Virma Ram vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:32066) on 22 July, 2025

0
42

[ad_1]

Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur

Virma Ram vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:32066) on 22 July, 2025

[2025:RJ-JD:32066]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
    S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3360/2025

Virma Ram S/o Nawala Ram, Aged About 28 Years, R/o
Lapudada, Police Station Gida, District - Balotra, Rajasthan.
(At Present Lodged In Sub Jail, Pokaran)
                                                                   ----Petitioner
                                    Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor
                                                                 ----Respondent


For Petitioner(s)           :   Mr. Vikas Vishnoi
For Respondent(s)           :   Mr. Hanuman Prajapati, Public
                                Prosecutor
                                Mr. Arun Kumar for the complainant



          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT

Order

22/07/2025

The instant application for bail under Section 483 of BNSS

(439 Cr.P.C.) has been filed by the petitioner who has been

arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.103/2024, registered at

Police Station Falsund, District Jaisalmer, for the offences under

Sections 376, 376(2)(n), 406, 420, 354 & 509 of the IPC.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public

Prosecutor and the learned counsel for the complainant. Perused

the material available on record.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there were

consensual relations between the petitioner and the

complainant/victim and to substantiate his argument, learned

counsel for the petitioner has drawn attention of this Court

towards the messages and the bank transactions made between

(Downloaded on 24/07/2025 at 09:46:35 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:32066] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3360/2025]

the petitioner and the complainant/victim. Learned counsel for

the petitioner further submits that the date of incident as alleged

by the complainant is 02.05.2024, whereas the FIR was registered

on the complaint of the complainant/victim on 02.11.2024, which

is almost a delay of about six month.

Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the

charge-sheet has been filed and the petitioner is in judicial

custody since 25.11.2024 and the trial of the case will take

sufficiently long time, therefore, the benefit of bail may be granted

to the accused-petitioner.

Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor and the learned counsel

for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application.

It is contended by the learned counsel for the complainant

that petitioner was having some objectionable photographs of the

complainant/victim in his mobile phone, therefore, he was

continuously threatening and pressurizing the complainant to

make physical relations with him. Learned counsel for the

complainant further submits that the petitioner has taken gold

from the complainant and took gold loan from it. He, therefore,

submits that looking to the seriousness of the offence, the

petitioner may not be enlarged on bail.

In response to the argument aforesaid, learned counsel for

the petitioner contended that the at the time of taking loan, the

petitioner as well as the complainant/victim was also present in

the Bank.

Having considered the rival submissions, facts and

circumstances of the case, after perusing the record, considering

(Downloaded on 24/07/2025 at 09:46:35 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:32066] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3360/2025]

the fact that the challan has been filed and the petitioner is in

judicial custody since 25.11.2024 and the trial of the case will take

significant time, without expressing any opinion on

merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the

petitioner on bail.

Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 of BNSS

(439 Cr.P.C.) is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner

Virma Ram S/o Nawala Ram, arrested in connection with F.I.R.

No.103/2024, registered at Police Station Falsund, District

Jaisalmer, shall be released on bail, if not wanted in any other

case, provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and

two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, to the satisfaction of learned

trial court, for his appearance before that court on each & every

date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till completion

of the trial.

(MUKESH RAJPUROHIT),J
14-Ramesh/-

(Downloaded on 24/07/2025 at 09:46:35 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

[ad_2]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here