Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur
Vipin Kumar Son Of Shri Mukesh Kumar vs Directorate Of Enforcement on 17 July, 2025
Author: Uma Shanker Vyas
Bench: Uma Shanker Vyas
[2025:RJ-JP:26564]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No.
8258/2025
Vipin Kumar Son Of Shri Mukesh Kumar, Resident Of
Plot No. 74, Rani Nagar, Rani Ma Ka Mandir, Paldi
Meena, Agra Road, Jaipur. (Pettioner Confined In
Central Jail Jaipur)
----Petitioner
Versus
Directorate Of Enforcement, Through Special P.p.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Neeraj Sharma, Adv.
For : Mr. Akshay Bhardwaj, Adv.
Respondent(s) With Mr. Rajat Sharma, Adv.
Mr. Ajay Singh, Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS
Judgment / Order
RESERVED ON : 15/07/2025
PRONOUNCED ON : 17/07/2025
1- izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls ;g f}rh; tekur
vkosnu /kkjk 483 ch-,u-,l-,l- ds rgr izorZu funs’kky;
}kjk lafLFkr bZlhvkbZvkj uacj tsihtsMvks@11@2020 fnukad
17-03-20 ls lacaf/kr fopkj.k U;k;ky; esa yafcr ifjokn la[;k
03@24 vijk/k varxZr /kkjk 3@4 /ku ‘kks/ku fuokj.k
vf/kfu;e] 2002 ¼ftls vkxs ^^vf/kfu;e&2002^^ dgk tkosxk½ esa
viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq is’k fd;k x;k gS] ftl ij fo}ku
(Downloaded on 24/07/2025 at 09:57:21 PM)
[2025:RJ-JP:26564] (2 of 17) [CRLMB-8258/2025]
vf/koDrk vfHk;qDr rFkk fo}ku vf/koDrk izorZu funs’kky; dks
lquk x;k] vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;kA
2- orZeku ekeys esa ;g vkjksi gS fd eq[; vfHk;qDr egewn
[kka }kjk lg&vfHk;qDrx.k ds lkFk feydj lLrh njksa ij _.k
fnykus dh izoapuk djrs gq, fons’kh ukxfjdksa ls izkslsl
Qhl] ,Mokal Qhl] vVkWuhZ Qhl vkfn QthZ QeZ cukdj izkIr
dh rFkk dyqf”kr jkf’k dks lQsn /ku cukus ds fy, /ku’kks/ku
dk d`R; fd;kA orZeku izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ij ;g vkjksi gS fd
mlds }kjk eq[; vfHk;qDr egewn ds lkFk /ku’kks/ku ds vijk/k
esa lg;ksx fd;k rFkk mlds LokfeRo dh QeZ eSllZ fQD’ku
lksQ~V VSDuksYkkWth esa 2]60]26]753@&:i;s dh jkf’k
vuqfpr :i ls varfjr gqbZ rFkk vuqla/kku ds nkSjku
61]00]000@&:i;s mlds ?kj ls udn cjken gq,A iwoZ esa
fnukad 30-04-2024 dks vfHk;qDr dk izFke tekur vkosnu bl
vk/kkj ij [kkfjt fd;k x;k Fkk fd vijk/k xaHkhj gS rFkk
^^vf/kfu;e&2002^^ dh /kkjk&45 esa of.kZr ‘krksaZ dh ikyuk ugha
gks jgh gSA rRle; ;g Hkh vfHker izdV fd;k x;k fd tc
rd ^^vf/kfu;e&2002^^ dh /kkjk&45 esa of.kZr ‘krksZa dh ikyuk
ugha gksrh gS rc rd mPp U;k;ky; vFkok ls’ku U;k;ky;
tekur Lohd`r djus gsrq l{ke ugha gS rFkk ek= ekuuh;
loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk gh Hkkjrh; lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 142 ds
rgr mfpr ekeyksa esa tekur lqfo/kk nsus gsrq l{ke gSA
vfHk;qDr dk tekur vkosnu ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk
fnukad 31-10-2024 dks vLohdkj djrs gq, ;g vkns’k fn;k
x;k fd ;fn Ng ekg esa vkjksi fojfpr ugha gksrs gSa rks
(Downloaded on 24/07/2025 at 09:57:21 PM)
[2025:RJ-JP:26564] (3 of 17) [CRLMB-8258/2025]
vfHk;qDr l{ke U;k;ky; esa uohu vkosnu is’k djus gsrq Lora=
gksxkA
3- fo}ku vf/koDrk vfHk;qDr dk ;g fuosnu gS fd vfHk;qDr
funksZ”k gS] fnukad 29-06-2023 ls vfHkj{kk esa gS] izFke tekur
vkosnu [kkfjt gksus ds mijkUr ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk
