Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur
Vikram S/O Vinod Kumar vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jp:23275) on 16 June, 2025
[2025:RJ-JP:23275]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6185/2025
Vikram S/o Vinod Kumar, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Ward No. 38,
Jhunjhunu, Police Station Kotwali Jhunjhunu, District Jhunjhunu
(Raj) (Presently Confined In District Jail Jhunjhunu).
----Accused/Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan, through Public Prosecutor
—-Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arun Singh Shekhawat with
Mr. Aditya Matolia
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajendra Singh Shekhawat,P.P.
Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, P.P.
Mr. Jai Prakash Tiwari, P.P.
Mr. Dharmendra Kumar for
Mr. Shovit Jhajhariya
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA (V. J.)
Judgment / Order
16/06/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483
of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of the
petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR
No.0109/2025 registered at Police Station Kotwali Jhunjhunu,
District Jhunjhunu for the offence punishable under Sections 115
(2), 189(2), 331(6), 324(4) & 351(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita,
2023.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner
has falsely been implicated in this case and he is in custody since
28-29.04.2025; all the main accused have been enlarged on bail
by a coordinate Bench of this Court and no recovery has been
made from the petitioner; the investigation/trial of the case will
(Downloaded on 23/06/2025 at 09:39:56 PM)
[2025:RJ-JP:23275] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6185/2025]
take considerable time, therefore, further custody of the petitioner
would not serve any fruitful purpose, so, petitioner be released on
bail.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the
respondent have opposed the submissions made by the learned
counsel for the petitioner.
4. Heard learned counsel for both the parties and perused the
material available on record.
5. Considering the material available on record and taking into
consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case
particularly that all the co-accused persons have been enlarged on
bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court, the petitioner is in
custody since 28-29.04.2025 and trial/investigation of the case
may take considerable time, thus, without commenting any
opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court deems it
just and proper to allow this bail application.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 of
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 is allowed and it is
ordered that the petitioner Vikram S/o Vinod Kumar shall be
enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum
of ₹1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) with two sureties of like
amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court for his
appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing
and as and when called upon to do so.
7. The petitioner shall not temper with any evidence, nor would
influence the witnesses in the case.
8. It is made clear that the petitioner shall not involve in any
offence of similar nature during currency of the bail and he shall
(Downloaded on 23/06/2025 at 09:39:56 PM)
[2025:RJ-JP:23275] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6185/2025]
mark his presence in first week of every two months in the
concerned police station till trial is concluded.
9. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the
notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial
Court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court.
10. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the
attendance of the petitioner. In case the petitioner fails to mark
his presence in the concerned police station, the concerned SHO is
directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court
in this regard.
(MANEESH SHARMA (V. J.)),J
Manish/121
(Downloaded on 23/06/2025 at 09:39:56 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)