Supreme Court – Daily Orders
Vipin Shersingh Agarwal vs State Bank Of India on 8 July, 2025
Author: Pankaj Mithal
Bench: Pankaj Mithal
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7428 OF 2025 VIPIN SHERSINGH AGARWAL APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE BANK OF INDIA & ANR. RESPONDENT(S) O R D E R
1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant.
2. The only point canvassed before us is that the
default had occurred on 31.01.2017 and, therefore, the
application filed under Section 95 of the Insolvency
and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (‘the Code’) was barred by
limitation. The National Company Law Appellate
Tribunal (‘NCLAT’) in the impugned order has clearly
stated that the application filed under Section 95 of
the Code is well within the period of limitation in
view of Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963 as it
stands extended on account of acknowledgment of the
debt. Plea of acknowledgement of the debt and the
extension of limitation in view of Section 18 of the
Signature Not VerifiedLimitation Act is well taken in the rejoinder which
Digitally signed by
KAVITA PAHUJA
Date: 2025.07.09
16:45:29 IST
Reason: fact is not denied.
1
3. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances,
we do not consider that the appeal has any merit and
is accordingly dismissed.
4. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand
disposed of.
…………………..J.
(PANKAJ MITHAL)
…………………..J.
(K. V. VISWANATHAN)
NEW DELHI
JULY 08, 2025.
2
ITEM NO.21 COURT NO.12 SECTION XVII
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Civil Appeal No(s). 7428/2025
VIPIN SHERSINGH AGARWAL APPELLANT(S)
VERSUS
STATE BANK OF INDIA & ANR. RESPONDENT(S)
FOR ADMISSION
IA No. 147061/2025 – EX-PARTE STAY
Date : 08-07-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ MITHAL
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.V. VISWANATHAN
[PARTIAL COURT WORKING DAYS BENCH]
For Appellant(s) Mr. Gagan Gupta, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Arvind Gupta, AOR
Mr. Kanav Bhardwaj, Adv.
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant.
2. The Civil Appeal is dismissed in terms of the signed order.
3. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(VARSHA MENDIRATTA) (NIDHI MATHUR)
COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)
[Signed order is placed on the file]
3