;g Li”V fd;k tk pqdk gS fd ^^vf/kfu;e&2002^^ dh /kkjk&45
esa of.kZr ‘krksZa dh larqf”V ugha gksus ds ckotwn mfpr ekeyksa esa
laoS/kkfud U;k;ky; Hkkjrh; lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 32 vFkok
226 ds rgr tekur lqfo/kk nsus gsrq l{ke gSA ;g Hkh fuosnu
fd;k fd izFke tekur vkosnu [kkfjt gksus ds i’pkr vfHkj{kk
vof/k Hkh djhc ,d o”kZ c< pqdh gS] vHkh rd vkjksi Hkh
fojfpr ugha gqvk gS] fudV Hkfo”; esa fopkj.k iw.kZ gksus dh
laHkkouk ugha gS] lg&vfHk;qDr fojkt rFkk jQhd dks ekuuh;
loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk rFkk lg vfHk;qDr ‘kguokt dks bl
U;k;ky; }kjk tekur lqfo/kk nh tk pqdh gS] lg&vfHk;qDr
jQhd o ‘kguokt dk ekeyk orZeku vfHk;qDr ls fHkUu ugha
gSA vkjksfir vijk/k esa U;wure 3 o”kZ vkSj vf/kdre 7 o”kZ dh
ltk dk izko/kku gS] vfHk;qDr djhc nks o”kZ ls vf/kd le; ls
vfHkj{kk esa gS] vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa mls tekur lqfo/kk iznku
fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA vius rdksaZ ds leFkZu esa
fuEufyf[kr U;kf;d n`”VkUr izLrqr fd;s&
1. Manish Sisodia vs. Directorate of Enforcement
2024 SCC Online SC 1920
2. Padam Chand Jain vs. Enforcement Directorate
MANU/SCOR/07119/2025
3. V. Senthil Balaji vs. Dy. Director, Directorate of
Enforcement 2024 SCC Online SC 2626
(Downloaded on 24/07/2025 at 09:57:21 PM)
[2025:RJ-JP:26564] (4 of 17) [CRLMB-8258/2025]
4. Mahesh Mittal vs. Directorate of Enforcement
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Appl. No.13676/2024
(Raj. HC)
5. Union of India Vs. K.A. Najeeb
(2021) 3 SCC 713
6. Udhaw Singh Vs. Enforcement Directorate
2025 SCC Online SC 357.
4- blds foijhr izorZu funs’kky; dh vksj fo}ku vf/koDrk
izorZu funs’kky; us rdZ fn;k fd tc rd ^^vf/kfu;e&2002^^
dh /kkjk 45 esa of.kZr ‘krksZa dh larqf”V ugha gksrh gS rc rd ;g
U;k;ky; vfHk;qDr dks tekur lqfo/kk nsus gsrq l{ke ugha gSA
vius rdksaZ ds leFkZu esa fuEufyf[kr U;kf;d n`”VkUr is’k
fd;s&
1. Vijay Madanlal Choudhary & Ors. vs. Union of
India & Ors.(2023) 12 SCC 1
2. Directorate of Enforcement vs. Aditya Tripathi
2023 SCC Online SC 619
3. The Union of India through The Assistant
Director, Directorate of Enforcement vs.
Kanhaiya Prasad, 2025 SCC Online SC 306
4. Tarun Kumar vs. Assistant Director Directorate
of Enforcement 2023 SCC Online SC 1486
5- nksuksa i{kksa dh vksj ls izLrqr U;kf;d n`”VkUrksa dk
llEeku voyksdu fd;kA
6- vfHk;qDr dk izFke tekur vkosnu fnukad 30-04-2024
dks [kkfjt djrs gq, bl U;k;ky; dh [k.MihB }kjk Daulat
Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan 2015(2)RLW 1761 (Raj.) esa
izfrikfnr O;oLFkk ds vuqlkj ;g vfHker izdV fd;k x;k Fkk
fd ^^vf/kfu;e&2002^^ dh /kkjk 45 esa of.kZr ‘krksaZ dh larqf”V
ugha gksus ds ckotwn ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk Hkkjrh;
(Downloaded on 24/07/2025 at 09:57:21 PM)
[2025:RJ-JP:26564] (5 of 17) [CRLMB-8258/2025]
lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 142 ds rgr mfpr ekeyksa esa vfHk;qDr dks
tekur lqfo/kk nsus gsrq l{ke gS] ysfdu ,slh vlk/kkj.k
‘kfDr;ka mPp U;k;ky; vFkok ls’ku U;k;ky; dks ugha gSa vkSj
bl vk/kkj lfgr vU; vk/kkjksa ij vfHk;qDr dk fu;fer
tekur gsrq izLrqr izFke tekur vkosnu [kkfjt fd;k x;k
FkkA
7- ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk Manish Sisodia vs.
