Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur
Vijay Singh S/O Hari Singh vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jp:25690) on 11 July, 2025
Author: Sameer Jain
Bench: Sameer Jain
[2025:RJ-JP:25690]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2641/2025
1. Omprakash, S/o Birbal Singh, Aged About 50 Years, R/o
Kajra, Pilani, Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan.
2. Narendra Singh S/o Sumer Singh, Aged About 32 Years,
R/o Kajra, Pilani, Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan.
3. Dharmendra Singh S/o Ranjit Singh, Aged About 38
Years, R/o Kajra, Pilani, Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan.
4. Mukesh Singh S/o Pratap Singh, Aged About 35 Years,
R/o Kajra, Pilani, Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan.
5. Anil Sharma, S/o Mahaveer Prasad, Aged About 47 Years,
R/o Kajra, Pilani, Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan.
6. Arvind @ Goliya, S/o Sanwarmal Sharma, Aged About 36
Years, R/o Kajra, Pilani, Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan.
7. Gaurav Sharma, S/o Anil Sharma, Aged About 20 Years,
R/o Kajra, Pilani, Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan.
8. Anita Sharma W/o Anil Sharma, Aged About 45 Years, R/o
Kajra, Pilani, Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan.
----Petitioners/Accused
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.
—Respondent
2. Rekha Kanwar, W/o Dinesh Singh, Aged About 46 Years,
R/o Kajra, Pilani, Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan.
—-Respondent/Complainant
Connected With
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2591/2025
1. Vijay Singh S/o Hari Singh, Aged About 55 Years, R/o
Kajra, Pilani, Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan.
2. Dinesh Singh S/o Hari Singh, Aged About 50 Years, R/o
Kajra, Pilani, Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan.
3. Shekhar Singh S/o Vijay Singh, Aged About 25 Years, R/o
Kajra, Pilani, Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan.
—-Petitioners/Accused
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.
—Respondent
2. Anil Sharma, S/o Mahaveer Prasad Sharma, Aged About
18 Years, R/o Kajra, Pilani, Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan.
—-Respondent/Complainant
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2614/2025
1. Vijay Singh S/o Hari Singh, Aged About 55 Years, R/o
Kajra, Pilani, Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan.
2. Dinesh Singh S/o Hari Singh, Aged About 50 Years, R/o
(Downloaded on 16/07/2025 at 10:03:03 PM)
[2025:RJ-JP:25690] (2 of 4) [CRLMP-2641/2025]
Kajra, Pilani, Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan.
—-Petitioners/Accused
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.
—Respondent
2. Om Prakash S/o Shri Beerbal Ram, R/o Kajra, Pilani,
Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan.
—-Respondent/Complainant
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harish Dadhich
Mr. Abhishek B. Sharma
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, P.P. with
Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, P.P.
Mr. Anand Sharma
Mr. Harsh Dadhich
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment
11/07/2025
1. SBCRLMP No. 2641/2025 is filed under Section 528 of BNSS,
with a prayer to quash the FIR No.256/2024 registered at Police
Station Pilani, District Jhunjhunu for offences under Sections
115(2), 333, 189(2), 351(2) and 61(2)(a) of B.N.S., SBCRLMP No.
2591/2025 is filed seeking directions for quashing the FIR No.
257/2024 registered at Police Station Pilani, District Jhunjhunu for
offences under sections 115(2), 126(2), 351(2) and 352 and 3(5)
of the B.N.S. and SBCRLMP No.2614/2025 is filed seeking direc-
tions for quashing the FIR No.255/2024 registered at Police Sta-
tion Pilani, District Jhunjunu for the offences under Sections
115(2), 126(2) and 3(5) of B.N.S. and Section 3(1)(S) and 3(2)
(va) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Preven-
tions of Atrocities) Act; on the basis of compromise effectuated
between the parties herein, in respect of their inter-se dispute.
(Downloaded on 16/07/2025 at 10:03:03 PM)
[2025:RJ-JP:25690] (3 of 4) [CRLMP-2641/2025]
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that on ac-
count of certain physical altercation inter-se the neighbours, cross
FIRs were lodged. It is further submitted that due to the injuries
inflicted in the said altercations, one of the persons was also ad-
mitted in the hospital. Learned counsel for the respective parties
have placed reliance upon the judgment titled as Naushey Ali
And Ors vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors. reported in
(2025) 4 SCC 78.
3. Parties including the then injured person (present-in- Court)
have submitted that have amicably settled the dispute inter-se
them and are desirous to put quietus to the impugned FIRs and
proceedings arising therefrom. Further, members of the village
have unanimously taken a decision that compromise would result
in peace and harmony among the parties.
4. Heard and considered.
5. At the outset, this Court deems it appropriate to place reli-
ance upon the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in
Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab [(2012) 10 SCC 303], as
Naushey Ali And Ors vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors. re-
ported in (2025) 4 SCC 78 and Ramgopal Vs. The State of
Madhya Pradesh reported in [2022 (14) SCC 531], relevant
portion of which is reproduced below:
“12. The High Court, therefore, having regard to the
nature of the offence and the fact that parties have amic-
ably settled their dispute and the victim has willingly con-
sented to the nullification of criminal proceedings, can
quash such proceedings in exercise of its inherent powers
(Downloaded on 16/07/2025 at 10:03:03 PM)
[2025:RJ-JP:25690] (4 of 4) [CRLMP-2641/2025]under Section 482 Cr.P.C., even if the offences are non-
compoundable.”
6. In view of the position of law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex
Court in aforementioned case, considering the unique nature of
the case, taking note of the fact that parties herein are residents
of the same village and live in close vicinity; that parties have
settled the dispute amicably inter-se them; that quashing of FIRs
and consequential proceedings will advance peace, fellowship and
harmony among the parties, this Court deems it just and proper
to allow the present misc. petitions. Compromise is taken on re-
cord.
7. Considering the aforementioned, the present criminal miscel-
laneous petitions are allowed and the FIR No.256/2024 registered
at Police Station Pilani, District Jhunjhunu, FIR No. 257/2024 re-
gistered at Police Station Pilani, District Jhunjhunu and FIR
No.255/2024 registered at Police Station Pilani, District Jhunjunu,
with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, are hereby
quashed and set aside.
8. Accordingly, the instant petitions are allowed. Pending applic-
ation(s), if any, stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J
GAURAV/50-52
(Downloaded on 16/07/2025 at 10:03:03 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)