Manipur High Court
Urikhinbam Kenedy Singh vs State Of Manipur & 2 Ors on 28 February, 2025
Author: A. Guneshwar Sharma
Bench: A. Guneshwar Sharma
Item Nos. 4-5
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR
AT IMPHAL
WP(C) No. 170 of 2025
Urikhinbam Kenedy Singh.
...Petitioner
- Versus -
State of Manipur & 2 Ors.
...Respondents
With
MC(WP(C)) No. 163 of 2025
B EF O R E
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. GUNESHWAR SHARMA
ORDER
28-02-2025
[1] Heard Mrs. Babita Th., learned counsel for the petitioner/applicant.
[2] Issue notice in both the main petition as well as miscellaneous
application.
[3] Mrs. L. Monomala, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice
on behalf of respondent No. 1 and Mr. Y. Nikhil, learned counsel assisting
Mr. Y. Nirmolchand, learned senior counsel, accepts notice on behalf of
respondent Nos. 2 & 3. Hence, service is complete on the respondents.
[4] Learned counsel for the respondents pray for three weeks’ time
for filing counter affidavits.
[5] Mrs. Babita Th., learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that
vide order dated 10-02-2025 issued by the Imphal Municipal Corporation,
the petitioner was granted licence for eight parking slots and by the
impugned order dated 13-02-2025, licence granted to the petitioner for eight
parking slots was cancelled with immediate effect alleging due to this court
order.
Page 1 of 2
[6] It is submitted that the impugned cancellation order dated
13-02-2025 was never furnished to the petitioner and on 25-02-2025, the
petitioner got a copy of the same from the office. It is stated that petitioner
had invested a substantial amount for management of eight parking slots
allotted to them. It is prayed that interim order staying the cancellation order
dated 13-02-2025 be granted otherwise the petitioner would suffer
irreparable loss.
[7] Mrs. L. Monomala, learned Government Advocate for the State
respondents and Mr. Y. Nirmolchand, learned senior counsel for the Imphal
Municipal Corporation, pray for some time for taking instructions.
[8] This Court has considered and perused the material on record.
The petitioner was granted licence vide order dated 10-02-2025 and the
same was cancelled by the impugned order dated 13-02-2025.
[9] Considering the fact that the petitioner was not given any
opportunity of being heard, the impugned order dated 13-02-2025 be kept
suspended till the next date.
[10] List these cases on 04-04-2025.
[11] Copy of this order be furnished to the learned counsel appearing
for the parties.
JUDGE
Victoria
NINGOM Digitally signed
by NINGOMBAM
BAM VICTORIA
Date: 2025.02.28
VICTORIA 17:22:23 +05'30'
Page 2 of 2
[ad_1]
Source link