Tribhuwan Choubey vs The State Of Bihar on 21 August, 2025

0
11

[ad_1]

at 08:00 p.m., when the informant along with his
Patna High Court CR. APP (DB) No.1271 of 2024 dt.21-08-2025

son was at his rice mill, then Sudama Tiwary and Uttam Tiwary

came there and started dismantling his rice mill. On protest

made by the informant, the accused persons threatened to kill

him and Sudama Tiwary fired shots, but somehow the informant

escaped and came to his house along with his son. The reason

behind the said occurrence is that six months before, both the

accused had demanded extortion money of Rs. 1 lakh from the

informant.

3. On the basis of fardbeyan of the informant,

Vishambharpur P.S. Case No. 54 of 2014 was instituted under

Sections 447, 427, 387, 385, 307 of Indian Penal Code and

Section 27 of the Arms Act of Indian Penal Code and

investigation was taken up by the police. The police after

investigation submitted charge-sheet against Respondent No. 2

and, accordingly, cognizance was taken. Thereafter the case was

committed to the Court of Sessions. Charges were framed

against the Respondent No. 2 to which he pleaded not guilty and

claimed to be tried.

[ad_2]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here