Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur
Vishnu Sharma S/O Mahesh Chand Sharma vs Rajasthan Staff Selection Board … on 3 July, 2025
Author: Sudesh Bansal
Bench: Sudesh Bansal
[2025:RJ-JP:24571]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16144/2024
1. Babita Bai Bairwa D/o Khem Chand Bairwa, Aged About
31 Years, R/o Village Jaisinghpura, Post Karanpura, Tehsil
Reni, District Alwar, Rajasthan.
2. Arun Rar S/o Mool Chand, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Vpo
Birol, Via Jhajhar, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan.
3. Surgyan D/o Panna Ram Bijarniya, Aged About 24 Years,
R/o Budsu, Makrana, District Nagaur, Rajasthan.
4. Ramkishore Jakhar S/o Arjun Ram, Aged About 31 Years,
R/o 605, Jato Ki Hathai, Bhopalgarh, District Jodhpur,
Rajasthan.
5. Vijaypal Sewda S/o Nathu Singh Sewda, Aged About 24
Years, R/o Sewda Ki Dhani, Bhilunda, District Sikar,
Rajasthan.
6. Ramnaresh Arya S/o Ramprasad Arya, Aged About 30
Years, R/o Vpo Beedsar, Tehsil Laxmangarh, District Sikar,
Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary,
Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
----Respondent
Connected With
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11752/2024
1. Manish Kumar Acharya S/o Nand Lal Acharya, Aged About
33 Years, R/o Dayal Nagar, Dudu Road, Phagi, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
2. Vivek Gurjar S/o Meetha Lal Gurjar, Aged About 24 Years,
R/o Village Jairampura, Post Hingotiya, Tehsil Lawan,
District Dausa, Rajasthan.
3. Kamlesh Kumar Yadav S/o Ramkaran Yadav, Aged About
29 Years, R/o Dhani Maidaswali, Village Udawala, Post
Ghashipura, District Jaipur, Rajasthan.
4. Vinod Verma S/o Rajesh Verma, Aged About 28 Years,
R/o Nh 52, Village Shishu, Tehsil Dantaramgarh, District
Sikar, Rajasthan.
5. Rajendra Meena S/o Prithvi Raj Meena, Aged About 24
Years, R/o Vpo Shaharakar, District Karauli, Rajasthan.
6. Urmila Kumari Jangir D/o Rajendra Prashad, Aged About
35 Years, R/o Sanwaloda Dhaylan, Sikar, Rajasthan.
7. Priyanka Chaudhary D/o Mahaveer Prasad, Aged About 31
Years, R/o Flat No. 52, Plot No. 84, Arpit Nagar, B Block,
Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
8. Manish Kumar Rachhouya S/o Prabhu Dayal, Aged About
(Downloaded on 05/07/2025 at 12:22:31 AM)
[2025:RJ-JP:24571] (2 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]
32 Years, R/o 31-B, Ambedkar Nagar, Kartarpura Phatak,
Jaipur, Rajasthan.
9. Divyank Dhumas S/o Surat Ram Dhumas, Aged About 28
Years, R/o Chhipo Ka Mohalla, Phooliya Kalan, District
Bhilwara, Rajasthan.
10. Sulochana Dhumas D/o Surat Ram Dhumas, Aged About
26 Years, R/o Chhipo Ka Mohalla, Phooliya Kalan, District
Bhilwara, Rajasthan.
11. Saral Saini D/o Jagdish Mali, Aged About 29 Years, R/o
Nainshukh Ki Baghiya, Jinshi, Ward No. 4, Tonk,
Rajasthan.
12. Arpit Singhal S/o Rameshwar Prasad Gupta, Aged About
27 Years, R/o Agrasen Colony, Gangapurcity,
Sawaimadhopur, Rajasthan.
13. Ajay Kumar S/o Kanhaiya Lal Bagdi, Aged About 35 Years,
R/o Behind Bagdi Bhawan, Nehru Nagar, Shri Nagar Road,
Ajmer, Rajasthan.
14. Anil Acharya S/o Shankar Lal Acharya, Aged About 26
Years, R/o Shiv Colony, 100 Feet Road, Raj Nagar, District
Rajsamand, Rajasthan.
15. Asish Patanwal S/o Lallu Lal Mahawar, Aged About 32
Years, R/o Opposite State Ware House, Choudhary
Colony, Agra Road, Dausa, Rajasthan.
16. Ravikant Sharma S/o Bhairu Ram Sharma, Aged About 29
Years, R/o Pataliyo Ki Dhani, Jaipur Road, Thanagazi,
Alwar, Rajasthan.
17. Saroj Kumari D/o Het Ram, Aged About 32 Years, R/o
Village Dinarpura, Post Katrathal, District Sikar,
Rajasthan.
18. Devashish Dasaya S/o Heera Lal Dasaya, Aged About 29
Years, R/o Suraj Pol Gate Ke Pass, Manohar Thana,
District Jhalawar, Rajasthan.
19. Anil Kumar Nagar S/o Janki Lal, Aged About 33 Years, R/o
Dhakad Mohalla, Sirpoi, District Jhalawar, Rajasthan.
20. Anita Dasaya D/o Ramesh Chand, Aged About 31 Years,
R/o Suraj Pol Gate, Manohar Thana, District Jhalawar,
Rajasthan.
