[ad_1]
. It is further noticed that in the register, the year of
birth has subsequently been cut and altered from 2003 to 2005.
However, such interpolation is not supported by any
contemporaneous record and, therefore, cannot be relied upon.
12. The father of the victim has also consistently
stated the date of birth of the victim as 31.10.2003, which
corroborates the original entry in the school register. In Rishipal
Singh Solanki vs. State of U.P. & Others reported in (2022) 8
SCC 602, the Hon’ble Supreme Court has held that in
determination of age, the first and foremost reliance should be
placed upon the matriculation or equivalent certificate, and in
absence thereof, the date of birth as recorded in the school first
attended by the child is to be given primacy. It has further been
observed that any manipulation or alteration in school records at
a subsequent stage cannot override the contemporaneous entry
Patna High Court CR. APP (DB) No.1152 of 2024 dt.19-08-2025
made at the time of first admission.
[ad_2]
Source link