Vemanamanda Sridevi, vs The Union Government Of India, on 5 June, 2025

0
4


Heard Sri G. Ram Gopal, learned counsel for the petitioner,

Sri O. Uday Kumar, learned Counsel Government appearing for

respondent Nos.1 & 2 and learned Assistant Government Pleader for

Home appearing for respondent No.3.

2. The Writ Petition is filed seeking to declare the action of

respondent No.3 in not renewing petitioner’s passport, pursuant to the

application vide bearing file No.25-1002499425 dated 26.02.2025

asarbitrary, illegal, etc., and for consequential direction.

3. On 29.05.2025, this Court directed the respondents to get

instructions in the matter. Thereafter, the matter stands posted today.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner while reiterating the averments

made in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, submits that the

petitioner’s son, has secured admission at State University of New York

at Buffalo commencing from 25-08-2025 to 01-06-2030, is required to

renew his passport on or before 23.06.2025. He submits that in order to

renew the passport of the petitioner’s son, the passports of the parents

must be valid. He also submits that the renewal of the petitioner’s

passport is stalled due to the pendency of FIR No.197 of 2023 of S.H.O.,

Duvvada P.S. Visakhapatnam City under Sections 415, 507, 418, 420,

120-A of I.P.C.



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here