21. Ajay Kumar Soyal S/o Shiv Ji Ram Soyal, Aged About 29
Years, R/o Vpo Rajmahal, Tehsil Deoli, District Tonk,
Rajasthan.
22. Deepak Kumar S/o Rakesh Kumar, Aged About 31 Years,
R/o Patidar Mohalla, Vpo Dhabla Khinchi, Tehsil Sunel,
District Jhalawar, Rajasthan.
23. Rakesh Kumar Rana S/o Rameshwar Prasad Rana, Aged
About 32 Years, R/o Pratappura, Post Jorpura, Tehsil
Jobner, District Jaipur, Rajasthan.
24. Bhartendu Lawaniya S/o Suresh Kumar Sharma, Aged
About 32 Years, R/o Ward House Road, Katara Goyal
(Downloaded on 05/07/2025 at 12:22:31 AM)
[2025:RJ-JP:24571] (3 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]
Computer Ke Samne, Tehsil Nadbai, District Bharatpur,
Rajasthan.
25. Mohit Didel S/o Dharm Singh Choudhary, Aged About 23
Years, R/o Didel Ki Dhani, Itawa, Phulera, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
26. Rajeev Chimpa S/o Jagdish Prasad, Aged About 33 Years,
R/o Vpo Khyaliwala, 11 Lnp, District Sriganganagar,
Rajasthan.
27. Amit Rawat S/o Anoop Kumar, Aged About 25 Years, R/o
Gali No. 10, Vishnupuri Colony, Near Hathras City, Railway
Station, District Hathras, Uttar Pradesh.
28. Shubham Chouhan S/o Ashok Chouhan, Aged About 25
Years, R/o Near National Fitness Centre, Siyaram Nagar,
Chandravardai Nagar, Ajmer, Rajasthan
29. Lokendra Singh Chauhan S/o Babu Singh Chauhan, Aged
About 32 Years, R/o Village Prempura, Post Khan
Bhankhari, Tehsil And District Dausa, Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary,
Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12099/2024
1. Sanjeev Kumar Kaparela S/o Rishi Kesh, Aged About 32
Years, R/o Near Railway Station, Krishna Colony, Bari,
Tehsil Bari, District Dholpur, Rajasthan.
2. Jeetendra Kumar Sharma S/o Santram Sharma, Aged
About 31 Years, R/o Jaganer Road, Timasiya, Tehsil
Baseri, District Dholpur, Rajasthan.
3. Yogesh Kumar Sharma S/o Jagdish Prasad Sharma, Aged
About 33 Years, R/o Near Rajmahal Marriage Home, Patel
Nagar Road, Behror, District Alwar, Rajasthan.
4. Ashok Kumar Meena S/o Radheshyam Meena, Aged About
32 Years, R/o Vpo Shreema, Tehsil Lalsot, District Dausa,
Rajasthan.
5. Nikhilesh Sharma S/o Madan Mohan Sharma, Aged About
28 Years, R/o 151, Maliyon Ki Dhani, Sumel, Keshav
Vidhya Peeth, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
6. Mohan Lal Meghwal S/o Tara Ram, Aged About 36 Years,
R/o 446, Naya Meghwal Vas, Jamotara, Post Bhutgaon,
District Sirohi, Rajasthan.
7. Priyanka Pancholi D/o Gordhan Pancholi, Aged About 33
Years, R/o H. No. 45, Gate No. 3, Rajat Grah Colony,
Bundi, Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
(Downloaded on 05/07/2025 at 12:22:31 AM)
[2025:RJ-JP:24571] (4 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]
Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary,
Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12382/2024
1. Radhy Shyam Kumawat S/o Dhana Ram Kumawat, Aged
About 32 Years, R/o 68/150 Near Radhe Bakers Sec.6
Haldi Ghati Gate Pratap Nagar Tonk Road Jaipur Raj.
2. Kirodi Lal Meena S/o Lallu Lal Meena, R/o Vill-Chandwas
Post- Hemlyawala Teh. Ram Grah Pachwara Dis. Dausa,
Raj.
3. Prashant Nawal S/o Bhagchand Nawal, R/o Vill. Bhudol
Vaya Gagwana Ajmer Raj. Dist- Ajmer Per. R/o Shri
Vinayak Pollution Checking Center Ajmer Raj.
4. Pankaj Kumar S/o Sitaram, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Vpo
Budaniya Chirawa Dis. Jhunjhunu Raj.
5. Ravi Yadav S/o Jagdish Prasad Yadav, Aged About 27
Years, Dusado Ki Dhani Kaladera Dis. Jaipur Raj.
6. Vatsal Joshi S/o Ram Prakash Joshi, Aged About 32 Years,
R/o 3806 Gokul Bhawan Deenanath Ji Ka Rasta Jaipur
Raj.
7. Somendra S/o Hawa Singh, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Vill.
Dhani Hukma Post Makro Jhunjhunu Raj.
8. Pooja Meena D/o Jaodhaj Meena, Aged About 25 Years,
R/o 31 Adarsh Nagar Krishna Colony Tonk ,raj.
9. Pushpendra Singh S/o Devi Singh, Aged About 30 Years,
R/o Vpo Newara Teh. Bhusawar Bharatpur Raj.
10. Pradeep Kumar Meena S/o Amar Singh Meena, Aged
About 30 Years, 32A Laxmi Nagar Bhiend Patasa Factory
Goner Road Jaipur Raj.