Directorate of Enforcement (Supra) ds ekeys esa
^^vf/kfu;e&2002^^ ds vkjksi esa vkjksih euh”k fllksfn;k dks
tekur lqfo/kk iznku dh x;h Fkh] ;g fu.kZ; bl U;k;ky; dh
led{k ihB ds le{k U;kf;d n`”VkUr ds :i esa ,d vU;
vfHk;qDr ^^inepan tSu^^ ds tekur vkosnu ij lquokbZ ds
le; izLrqr fd;k x;k] ijUrq led{k ihB }kjk ;g
vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k x;k fd euh”k fllksfn;k ds ekeys esa
loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk Hkkjrh; lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 142 ds
rgr tekur lqfo/kk iznku dh x;h gS vkSj varr% vU; ekeys
ds vfHk;qDr inepan tSu dk tekur vkosnu [kkfjt fd;k
x;k ftlesa vfHk;qDr inepan tSu }kjk ekuuh; loksZPp
U;k;ky; esa tekur vkosnu izzLrqr fd;kA ekuuh; loksZPp
U;k;ky; }kjk Padam Chand Jain vs. Enforcement
Directorate (Supra) esa vfHk;qDr dks tekur lqfo/kk nsrs le;
;g Li”V fd;k fd euh”k fllksfn;k dks Hkkjrh; lafo/kku ds
vuqPNsn 142 dh vlk/kkj.k ‘kfDr;ksa ds rgr tekur lqfo/kk
ugha nh tkdj Hkkjrh; lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 21 esa iznRr
ekSfyd vf/kdkjksa ds guu vkSj mudh lqj{kk ds vuqØe esa
(Downloaded on 24/07/2025 at 09:57:21 PM)
[2025:RJ-JP:26564] (6 of 17) [CRLMB-8258/2025]
tekur lqfo/kk iznku dh xbZ FkhA mijksDr fu.kZ; dk iSjk
la[;k 6 o 7 lqlaxr gS] tks fuEukuqlkj gS%&
“6. Learned Single Judge of the High Court,
while considering the law laid down by this
Court in Manish Sisodia v. Directorate of
Enforcement, 2024 SCC OnLine 1920, has
observed that this Court has granted bail in the
said matter in exercise of powers under Article
142 of the Constitution of India.
7. We may clarify that in the case of Manish
Sisodia (supra) the Court has not exercised the
powers under Article 142 of the Constitution of
India. The Court has held that the twin
conditions under Section 45 of the PMLA cannot
override the constitutional safeguards, as
provided under Article 21 of the Constitution of
India. This Court has held that a prolonged
incarceration cannot be permitted to be
converted pre-trial detention into a sentence
without trial. Like in the case of Manish Sisodia
(supra) in the present case also thousands of
documents are required to be considered at the
stage of trial, so also around 50 witnesses are
required to be examined. The main evidence in
the present case is documentary in nature,
which is already seized by the prosecution
agency. As such, there is no possibility of the
same being tampered with.”
8- Union of India Vs. K.A. Najeeb (Supra) ds ekeys esa
fof/k fo:) fØ;kdyki ¼fuokj.k½ vf/kfu;e] 1967 ds vijk/k
dk vkjksi Fkk] bl vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 43&Mh¼5½ esa fofgr dh
xbZ ‘krksZa dh larqf”V gksus ij gh tekur lqfo/kk fn;s tkus dk
izko/kku fd;k x;k Fkk ysfdu mijksDr ‘krksZa dh ikyuk ugha
gksus ds ckotwn ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; dh o`gn ihB }kjk
vfHk;qDr dks tekur lqfo/kk iznku dh xbZ] mijksDr fu.kZ; dk
iSjk la[;k 17 lqlaxr gksdj fuEukuqlkj gS%&
“17. It is thus clear to us that the
presence of statutory restrictions like Section
43-D(5) of the UAPA per se does not oust the
ability of the constitutional courts to grant
(Downloaded on 24/07/2025 at 09:57:21 PM)
[2025:RJ-JP:26564] (7 of 17) [CRLMB-8258/2025]
bail on grounds of violation of Part III of the
Constitution. Indeed, both the restrictions
under a statute as well as the powers
exercisable under constitutional jurisdiction
can be well harmonised. Whereas at
commencement of proceedings, the courts
are expected to appreciate the legislative
policy against grant of bail but the rigours of
such provisions will melt down where there is
no likelihood of trial being completed within a
reasonable time and the period of
incarceration already undergone has
exceeded a substantial part of the prescribed
sentence. Such an approach would safeguard
against the possibility of provisions like
Section 43-D(5) of the UAPA being used as
the sole metric for denial of bail or for
wholesale breach of constitutional right to
speedy trial.”
9- ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk V. Senthil Balaji vs. Dy.
Director, Enforcement Directorate (Supra) esa ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr
fd;k x;k gS fd vf/kfu;e 2002 dh /kkjk 45 esa of.kZr ‘krksZa
dh ikyuk ugha gksus ds ckotwn tgka vfHk;qDr yEcs le; ls
vfHkj{kk esa gS] fopkj.k foyfEcr gks jgk gS] fudV Hkfo”; esa
fopkj.k iw.kZ gksus dh laHkkouk ugha gS rks ,slh fLFkfr esa
vf/kfu;e 2002 esa of.kZr vijk/kksa ds ekeyksa esa Hkh laoS/kkfud
U;k;ky; Hkkjrh; lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 32 vFkok 226 dh
‘kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, tekur nsus gsrq l{ke gSA
vfHk;qDr dk tekur vkosnu Lohdkj djrs gq, fu.kZ; ds iSjk
la[;k 26 ls 29 esa izdV fd;k x;k vfHker lqlaxr gS] tks
fuEukuqlkj gS%&
“26. There are a series of decisions of this
Court starting from the decision in the case
of K.A. Najeeb, which hold that such
stringent provisions for the grant of bail do
not take away the power of Constitutional
Courts to grant bail on the grounds of
violation of Part III of the Constitution of
(Downloaded on 24/07/2025 at 09:57:21 PM)
[2025:RJ-JP:26564] (8 of 17) [CRLMB-8258/2025]
India. We have already referred to paragraph
17 of the said decision, which lays down that
the rigours of such provisions will melt down
where there is no likelihood of trial being
completed in a reasonable time and the
period of incarceration already undergone
has exceeded a substantial part of the
prescribed sentence. One of the reasons is
that if, because of such provisions,
incarceration of an undertrial accused is
continued for an unreasonably long time, the
provisions may be exposed to the vice of
being violative of Article 21 of the
Constitution of India.
27. Under the Statutes like PMLA, the
minimum sentence is three years, and the
maximum is seven years. The minimum
sentence is higher when the scheduled
offence is under the NDPS Act. When the trial
of the complaint under PMLA is likely to
prolong beyond reasonable limits, the
Constitutional Courts will have to consider
exercising their powers to grant bail. The
reason is that Section 45(1)(ii) does not
confer power on the State to detain an
accused for an unreasonably long time,
especially when there is no possibility of trial
concluding within a reasonable time. What a
reasonable time is will depend on the
provisions under which the accused is being
tried and other factors. One of the most
relevant factor is the duration of the
minimum and maximum sentence for the
offence. Another important consideration is
the higher threshold or stringent conditions
which a statute provides for the grant of bail.
Even an outer limit provided by the relevant
law for the completion of the trial, if any, is
also a factor to be considered. The
extraordinary powers, as held in the case of
K.A. Najeeb, can only be exercised by the
Constitutional Courts. The Judges of the
Constitutional Courts have vast experience.
Based on the facts on record, if the Judges
conclude that there is no possibility of a trial
(Downloaded on 24/07/2025 at 09:57:21 PM)
[2025:RJ-JP:26564] (9 of 17) [CRLMB-8258/2025]
concluding in a reasonable time, the power of
granting bail can always be exercised by the
Constitutional Courts on the grounds of
violation of Part III of the Constitution of
India notwithstanding the statutory
provisions. The Constitutional Courts can
always exercise its jurisdiction under Article
32 or Article 226, as the case may be. The
Constitutional Courts have to bear in mind
while dealing with the cases under the PMLA
that, except in a few exceptional cases, the
maximum sentence can be of seven years.
The Constitutional Courts cannot allow
provisions like Section 45(1)(ii) to become
instruments in the hands of the ED to
continue incarceration for a long time when
there is no possibility of a trial of the
scheduled offence and the PMLA offence
concluding within a reasonable time. If the
Constitutional Courts do not exercise their
jurisdiction in such cases, the rights of the
undertrials under Article 21 of the
Constitution of India will be defeated. In a
given case, if an undue delay in the disposal
of the trial of scheduled offences or disposal
of trial under the PMLA can be substantially
attributed to the accused, the Constitutional
Courts can always decline to exercise
jurisdiction to issue prerogative writs. An
exception will also be in a case where,
considering the antecedents of the accused,
there is every possibility of the accused
becoming a real threat to society if enlarged
on bail. The jurisdiction to issue prerogative
writs is always discretionary.
