Calcutta High Court
Upl Limited vs Astec Lifeciences Limited And Anr on 24 January, 2025
Author: Ravi Krishan Kapur
Bench: Ravi Krishan Kapur
OCD-5
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
ORIGINAL SIDE
(Intellectual Property Rights Division)
IA NO. GA-COM/1/2025
In IPDPTA/2/2024
UPL LIMITED
Versus
ASTEC LIFECIENCES LIMITED AND ANR
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR
Date : 24th January, 2025.
Appearance:
Mr. Paritosh Sinha, Adv.
Mr. K. K. Pandey, Adv.
Mr. Mitul Dasgupta, Adv.
...for the petitioner
Mr. Debnath Ghosh, Sr. Adv.
Mr. S. Ahmed, Adv.
...for the respondent no. 1
The Court: This is an application for additional evidence under Order
XXXXI Rule 27of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
It is submitted on behalf of the appellant that certain orders and
documents which were not available at the relevant point of time subsequent to
the filing of the instant appeal have come to light and the appellant intends to
rely on them.
The appellant is represented and does not object to the prayer made on
behalf of the respondent.
In view of the above, there are sufficient reasons as to why the additional
evidence sought to be relied on by the respondent are necessary for effective
adjudication of the present disputes and could not be adduced despite due
diligence.
2
Accordingly, there shall be an order in terms of prayer (a) of the
Notice of Motion.
With the above directions, IA NO.GA-COM/1/2025 stands disposed of.
The parties are directed to comply with necessary formalities.
Let this matter appear for further hearing on 19th February, 2025.
As prayed for by the parties, liberty is also granted for filing of their
respective notes of arguments.
(RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR, J.)
S.Bag
[ad_1]
Source link