11. Sachin Yadav S/o Vikram Singh Yadav, Aged About 25
Years, R/o Vill. Kheri Charnan Sikar Raj.
12. Himmat Singh S/o Bhagwan Singh, Aged About 23 Years,
R/o A-68 Arawali Nagar Benad Road, Nangal Siras Jaipur
Raj.
13. Mohit Saini S/o Jugal Kishor Taksaliya, Aged About 30
Years, R/o Taksaliya Mohalla, Mujere Wali Gali Main
Market, Deeg Bharatpur Raj.
14. Narendra Khokhar S/o Lala Ram Khokhar, Aged About 28
Years, R/o Vill. Ganeshpura Post Kalakh Teh. Phulera
Jaipur Raj.
15. Surendra Singh S/o Kishan Singh, Aged About 23 Years,
R/o Gram Sirsya Post Lasadiya Teh. Phagi, Jaipur Raj.
16. Bhanu Sharma S/o Anil Kumar Sharma, Aged About 23
Years, R/o Infront Of Water Works Barlabas Rajgarh,
Alwar Raj.
17. Shubham Vyas S/o Ajay Vyas, Aged About 27 Years, R/o
(Downloaded on 05/07/2025 at 12:22:31 AM)
[2025:RJ-JP:24571] (5 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]
B-42 Vallabh Nagar Sophia School Road, Kota Raj.
18. Deepak Kumar Meena S/o Sanwar Mal Meena, Aged
About 31 Years, R/o Vill. Bai Ka Bas Post. Kanarpura Teh.
Chomu Dis. Jaipur Raj.
19. Hemant Kumar Sain S/o Subhash Chand Sain, Aged
About 27 Years, R/o Vill. Ratangarh Post. Pala Teh.
Malakhera Alwar Raj. 301406.
20. Mayur Gupta S/o Ashok Gupta, Aged About 27 Years, R/o
Punjabi Mevbasti Dantla Alwar Raj.
21. Himmat Singh Chouhan S/o Babu Singh Chouhan, Aged
About 36 Years, R/o Vill Catarpura Post Per. R/o
22. Deepak Kumar Sharma S/o Shyam Lal Sharma, Aged
About 28 Years, R/o Village Rajaheda Teh. Nadoti Karauli
23. Rishikesh Meena S/o Pyarelal Meena, Aged About 25
Years, R/o Vill. Post Dhanoli Sawaimadhopur Raj.
24. Shubham Verma S/o Ganesh Lal, Aged About 28 Years,
R/o Ramdevji K Mandir K Pichee, Nagar Parishad Ki Bundi
Dis. Bundi. Raj.
25. Neha Sharma D/o Shyam Sundar Sharma, Aged About 32
Years, R/o Ward No. 6 Neta Gali, Nansa Gate S.n. Mahila
College Ke Pass Dis. Jhunjhunu Raj.
26. Suman Kanwar D/o Rajendra Singh, Aged About 23 Years,
R/o Chhinchhas Teh. Laxmangarh Sikar Raj.
27. Satish Verma S/o Modu Lal Verma, Aged About 35 Years,
R/o Nagar Parishad Ki Gali Regar Mohalla Baharali Bundi
Raj.
28. Anurag Mittal S/o Om Prakash Mittal, Aged About 28
Years, R/o Mittal Bhawan Behind Of Akashwani Gottam
Colony Bazariya Sawai Madhopur Raj. 322001.
29. Bajrang Lal Meena S/o Ramrey Meena, Aged About 35
Years, R/o Vill. Lodera Post-Sunara , Teh- Newai Distrct-
Tonk State- Rajasthan .pincode.
30. Pushpendra Singh S/o Kamal Singh, Aged About 28 Years,
R/o Pushp Vatika Colony Beside Rural Power House
Bharatpur Raj.
31. Ajay Kumar Mahamana S/o Brijendra Singh Mahamana,
Aged About 36 Years, R/o Near Ranjeet Nagar A Block
Daya Nagar Colony 60 Feet Road Alwar Raj.
32. Aakanksha Vyas D/o Ajay Vyas, Aged About 31 Years, R/o
B-42 Vallabh Nagar Sophia School Road Kota Raj.
33. Harshit Sharma Sharma S/o Rajendra Prasad Sharma,
Aged About 25 Years, R/o P.n. 11 Narayan Vihar 2Nd
Behind Pinjarapole Gaushala Tonk Road Sanganer Jaipur
Raj.
34. Deepak Sharma S/o Banesh Kumar Sharma, Aged About
31 Years, R/o Vill And Post Gidania Teh. Chirawa
Jhunjhunu Raj.
(Downloaded on 05/07/2025 at 12:22:31 AM)
[2025:RJ-JP:24571] (6 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]
35. Danish Raza S/o Nisar Ahmed Ansari, Aged About 30
Years, Behind Masjid Sheopur Road Village Khatoli Dist.
Kota Raj.
36. Hemraj Gurjar S/o Dharmsingh Gurjar, Aged About 31
Years, R/o Vill Post Bawanpara Dausa Raj.
37. Harish S/o Manoj Kumar, Aged About 33 Years, R/o 174
Jaato Ka Mohalla Bharunda Khurd Jhunjhunu Raj.
38. Mohan Lal Sharma S/o Nanag Ram Sharma, Aged About
31 Years, R/o Village Chirara, Post - Khorashyamdass Teh.
Amer Voi. Jaitpura Jaipur Raj.
