Vijay Pal Yadav vs Mamta Singh And Ors on 26 March, 2025

0
50

The basic grievance of the petitioner in the present petition

is that he was not subjected to due treatment required under law by

the police, when they investigated a dispute he had with his

neighbour. His contention was that the law, as settled in Arnesh

Kumar Vs. State of Bihar & Another, (2014) 8 SCC 73 regarding

arrest, has been totally flouted. The further contention was that

the high-handedness of the police was such that the petitioner was

subjected to physical abuse, both at the spot as well as later in

the Police Station.

2. In support of such argument, learned counsel for the

petitioner has drawn the attention of this Court to the e-mail sent

by his brother at 11:24 AM on the same day as also to the concerned

Superintendent of Police, where it is alleged that the police had

arrested his brother. Learned counsel further reiterated that there

was physical abuse at the Police Station, only because an e-mail

was sent to the higher officials, as a knee jerk reaction, a First

Information Report was lodged against him two hours later at

01:30PM, at which time the petitioner is said to have been taken

into custody.



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here