28. Some day, the courts, especially the
Constitutional Courts, will have to take a call
on a peculiar situation that arises in our
justice delivery system. There are cases
where clean acquittal is granted by the
criminal courts to the accused after very long
incarceration as an undertrial. When we say
clean acquittal, we are excluding the cases
where the witnesses have turned hostile or
there is a bona fide defective investigation.
(Downloaded on 24/07/2025 at 09:57:21 PM)
[2025:RJ-JP:26564] (10 of 17) [CRLMB-8258/2025]
In such cases of clean acquittal, crucial years
in the life of the accused are lost. In a given
case, it may amount to violation of rights of
the accused under Article 21 of the
Constitution which may give rise to a claim
for compensation.
29. As stated earlier, the appellant has
been incarcerated for 15 months or more for
the offence punishable under the PMLA. In
the facts of the case, the trial of the
scheduled offences and, consequently, the
PMLA offence is not likely to be completed in
three to four years or even more. If the
appellant’s detention is continued, it will
amount to an infringement of his
fundamental right under Article 21 of the
Constitution of India of speedy trial.”
10- bl U;k;ky; dh led{k ihB }kjk iwoksZDr fu.kZ;
Padam Chand Jain (Supra), Union of India Vs. K.A. Najeeb
(Supra), Manish Sisodia (Supra) vkfn ij fopkj djus ds
mijkUr ^^vf/kfu;e&2002^^ dh /kkjk 45 esa of.kZr ‘krksZa dh
ikyuk ugha gksus ds ckotwn ,dyihB nkf.Md fofo/k tekur
vkosnu la[;k&13676@2024 egs’k feRry cuke izorZu
funs’kky; esa vfHk;qDr egs’k dks yEch vfHkj{kk vof/k] fudV
Hkfo”; esa fopkj.k iw.kZ ugha gksus vkfn laHkkoukvksa dks ns[krs gq,
Hkkjrh; lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 21 ds rgr ekSfyd vf/kdkjksa ds
laj{k.k ds vuqØe esa vuqPNsn 226 ds rgr iznRr ‘kfDr;ksa dk
iz;ksx djrs gq, tekur lqfo/kk iznku dh xbZ FkhA
11- fo}ku vf/koDrk izorZu funs’kky; dh vksj ls izLrqr
U;kf;d n`”Vkar Vijay Madanlal Choudhary vs. Union of India,
Directorate of Enforcement vs. Aditya Tripathi, The Union of
India through The Assistant Director, Directorate of
(Downloaded on 24/07/2025 at 09:57:21 PM)
[2025:RJ-JP:26564] (11 of 17) [CRLMB-8258/2025]
Enforcement vs. Kanhaiya Prasad rFkk Tarun Kumar vs.
Assistant Director Directorate of Enforcement (Supra) ds
ekeyksa esa ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k x;k gS fd ^^vf/kfu;e&2002**
dh /kkjk 45 esa of.kZr ‘kfDr;ksa dh ikyuk ugha gksus ij tekur
lqfo/kk fn;k tkuk mfpr ugha gSA
12- fo}ku vf/koDrk vfHk;qDr dk fuosnu gS fd Vijay
Madanlal Choudhary (Supra) ds ekeys esa o`gnihB dk fu.kZ;
fnukad 27-07-2022 dk gS ijarq mlls iwoZ led{k ihB }kjk
Union of India Vs. K.A. Najeeb (Supra) ds ekeys esa fnukad
01-02-2021 dks fu.kZ; ikfjr djrs gq, ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k
x;k gS fd tgka Hkkjrh; lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 21 ds rgr
iznRr Rofjr fopkj.k ds ekSfyd vf/kdkjksa ds guu dh fLFkfr
mRiUu gks jgh gks rks izfrca/kksa ds ckotwn tekur lqfo/kk nh tk
ldrh gSA mudk ;g Hkh fuosnu gS fd Union of India Vs.