39. Ajay Singh Chauhan S/o Narendra Singh Chauhan, Aged
About 36 Years, R/o 1 Ga 4 Kala Kuan Housing Board
Alwar Raj.
40. Basant Kumar Sen S/o Sarwan Kumar Sen, Aged About
34 Years, R/o 31 Sunny Nagar Kumbha Marg Pratap
Nagar Sanganer Thana Jaipur.
41. Manish Gurjar S/o Jagdish Prasad Gurjar, Aged About 25
Years, R/o Bhadang Dhani Bawanpara Bawanpara Dausa
Raj. 303326.
42. Kailash Kumawat S/o Kanha Ram, Aged About 26 Years,
R/o Vill Mannapura Kheri Ram Post Akoda Teh,phulera
Jaipur Raj.
43. Rahul Saini S/o Sanwar Mal, Aged About 26 Years, R/o
Ward No. 01, Mandawa Jhunjhunu Raj.
44. Hemraj Gurjar S/o Kailash Gurjar, Aged About 25 Years,
Vill- Kanwarpura Post - Baniyana Teh- Lawan Dausa Raj.
45. Akash Agarwal S/o Sunil Kumar Gupta, Aged About 26
Years, R/o Ward No. 03, Karni Colony Amarsar Road Sikar
Raj.
46. Satpal Singh Gurjar S/o Shyoji Lal Gurjar, Aged About 29
Years, R/o Ward No. 09 Village Post Banetha Teh. Uniyara
Tonk Raj.
47. Rajesh Kumar Gurjar S/o Balram Gurjar, Aged About 32
Years, Vill Akbarpura , Post Shrimahaveerji Teh - Shree
Mahaveerji Dis. Karauli Raj.
48. Hemant Kumar Gupta S/o Brijesh Gupta, Aged About 31
Years, R/o Kalyan Colony Near Bank Of Baroda Bayana
Bharatpur Raj.
49. Sandeep Kumar S/o Bhanwar Lal Awana, Aged About 31
Years, R/o Vpo - Jakhora The- Chirawa Via- Mandrella
Jhunjhunu Raj.
50. Anita Kumari D/o Khyali Ram Gurjar, Aged About 31
Years, R/o Vpo- Jakhora Teh- Chirawa Jhunjhunu Raj.
51. Darshna Saraswat D/o Poonam Chand Saraswat, Aged
About 32 Years, R/o 17 Gayatri Nagar Ajmer Road Sodala
Jaipur Raj. 302006
52. Vipin Kumar Gurjar S/o Kanhaiya Lal Gurjar, R/o Vill.
(Downloaded on 05/07/2025 at 12:22:31 AM)
[2025:RJ-JP:24571] (7 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]
Kalighati Post- Bilonchi Via- Morija Teh -Amer Jaipur Raj.
53. Kunal Yadav S/o Suresh Kumar Yadav, Aged About 21
Years, R/o Path No.1, Krishna Vihar Colony Renwal Road ,
Near Power House Chomu Dis. Jaipur Raj.
54. Akshay Kumar Khatri S/o Hira Lal, R/o B-203 Gomti
Apartment Sec 18 Pratap Nagar, Sanganer Jaipur.
55. Himmat Kumar Meena S/o Banshi Dhar, Aged About 31
Years, R/o Village - Bhagwanpura Post- Cheeplata, Teh-
Neem Ka Thana Sikar, Raj.
56. Vaidehi Sharma D/o Shrawan Kumar Sharma, Aged About
26 Years, R/o Vimalpura, Post- Kanarpura, Via Kalader
Teh- Chomu Jaipur
57. Mahesh Kumar Sharma S/o Roodmal Sharma, Aged About
30 Years, R/o Vimalpura Post- Kanapura, Teh- Chomu
Jaipur
58. Vinod Gochar S/o Shyoji Lal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o
Vill. Anantganj Post- Dhowara Teh- Hindoli Bundi Raj
59. Suresh Kumar S/o Girdhari Lal Samota, Aged About 32
Years, R/o Viil. Derawali Dhani Post Jairampura Teh -
Srimadhopur Sikar Raj.
60. Manish Sharma S/o Banwari Lal Sharma, Aged About 30
Years, R/o Vpo - Jatwara Dhani Girdharwas Teh- Bassi
Jaipur Raj.
61. Vipin Gautam S/o Prakash Chand Goutam, Aged About 35
Years, R/o 1-G-12 Mahaveer Nagar Extension , Kota
62. Gurjar Ashok S/o Kailash Ram, Aged About 26 Years, R/o
Dhabhaiyo Ka Mohalla, Harsolao Near Co-Operative Kota,
Hrsolao, Medta City District Nagaur, Presently Residing At
23, Bajiya Pg, Gangaram Nagar, Gopal Pura By Pass
Jaipur.
63. Manmohan Singh Gurjar S/o Indraraj Gurjar, Aged About
25 Years, R/o Peepalkheda, Mahwa Dausa.
64. Rajesh Kumar Gurjar S/o Bachhu Singh Gurjar, Aged
About 26 Years, R/o Basda, Geejgarh Road, Sikandra,
District Dausa.
65. Ajay Varma S/o Lachhi Ram Verma, Aged About 29 Years,
R/o House Number 280, Ambedkar Colony, Kunhadi Police
Station , Kota.
