Uday Kumar And Ors vs State Of Bihar And Anr on 17 July, 2025

0
24

[ad_1]

. It is submitted by learned Senior Counsel for

the petitioners that during the course of inquiry, altogether three

witnesses were examined by the complainant, excluding

himself, who were all yes-men of the complainant besides being

highly interested witnesses. It is further submitted that the

aforesaid witnesses have tried to support the case of the

complainant but they have given contradictory statements. The

learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners has vehemently

submitted that the present petitioners have been arrayed as
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45906 of 2016 dt.17-07-2025

accused without any specific allegation of overt act solely with

malafide intentions to purposefully harass them since at the

relevant time, they were holding different responsible posts at

the Murlipur Branch of the Punjab National Bank.

[ad_2]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here