K.A. Najeeb (Supra) dk fu.kZ; iwoZorhZ gksus ls vkc)dj gS]
ftldk vuqlj.k Padam Chand Jain (Supra), V. Senthil Balaji
(Supra) & Udhaw Singh (Supra) vkfn ds ekeyksa esa ekuuh;
loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk fd;k x;k gSA
13- iwoZ esa vfHk;qDr dk izFke tekur vkosnu [kkfjt djrs
le; ,d vk/kkj ;g Hkh fy;k x;k Fkk fd tc rd
^^vf/kfu;e&2002** dh /kkjk 45 esa of.kZr ‘krksZa dh ikyuk ugha
gksrh gS] rc rd mPp U;k;ky; vFkok ls’ku U;k;ky;
vfHk;qDr dks tekur lqfo/kk nsus gsrq l{ke ugha gS vkSj ekuuh;
loksZPp U;k;ky; laiw.kZ U;k; dh n`f”V ls Hkkjrh; lafo/kku ds
vuqPNsn 142 ds rgr iznRr vlk/kkj.k vf/kdkfjrk ds rgr
(Downloaded on 24/07/2025 at 09:57:21 PM)
[2025:RJ-JP:26564] (12 of 17) [CRLMB-8258/2025]
tekur vkns’k ikfjr djus gsrq l’kDr gS] ijarq ,slh ‘kfDr;ka
mPp U;k;ky; dks ugha gSA ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; dh o`gn
ihB ds fu.kZ; Union of India Vs. K.A. Najeeb (Supra) esa
izfrikfnr O;oLFkk dk vuqlj.k djrs gq, ekuuh; loksZPp
U;k;ky; }kjk U;kf;d fu.kZ; Padam Chand Jain (Supra), V.
Senthil Balaji (Supra), Manish Sisodia (Supra) & Udhaw
Singh (Supra) esa ;g fu”d”kZ fn;k gS fd ‘kh?kz fopkj.k
vfHk;qDr dk ekSfyd laoS/kkfud vf/kdkj gS rFkk tgka bldk
guu gks jgk gks] vfHk;qDr yEcs le; vfHkj{kk esa gks] fopkj.k
foyfEcr gks jgk gks rFkk fudV Hkfo”; esa fopkj.k iw.kZ gksus dh
laHkkouk ugha gks rks] ,slh fLFkfr esa ^^vf/kfu;e&2002** esa of.kZr
vijk/kksa ds ekeyksa esa Hkh laoS/kkfud U;k;ky; Hkkjrh; lafo/kku
ds vuqPNsn 32 vFkok 226 ds rgr ‘kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs
gq, tekur lqfo/kk nsus gsrq l{ke gSA
14- fo}ku vf/koDrk izorZu funs’kky; dh vksj ls izLrqr
U;kf;d n`”Vkar The Union of India through The Assistant
Director, Directorate of Enforcement vs. Kanhaiya Prasad
(Supra) ds ekeys esa vfHk;qDr dks nh xbZ tekur lqfo/kk
ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk fujLr dh xbZ Fkh] ijarq
ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk gh i’pkr~orhZ fu.kZ; Udhaw
Singh (Supra) ds ekeys esa ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd The
Union of India through The Assistant Director, Directorate of
Enforcement vs. Kanhaiya Prasad (Supra) esa vfHk;qDr dh
vfHkj{kk vof/k lkr ekg dh Fkh] tks vR;f/kd vkSj vuqfpr ugha
Fkh vkSj laHkor% blh dkj.k ls rRle; lacaf/kr ihB ds le{k
(Downloaded on 24/07/2025 at 09:57:21 PM)
[2025:RJ-JP:26564] (13 of 17) [CRLMB-8258/2025]
The Union of India vs. K.A. Najeeb (Supra) & V. Senthil
Balaji (Supra) ds fu.kZ; ykxw ugha gksus ls izLrqr ugha fd;s
x;s vkSj blh dkj.k mu ij fopkj ugha gks ldkA Udhaw
Singh (Supra) ds ekeys esa vfHk;qDr dh vfHkj{kk vof/k 1 o”kZ
2 ekg gks pqdh Fkh] dqy 225 xokgksa esa ls ek= ,d xokg ds
c;ku gq, Fks] fudV Hkfo”; esa izdj.k ds fuLrkj.k dh laHkkouk
ugha gksus dh fLFkfr dks ns[krs gq, The Union of India through
The Assistant Director, Directorate of Enforcement vs.