66. Ravinder Singh S/o Ajit Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o
Vill Kherki, Behror, Post- Gunti, District Alwar.
67. Ramavtar Meena S/o Bheema Ram Meena, Aged About 28
Years, R/o Rang Lal Ka Pura Tah- Todabhim, District
Karauli.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of
Information Technologies And Communications,
(Downloaded on 05/07/2025 at 12:22:31 AM)
[2025:RJ-JP:24571] (8 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]
Secretraite, Jaipur.
2. Rajasthan Subordinate And Ministrial Services Selection
Board (Rsmssb), Through Its Secretary, State Institute Of
Agriculture Management Premises, Durgapura, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12595/2024
1. Kundan Swami S/o Sita Ram Swami, Aged About 28
Years, R/o Shiv Colony Med Viratnagar, District Jaipur.
2. Shailendra Kumar S/o Suraj Mal, Aged About 31 Years,
R/o Vill-Murraki Post Didyari Teh-Bayana, District
Bharatpur.
3. Monu Jangid D/o Sharwan Kumar Jangir, Aged About 26
Years, R/o Jyoti Nagar, Dhod Road, Sikar.
4. Pukhraj Gurjar S/o Ramji Lal Gurjar, Aged About 32
Years, R/o Vill- Soonthra Post Soonthra Teh-Uniyara,
District -Tonk
5. Balvenendra Kumar S/o Sohanlal, Aged About 30 Years,
R/o Vpo -Channa Teh-Chirawa District-Jhunjhunu.
6. Prerana Sharma D/o Ramavatar Sharma, Aged About 31
Years, R/o Vpo-Alisar Via-Kaladera The -Chomu, District-
Jaipur.
7. Yogesh Kumar Saini S/o Madan Lal Saini, Aged About 31
Years, R/o Vill-Manota Khurd, Post -Khetri Nagar, Teh-
Khetri, District Jhunjhunu.
8. Abhay Singh S/o Tej Singh, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Gali
District Bharatpur, Rajasthan -321642
9. Pankaj D/o Hetram, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Suresh
Kumar Raslana, Hanumangarh 335502, Presently
Residing At 55/47 Heera Path, Madhyam Marg,
Mansarovar, Jaipur.
10. Pankaj Kumar Bairwa S/o Babulal Bairwa, Aged About 25
Years, R/o Vill-Naryanpura Post-Peechupara Kalan, Baswa
District Dausa Rajasthan.
11. Jitendra Kumar Meena S/o Rameshwar Prasad Meena,
Aged About 29 Years, R/o Vpo Dholeta Teh- Nadoti.
District Karauli-322213
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of
Information Technologies And Communications,
Secretraite, Jaipur.
2. Rajasthan Subordinate And Ministrial Services Selection
Borad (Rsmssb), Through Its Secretary, State Institute Of
Agriculture Management Premises, Durgapura, Jaipur -
302018, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
(Downloaded on 05/07/2025 at 12:22:31 AM)
[2025:RJ-JP:24571] (9 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13055/2024
Lakshya Jaiman S/o Shri Ram Avtar Sharma, Aged About 24
Years, R/o Behind Madhuvan Hotel, Near Pradhan Paradise, Agra
Road, Dausa, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of
Information Technology And Communication, Government
Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Commissioner And Special Secretary, Department Of
Information Technology And Communication, It Building,
Yojana Bhavan Campus, Tilak Marg, C Scheme, Ashok
Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
3. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary,
Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura,
Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13246/2024
Mukesh Chandra Sharma S/o Ramchandra Sharma, R/o
Aashakali Ki Dhani, Vpo Labana, Via Achrol Teh Amer, District
Jaipur.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary,
Department Of Information Technology And
Communication, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Commissioner Cum Special Secretary, Department Of
Information Technology And Communication, Jaipur.
3. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary,
State Institute Of Agriculture Management Premises,
Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13614/2024
1. Vijay Kumar Choudhary S/o Virendra Singh Choudhary,
Aged About 28 Years, R/o Bhata Ki Dhani, Village
Sudarshanpura, Post Jalsoo, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. Dharmendra Mali S/o Shyam Lal Mali, Aged About 31
Years, R/o Maliyo Ki Chouki, Amargarh, District
Sawaimadhopur, Rajasthan.
3. Mukesh S/o Prema Ram, Aged About 32 Years, R/o
3/234, Old Housing Board, Pali, District Pali, Rajasthan.
4. Babita Varma D/o Sharawan Kumar Varma, Aged About
34 Years, R/o Ward No. 20, Chhawani Badi, Jamat, Tehsil
Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar, Rajasthan.
5. Asha Dangi D/o Nand Lal Dangi, Aged About 26 Years,
R/o Village Thoor, Tehsil Badgaon, District Udaipur,
(Downloaded on 05/07/2025 at 12:22:31 AM)
[2025:RJ-JP:24571] (10 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]
Rajasthan.
6. Jimmy Gupta S/o Lokesh Gupta, Aged About 35 Years,
R/o Near Bus Stand, Bhartari Colony, Bayana, District
Bharatpur, Rajasthan.
7. Kailash Kunwar Rathore D/o Bheru Singh Rathore, Aged
About 35 Years, R/o Village Kochala, Post Sultan Ji Ka
Kherwara, Tehsil Jhadol, District Udaipur, Rajasthan.
