[ad_1]
Andhra Pradesh High Court – Amravati
Turaka Kishore vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 7 July, 2025
_A
jlP'
/i
\ S`
[3327]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARA =i't±-i;ca;ii€j(* :.fS
MONDAY ,THE SEVENTH DAY OF JULY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
: PRESENT: '`¥+`t,+
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDO
:.'J=-g¥7S:
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5988 OF 2025
Between :
Turaka Kishore, s/o Krishna Aged about 36 years, occ:. BusI|neSS R/o
santhi Nagar,vN Devj Residency Macherla, palnadu District.
I Petitioner/Accused No.1
AND I;l=
The State ofAndhra pradesh, Rep. by its pubI[-c Prosecutor High Court
of Andhra pradesh.
Respondent/complaI-nant
petition under section 480 & 483 of BNSS I'S filed praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the criminal petition,
the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the petitioner/Accused No. 1 by
grantl.ng regular bail in crime No. 75/2025 on the f['Ie of Macherla Town Police
Station, palndu District .
The pe{l-I-ion/Appeal coming on _for hearing, upon perusing the petition
and the grounds fI-led in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of
sri RAMALAKSHMANA REDDY SANEPALLI Advocate for the petitioner,
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) for the Respondent and the court made the
following.
' `-. `i i.=\`=
a_ _*.
APHCO10292472025
lN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATl [3327]
(special original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF JULY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE, HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY
CRIMINAL PETITION NO:
Between :
1.TURAKA K[SHORE, S/O KRISHNA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,
occ. BUSINESS R/O SANTHI NAGAR,VN DEVI RESIDENCY
MACHERLA, PALNADU DISTRICT
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED
AND
1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep. by its Public
prosecutor High Court of Andhra Pradesh.
u.RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
pet'ltion under section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS
praying that 'ln the circumstances stated in the Memorandum Of Grounds
of crim|lnal petition, the High Court pleased tO enlarge the
petit-loner/Accused No. 1 by granting regular ba" in Crime No. 75/2025 on
the file of Macherla Town Police Station, Palnadu District and Pass
counsel for the petitioner/accused:
1. RAMALAKSHMANA REDDY SANEPALLI
counsel for the Respondent/COmPlainant:
-1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
The Court made the fOllOWing|.
--=i
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition, under Sections 480 and 483 of the Bharatiya
Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023j has been filed by the Petitioner/A1,
I _i
2
seeking bau in crime No.75/2025 of Macherla Town police Statl’on,
Palnadu District.
2. A case has been registered agal’nst the petI’tiOnerand others for the
offences under sections 386, 327, 307, 447, 427, 290, 109 I/w 34 IPC
and section 4 ofA.P.Land Grabbing (prohjbitjon) Act,1982.
3. case of the prosecutI®On, I’n brI®ef, js that, the complal-nant/chaIIa
sI’Va Kumar stated that he works as a lorry driver and has two married
daughters and a son, who I’S nO more. The Government allotted hj-m
Ac.0.011/2 Cents Of land in Gowda colony ,’n the year 2009 and another
Ac.0.011/2 Cents tO his daughter/NagaranI’ I’n the year 2014. His daughter,
Nagaranj bul’lt a house and compound wa” jn her plot and later, moved to
vijayawada in the year 2018. Since then, the complainant and hI’S Wife
were living in that house. As a TDP worker, his land caught the attention
of ysRCP LeaderITuraka Kishore i.e., the petitI’Oner/A1. The petitioner
and his associates threatened him to vacate and transfer the land. on
o5.6.2023 at ll.-00 p.m, they attacked the complainant wl-th weapons,
caused injury to hI’m and demolished the house. Fearl-ng for hI-S ]I’fe, he
fled to vijayawada without giving a report. The petitioner/Al l’llegally
occupied the land and built a new structure. on 12 5.2025 at 9.00 p.m,
the complainant lodged a report before Macherla urban police. BasI|ng On
the strength of report, a case was registered agal-nst the accused in
crime No.75/2025 under sections 386, 327, 307, 447, 427, 290,109 I/w
i+_ ‘T
3
34 lPC and Section 4 of A.P Land Grabbing Act, 1982. The Police
produced the petit-loner/Al in this Case On PT Warrant and he Was
remanded to judicial custody on 15.5.2025.
4. Heard learned COunSel for the Petitioner and learned Assistant
public prosecutor for the respondent-state. perused the record.
5. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor Submits that the injury
sustained by the defacto complainant is gr-]evous in nature and some
more witnesses are required to be exam’lned and therefore, prays to
dismiss the Grim-lnal Petition.
6. Learned COunSel for the Petitioner Submits that the Petitioner iS in
judic’lal custody from 15.5.2025 i.e. for more than 50 days, but POliCe did
not file charge sheet/final report by concluding the investigation. ln view
of the same] learned counsel brays to allow the criminal petit|]on.
7. A perusal Of material available On record goes tO Show that a Case
has been registered against the petitioner and others w-[th regard to
immovable property. [t is alleged that the petitioner and h’ls associates
threatened the persons effected and transferred the immovable property
in their name and dur-lng that time, there occurred an attack on the
defacto complainant and others. The pet’ltiOner Was arrested On
15.5.2025. Twice the Case has been adjourned for Want Of Wound
certificate of the defacto complainant, but it has not been placed before
the Court.
I _
4
8. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, s[-nee
major portI’On Of the investjgatl’on is completed and as the petjtjoner has
been languishing jn jaI’l for more than 50 days, this court js I-nCIjned to
grant bail to the petitioner herel’n, on the following conditions.|
(i) The petitioner/Al herein sha” be released on his executing a
personal bond for Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand only) with two
sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned
Additional Junior cI’Vil Judge, Macherla;
(ji) on release, the petitioner shall appear before the station House
officer concerned once in a week i.e. on every sunday between
10.00 a.m. and o5.00 p.m., tj” filing of charge sheet.
9. Accordingly, the criminal petition is allowed.
SD/-P.VINOD KUMAR
AS S I STAZ3E GISTRAR
//TRUE COPY// SEC"ON OFFICER
I
To,
1. The AdditI’Onal Junior civil Judge, Macherla.
2. The Superintendent, Guntur Jail, Guntur.
3. The Station House officer, Macherla Town Police Station, palndu
DistrI-Ct .
4. One CC to SRl. RAMALAKSHMANA REDDY SANEPALLI Advocate
[OPUC]
5. Two CCs to Public prosecutor (AP) Hl-gh Court ofA.P., Amaravatj
[OUT].
6. One spare copy
i\
HIGH COURT
SRK,J
DATED : 07/07/2025
BAIL ORDER
CRLP.No.5988 of 2025
ALLOWED
[ad_2]
Source link