Kanhaiya Prasad (Supra) ds ekeys ij fopkj djus ds ckotwn
Hkkjrh; lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 21 ds rgr iznRr vf/kdkj ds
e/;utj vfHk;qDr dks tekur lqfo/kk iznku dh xbZ FkhA
15- Padam Chand Jain (Supra), Manish Sisodia (Supra),
V. Senthil Balaji (Supra) & Udhaw Singh (Supra) ds ekeyksa
esa vfHk;qDr dh vfHkj{kk vof/k Øe’k% 17 ekg] 7 ekg] 15 ekg
rFkk 14 ekg gks pqdh Fkh rFkk vfHk;kstu }kjk izLrqr fd;s tkus
okys lk{khx.k vkSj nLrkostksa dh la[;k vR;f/kd Fkh] fudV
Hkfo”; esa fopkj.k iw.kZ gksus dh laHkkouk ugha gksus vkfn
ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks ns[krs gq, ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk ;g
vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k x;k fd pwafd vfHk;qDr yEcs le; ls
vfHkj{kk esa gS vkSj fudV Hkfo”; esa fopkj.k iw.kZ gksus dh
laHkkouk ugha gS] vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa Hkkjrh; lafo/kku ds
vuqPNsn 21 ds ekSfyd vf/kdkjksa ds laj{k.k ds vuqØe esa
tekur lqfo/kk fn;k tkuk mfpr gSA mijksDr pkjksa gh ekeyksa
esa ^^vf/kfu;e&2002** dh /kkjk 3@4 dk vijk/k FkkA ekuuh;
loksZPp U;k;ky; ds mijksDr fu.kZ;ksa esa izfrikfnr O;oLFkk ls
(Downloaded on 24/07/2025 at 09:57:21 PM)
[2025:RJ-JP:26564] (14 of 17) [CRLMB-8258/2025]
Li”V gS fd tgka vfHk;qDr yEcs le; ls vfHkj{kk esa gks] fudV
Hkfo”; esa fopkj.k iw.kZ gksus dh laHkkouk ugha gks] rks ,slh fLFkfr
esa ^^vf/kfu;e&2002** dh /kkjk 45 esa of.kZr ‘krksZa dh ikyuk
ugha gksus ds ckotwn ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; vFkok mPp
U;k;ky; Øe’k% vuqPNsn 32 rFkk 226 ds rgr iznRr ‘kfDr;ksa
dk iz;ksx djrs gq, tekur lqfo/kk nsus gsrq l{ke gSA vr% ,slh
fLFkfr esa bl fof/kd fLFkfr ds ckcr~ dksbZ lansg ‘ks”k ugha jgrk
gSA mijksDr fof/kd fLFkfr esa vfHk;qDr tekur lqfo/kk izkIr
djus dk vf/kdkjh gS vFkok ugha] bl fcanq ij vkxs fopkj
fd;k tk jgk gSA
16- fo}ku vf/koDrk izorZu funs’kky; }kjk U;kf;d n`”VkUr
Kalyan Chandra Sarkar Vs. Rajesh Ranjan & Anr. (2005) 2
S.C.C. 42 rFkk vU; U;kf;d n`”VkUr Ganesh Vs. State of
Rajasthan (2005) SCC Online Raj. 319 izLrqr djrs gq, ;g
Hkh rdZ fn;k fd izFke tekur vkosnu [kkfjt gksus ds i’pkr
ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa dksbZ lkjoku ifjorZu ugha gqvk gS] vr% ,slh
fLFkfr esa ;g tekur vkosnu Lohdkj ;ksX; ugha gSA
17- ;gka ;g mYys[kuh; gS fd izFke tekur vkosnu [kkfjt
djrs le; bl U;k;ky; }kjk ;g vfHker fn;k x;k Fkk fd
^^vf/kfu;e&2002^^ dh /kkjk 45 esa of.kZr ‘krkZsa dh larqf”V tc
rd ugha gksrh gS] rc rd mPp U;k;ky; tekur Lohdkj
djus gsrq l{ke ugha gS rFkk ek= loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk gh
Hkkjrh; lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 142 ds rgr mfpr ekeyksa esa bl
izdkj dk vuqrks”k iznRr djus gsrq l{ke gS] rRi’pkr ekuuh;
loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk ;g Li”V fd;k tk pqdk gS fd Manish
(Downloaded on 24/07/2025 at 09:57:21 PM)
[2025:RJ-JP:26564] (15 of 17) [CRLMB-8258/2025]
Sisodia (Supra) ds ekeys esa Hkkjrh; lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 142
ds rgr tekur lqfo/kk ugha nh x;h Fkh] vfirq vuqPNsn 21 ds
rgr ekSfyd vf/kdkjksa ds guu ds QyLo:i ;g tekur
lqfo/kk iznku dh x;h gS rFkk ,slh tekur lqfo/kk nsus gsrq
vuqPNsn 226 ds rgr mPp U;k;ky; Hkh l{ke gSA orZeku
ekeys esa ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk vfHk;qDr dks Ng ekg
esa vkjksi fojfpr ugha gksus ij uohu tekur vkosnu is’k djus
dh Lora=rk nh x;h gSA
18- nksuksa i{kksa dh cgl o miyC/k lkexzh ds vuqlkj orZeku
ekeys esa eq[; vkjksih egewn dks gksuk crk;k gS rFkk