8. Suraj Saini S/o Rampal Saini, Aged About 30 Years, R/o
Plot No. 98, Kakuniya Ki Dhani, Boytawala, Benar Road,
Jhotwara, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
9. Hanuman Nogiya S/o Bhola Shankar Verma, Aged About
32 Years, R/o Deipol Chungi Naka, Ward No. 12, Nainwa,
Bundi, Rajasthan.
10. Abhishek Chouhan S/o Ganga Sagar Chouhan, Aged
About 26 Years, R/o Chouhan Panchayat Bhawan Ke Pass,
District Ajmer, Rajasthan.
11. Manoj Sharma S/o Mangal Chand Sharma, Aged About 22
Years, R/o Village Radhapura, Post Radhapura, Post
Radhakishanpura, Block Jalsoo, District Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary,
Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13655/2024
1. Narendra Singh Gurjar S/o Sumer Mal Gurjar, Aged About
30 Years, R/o Vpo Manaksas, Tehsil Udaipurwati, District
Neem Ka Thana, Rajasthan.
2. Lokendra Khatana S/o Omprakash Khatana, Aged About
24 Years, R/o Village Khuntala Ka Bas, Post Khuntala,
Tehsil Baswa, District Dausa, Rajasthan.
3. Himani Jain D/o Mahendra Kumar Jain, Aged About 32
Years, R/o Ward No. 7, Akshay Jain Sanghi Ji Ke Mandir
Ke Pass, Todapole, Nainwan, District Bundi, Rajasthan.
4. Nitesh Shakrawal S/o Ram Kumar Shakrawal, Aged About
33 Years, R/o 93, Shri Kalyan Nagar, Kartarpura, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
5. Arjun Singh Chouhan S/o Heem Singh, Aged About 27
Years, R/o Vpo Punawali, Tehsil Gogunda, District Udaipur,
Rajasthan.
6. Saurabh Joshi S/o Om Prakash Joshi, Aged About 33
Years, R/o Brhampuri, Vpo Kurabad, District Udaipur,
Rajasthan.
7. Arpit Vaishnav S/o Girdhari Vaishnav, Aged About 30
Years, R/o 161, Abadi Khas, Bemla, Tehsil Girwa, District
Udaipur, Rajasthan.
(Downloaded on 05/07/2025 at 12:22:31 AM)
[2025:RJ-JP:24571] (11 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]
8. Megha Sharma D/o Umesh Kumar Sharma, Aged About
32 Years, R/o A-265, In Front Of M.k.b. School, Nehru
Nagar, Panipech, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
9. Harshvardhan Singh S/o Hitendra Singh, Aged About 27
Years, R/o 5/321, Rhb Colony, Goverdhan Vilas, Sector-
14, Udaipur, Rajasthan.
10. Ajay Meena S/o Sitaram Meena, Aged About 35 Years,
R/o Plot No. 30, Prabhu Pradhan City, B Block, Jagatpura,
Jaipur, Rajasthan.
11. Amit Kumar S/o Babu Lal Gupta, Aged About 42 Years,
R/o Opposite Of Govt. Girls Sr. Secondary School, Ward
No. 11, Khairthal, District Alwar, Rajasthan.
12. Manish Kundara S/o Ghanshyam Kundara, Aged About 34
Years, R/o B-220, Mahesh Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
13. Jyoti Purohit D/o Ratan Lal Vyas, Aged About 41 Years,
R/o Ii-F/988, Mdv Colony, Bikaner, Rajasthan.
14. Ruchi Gupta D/o Matadeen Gupta, Aged About 27 Years,
R/o Physical Road, In Front Of Income Tax Office,
Shivpuri, Madhya Pradesh.
15. Satveer Singh S/o Kaan Singh, Aged About 28 Years, R/o
A-41, U.i.t. Quarters, Karni Nagar, Lalgarh, District
Bikaner, Rajasthan.
16. Kamlesh Kumar Sharma S/o Laxman Lal Sharma, Aged
About 35 Years, R/o 105, Gavalini, Madhogarh Vaya
Toonga, Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur, Rajasthan.
17. Somendra Meena S/o Jagdish Prasad Meena, Aged About
24 Years, R/o 226-227, Lajpat Nagar, Teelawala,
Jagatpura, Tehsil Sanganer, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
18. Abhishek Chouhan S/o Ganga Sagar Chouhan, Aged
About 26 Years, R/o Panchayat Bhawan Ke Pass, District
Ajmer, Rajasthan.
19. Pankaj Panwar S/o Ramesh Chand Panwar, Aged About 39
Years, R/o Near Bus Stand, Anta, District Baran,
Rajasthan.
20. Vaishali Paliwal D/o Mul Shankar Paliwal, Aged About 25
Years, R/o Brahmpuri, Delwara, Nathdwara, District
Rajsamand, Rajasthan.
21. Mukesh Chandra Gurjar S/o Kishan Lal Gurjar, Aged
About 29 Years, R/o Vpo Pari, Tehsil Bhupalsagar, District
Chittorgarh, Rajasthan.
22. Rajesh Kumar Saini S/o Om Prakash Saini, Aged About 33
Years, R/o Vpo Rampura, Khandela, District Sikar,
Rajasthan.
