Jungle, District Kabeerdham C.G.
... Respondent
For Applicant : Mr. Ashutosh Trivedi & Mr. Pritendra Chauhan,
Advocate
For State : Mr. Ajay Kumrani, Panel Lawyer
Hon’ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas
Order on Board
25/08/2025
1. This is the third bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya
Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail to the
applicant who has been arrested on 16.03.2024 in connection with
Crime No. 06/2024 registered at Police Station- Taregaon Jugle,
District- Kabirdham (C.G.), for the offence punishable under Sections
302, 201/34, 120B, 147, 148 of IPC.
2. The first bail application filed by the applicant bearing MCRC No.
5302/2024 has been dismissed by this Court on merit vide order dated
05.09.2024 and the second bail application filed by the applicant
bearing MCRC No. 9085/2024 has been dismissed as withdrawn by
this Court vide order dated 10.03.2025.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that as the applicant is
ARUN
KUMAR
DEWANGAN
Digitally signed by
ARUN KUMAR
DEWANGAN
Date: 2025.08.26
10:59:40 +0530
Page 2 of 2
in jail since 16.03.2024 and trial will likely to take some more time for
its conclusion and would pray for releasing the applicant on bail.
4. This Court has called for status report of Session Case No. 32/2024
(State Vs. Anjori Dhurve & others) for commission of offence under
Sections 148, 302/149, 120B, 201/149 of IPC. In pursuance of
direction issued by this Court, the learned Additional Sessions Judge,
Kabirdham vide letter dated 25.08.2025 has informed that only three
witnesses are to be examined by the trial Court and the matter is fixed
for tomorrow i.e. 26.08.2025
5. Since most of the witnesses have already been examined before the
trial Court and the trial is likely to reach its logical end, therefore, I am
not inclined to entertain the instant bail application at this stage, as
such, the instant bail application is liable to be disposed of.
6. Accordingly, the instant bail application is disposed of.
Sd/-
(Narendra Kumar Vyas)
Judge
Arun