vfHk;qDr@izkFkhZ fofiu o vU; vfHk;qDr jQhd] ‘kguokt o
fojkt ds fo:) eq[; vfHk;qDr dk lg;ksx fd;s tkus dk
vkjksi gSA vfHk;qDr fofiu o fojkt dk eq[; :i ls ;g cpko
jgk gS fd os egewn dh daiuh esa ys[kkdkj Fks vkSj mUgsa fdlh
Hkh vijk/k dh tkudkjh ugha Fkh vkSj uk gh dksbZ lgefr jgh
gSA vfHk;qDr jQhd dk tekur vkosnu bl U;k;ky; }kjk
fnukad 21-08-2024 dks [kkfjt fd;k x;k Fkk] ijarq dkykUrj esa
ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk fudV Hkfo”; esa fopkj.k iw.kZ
ugha gksus dh laHkkouk] vfHk;qDr dh ,d o”kZ dh vfHkj{kk vof/k
dks ns[krs gq, tekur lqfo/kk nh x;h FkhA vfHk;qDr fojkt dks
ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk igys gh tekur lqfo/kk iznku
dh tk pqdh gSA vfHk;qDr ‘kguokt dks cnyh gqbZ ifjfLFkfr;ksa
esa bl U;k;ky; }kjk tekur dh lqfo/kk iznku dh xbZ gSA
‘kguokt o jQhd ds fo:) Øe’k% 03 djksM :i;s o 3-25
djksM+ :i;s dh dyqf”kr jkf’k ds /ku ‘kks/ku dk vkjksi Fkk vkSj
(Downloaded on 24/07/2025 at 09:57:21 PM)
[2025:RJ-JP:26564] (16 of 17) [CRLMB-8258/2025]
orZeku ekeys esa vfHk;qDr@izkFkhZ ds fo:) djhc 2-60 djksM+
ds /ku ‘kks/ku o 61 yk[k :i;s udn mlds ?kj ls cjken gksus
dk vkjksi gS] vr% mijksDr vfHk;qDrx.k ls orZeku izkFkhZ dk
ekeyk fHkUu ugha gksdj lerqY; gSA vfHk;qDr nks o”kZ ls vf/kd
le; ls vfHkj{kk esa gS] vHkh rd vkjksi fojfpr ugha gq, gSa]
dqy 18 vfHk;kstu lk{khx.k dh lwph rFkk 184 nLrkost
ftuds i`”Bksa dh la[;k 6811 gS] izLrqr gqbZ gS] fopkj.k
U;k;ky; esa dk;ZHkkj dh fLFkfr dks ns[krs gq, fudV Hkfo”; esa
fopkj.k iw.kZ gksus dh laHkkouk ugha gSA
19- mijksDrkuqlkj fof/kd fLFkfr esa ifjorZu gksus] izFke
tekur vkosnu [kkfjt gksus ds i’pkr vfHkj{kk vof/k ,d o”kZ
vfHko`f)r gks tkus] leku :i ls vofLFkr lg&vfHk;qDr
jQhd dh tekur ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; ls rFkk lg
vfHk;qDr ‘kguokt dh tekur bl U;k;ky; }kjk Lohdkj gksus
rFkk vHkh rd fopkj.k izkjEHk ugha gksus dh fLFkfr vkfn dks
i’pkrorhZ cnyh gqbZ ifjfLFkfr;ka ekuh tkosxhA vfHk;qDr dk
tekur vkosnu [kkfjt djrs le; ekuuh; loksZPp
U;k;ky; }kjk N% ekg esa vkjksi fojfpr ugha gksus dh n’kk esa
vfHk;qDr dks uohu tekur vkosnu izLrqr djus dh Lora=rk
nh xbZ gS rFkk vHkh rd vkjksi fojfpr ugha gq, gSa vkSj bl
vk/kkj ij Hkh ;g tekur vkosnu is’k gqvk gSA laiw.kZ
ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa izdj.k ds xq.k&nks”kksa ij fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk
izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr
gksrk gSA
(Downloaded on 24/07/2025 at 09:57:21 PM)
[2025:RJ-JP:26564] (17 of 17) [CRLMB-8258/2025]
20- ifj.kker% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr fofiu dqekj iq= eqds’k dqekj
dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g f}rh; tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj dj
vkns’k fn;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZ bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k
U;k;ky; ds larks”kizn] muds U;k;ky; ;k varfjrh U;k;ky; esa
fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mls cqyk;k tk, ,oa fopkj.k
U;k;ky; dh iwoZ vuqefr ds fcuk vfHk;qDr Hkkjr ugha NksMsxk]
bl vaMjVsfdax ds lkFk viuh mifLFkfr gsrq 5]00]000@&
:i;s dk cU/k&i= rFkk 2]50]000&2]50]000@& :i;s dh nks
lqn`< izfrHkwfr;ka izLrqr dj izekf.kr djkos rks gLrxr izdj.k
esa mls tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk,A
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
Murari Lal Sharma /Reserve
(Downloaded on 24/07/2025 at 09:57:21 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
[ad_1]
Source link