23. Manish Sharma S/o Brij Bihari Sharma, Aged About 33
Years, R/o C-119, Kardhani Scheme, Kalwar Road,
Govindpura, Jhotwara, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
24. Rahul Choudhary S/o Ram Gopal Choudhary, Aged About
32 Years, R/o 8, Maliyon Ka Mohalla, Jagdamba Colony,
(Downloaded on 05/07/2025 at 12:22:31 AM)
[2025:RJ-JP:24571] (12 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]
Dher Ke Balaji, Sikar Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary,
Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13657/2024
1. Devnarayan S/o Bholi Singh, Aged About 35 Years, R/o
Vpo Punchhari, Tehsil Nagar, District Bharatpur,
Rajasthan.
2. Chandresh Kumar Bachlus S/o Munshi Lal Gupta, Aged
About 32 Years, R/o 50, Vijay Nagar, Behind Neb Housing
Board, Alwar, Rajasthan.
3. Ruksar Banu D/o Abdul Hameed Bagwan, Aged About 34
Years, R/o Gulab Vatika, Bhankrota, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
4. Sunil Kumawat S/o Sita Ram Kumawat, Aged About 26
Years, R/o Vpo Kajipura, Tehsil Phulera, Sambhar Lake,
Jaipur, Rajasthan.
5. Jai Prakash S/o Mangal Chand, Aged About 29 Years, R/o
Vpo Posani, Tehsil Laxmangarh, Via Kudan, District Sikar,
Rajasthan.
6. Lekhraj Sharma S/o Goverdhan Lal Sharma, Aged About
24 Years, R/o Girdharwas Ki Dhani, Jatwara, Tehsil Bassi,
District Jaipur, Rajasthan.
7. Amit Kumar S/o Ranjeet Kumar, Aged About 30 Years,
R/o Village Garhi, Tehsil Ramgarh, District Alwar,
Rajasthan.
8. Sahil Ikbal S/o Suleman Khan, Aged About 23 Years, R/o
Gomati Colony, Near Bayana Mod, District Karauli,
Rajasthan.
9. Naresh Chauhan S/o Mohan Lal Chauhan, Aged About 29
Years, R/o Vpo Padikala, Tehsil And District Banswara,
Rajasthan.
10. Sanjay Kumar Sharma S/o Shrawan Kumar Sharma, Aged
About 30 Years, R/o Ward No. 09, Vpo Dholasari, Tehsil
Dantaramgarh, District Sikar, Rajasthan.
11. Shankar Lal Bochalya S/o Banwari Lal Bochalya, Aged
About 28 Years, R/o Village Kanwarpura, Post Itawa,
Tehsil Kishangarh Renwal, District Jaipur, Rajasthan.
12. Kalu Ram Saini S/o Kishan Lal Saini, Aged About 31
Years, R/o Niwai Darwaza, Purani Tonk, District Tonk,
Rajasthan.
13. Manvendra Upman S/o Roshan Lal, Aged About 30 Years,
R/o Village Dhanwara, Tehsil Kumher, District Bharatpur,
Rajasthan.
14. Krishna Kumar Singodia S/o Kanhaiya Lal Singodia, Aged
(Downloaded on 05/07/2025 at 12:22:31 AM)
[2025:RJ-JP:24571] (13 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]
About 33 Years, R/o Near Railway Gate No. 4, Chandbas,
Sujangarh, District Churu, Rajasthan.
15. Aakash Dan S/o Narpat Dan, Aged About 26 Years, R/o
Village Charanwas, Post Jakhari, Tehsil Raniwara, District
Jalore, Rajasthan.
16. Pratik Sarin S/o Dhirender Swaroop Sarin, Aged About 37
Years, R/o 229/1, Mateshwari Bhawan, Church Hall Road,
Christian Ganj, District Ajmer, Rajasthan.
17. Vikas Rawat S/o Gopiram, Aged About 23 Years, R/o
Rawata Wali Dhani, Putti, Kotputli, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
18. Shubham Kumawat S/o Banwari Lal Kumawat, Aged
About 24 Years, R/o 68, Govind Nagar, Dcm, Vaishali
Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
19. Bhagawati Prasad Malav S/o Banshi Lal Malav, Aged
About 36 Years, R/o A-143, Vardhman Nagar, Balita Main
Road, Kunhadi, District Kota, Rajasthan.
20. Pravendra Choudhary S/o Vijay Singh, Aged About 28
Years, R/o 147, Tilak Nagar, Near Heeradas Circle,
Bharatpur, Rajasthan.
21. Nishant S/o Govind Singh, Aged About 22 Years, R/o
Sujalpur, Nagar, Deeg, Rajasthan.
22. Vinay Gautam S/o Suresh Kumar Sharma, Aged About 32
Years, R/o 4-J-15, Mahaveer Nagar Iii, Kota, Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary,
Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13678/2024
1. Himanshu Agarwal S/o Dinesh Kumar Agarwal, Aged
About 23 Years, R/o Village Kootooki, Post Shyaluta,
Tehsil Rajgarh, District Alwar, Rajasthan.
2. Nitesh Kumar Mahala S/o Kalu Ram, Aged About 22
Years, R/o Ward No. 13, Dhani Bhogla Wali, District Sikar,
Rajasthan.
3. Ishawer Lal Nanoma S/o Ram Lal Nanoma, Aged About
42 Years, R/o Vpo Garduna, Tehsil Bichhiwara, District
Dungarpur, Rajasthan.
4. Roshan Joshi S/o Laxminarayan Joshi, Aged About 31
Years, R/o Vpo Kupra, Tehsil And District Banswara,
Rajasthan.
5. Kanti Lal Patel S/o Jeevan Lal Patel, Aged About 31 Years,
R/o Vpo Chhapi, Tehsil Bichhiwara, District Dungarpur,
Rajasthan.
6. Shubham Agarwal S/o Jeetmal Agarwal, Aged About 29
Years, R/o Bhardur Singh Colony, Near Bhardur Singh Ji
(Downloaded on 05/07/2025 at 12:22:31 AM)
[2025:RJ-JP:24571] (14 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]
Ki Murti, District Churu, Rajasthan.
7. Arvind Kumar S/o Radhakishan Nagar, Aged About 32
Years, R/o Village Dhaturiya, Post Badgaon, Tehsil Anta,
District Baran, Rajasthan.
8. Harshvardhan Singh Rao S/o Gopal Singh Rao, Aged
About 27 Years, R/o 39, Tulsi Nagar, Chandra Colony, Old
Rto Road, Pratap Nagar, Udaipur, Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary,
Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14072/2024
1. Prashant Singodiya S/o Prem Singh Singodiya, Aged
About 37 Years, R/o Laxmi Chand Suman, Purani Dhani
Mandi, Near Shivam Sarvodya School, District Baran,
Rajasthan.
2. Lalit Kishor S/o Brijmohan, Aged About 31 Years, R/o
Village Gunjara, Post Kanwas, Tehsil Kanwas, District
Kota, Rajasthan.
3. Laxman Swami S/o Ramniwas Swami, Aged About 26
Years, R/o Govind Nagar, Malpura Road, Dudu, District
Jaipur, Rajasthan.
4. Roshan Lal Meena S/o Ramkaran Meena, Aged About 29
Years, R/o 16 Tatkaleswar Puri Hida Ki Mori Ramganj
Bazar, District Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary,
Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14177/2024
1. Ashish Sahu S/o Raj Bihari Sahu, Aged About 28 Years,
R/o 47, Prem Nagar Extension, Riddhi Siddhi Chouraha,
Gopalpura Byepass, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. Bhawana Kumawat D/o Premprakash Kumawat, Aged
About 26 Years, R/o Dwarka Nagar, Lane No. 1, Chorasiya
Was Road, Vaishali Nagar, Ajmer, Rajasthan.
3. Pramod Kumawat S/o Ram Swaroop Kumawat, Aged
About 35 Years, R/o Jai Balaji Furnitures, Opposite Barala
Marriage Garden, Ward No. 15, Indra Colony, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
4. Shubhangi Patodiya D/o Ram Ratan Patodiya, Aged About
31 Years, R/o Shri Balaji Garments, New Market City,
(Downloaded on 05/07/2025 at 12:22:31 AM)
[2025:RJ-JP:24571] (15 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]
Sawaimadhopur, Rajasthan.
5. Karmaveer Singh S/o Badri Lal Gehlot, Aged About 26
Years, R/o Bhawani Chowk, Barli Sadri, Tehsil Desuri,
District Pali, Rajasthan.
6. Vishal Ramawat S/o Jagdish Prasad, Aged About 26
Years, R/o Shri Ram Kutir, Khara Kua School, Rajendra
Colony, Jalore, Rajasthan.
7. Laxmi Bohra D/o Umed Singh, Aged About 31 Years, R/o
Ward No. 02, Sri Vijay Nagar, District Sriganganagar,
Rajasthan.
8. Jyotsna Tolambiya D/o Mangi Lal, Aged About 31 Years,
R/o 11/34, Tolambiya Sadan, Kumbha Road, Sector A,
Azad Nagar, Bhilwara, Rajasthan.
9. Priya Kumawat D/o Jairam Kumawat, Aged About 26
Years, R/o Kumawato Ka Mohalla, Manoharpur, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary,
Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14372/2024
1. Shakti Singh Shekhawat S/o Jaidev Singh, Aged About 35
Years, R/o 3, Narayan Vihar-A, Opposite Hukmaram
Nagar, Saini Marg, Harnathpura, Jhotwara, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
2. Rajeev Kumar Goyal S/o Mahaveer Prasad Goyal, Aged
About 43 Years, R/o Plot No. 1, Gali No. 3, Haud, Bari,
District Dholpur, Rajasthan.
3. Laxman Puri Goswami S/o Shiv Puri Goswami, Aged
About 34 Years, R/o Near Dharam Raj Temple, Bhuwana,
Udaipur, Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary,
Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14723/2024
1. Sunita Sharma D/o Jagdish Sharma, Aged About 37
Years, R/o B-4, Shree Ram Nagar, Jaipura, Jagatpura,
Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. Kamal Pareek S/o Puran Mal Sharma, Aged About 31
Years, R/o Ward No. 14, Rawatsar, Ward No. 14, Near
Khetrapal Mandir, Hanumangarh, Rajasthan.
(Downloaded on 05/07/2025 at 12:22:31 AM)
[2025:RJ-JP:24571] (16 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]
----Petitioners
Versus
Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary,
Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15431/2024
1. Ashok Kumar Yadav S/o Ramsingh Yadav, Aged About 26
Years, R/o Vpo Khohari, Tehsil Bansur, District Alwar,
Rajasthan.
2. Deepak Yadav S/o Prakash Chand Yadav, Aged About 25
Years, R/o Village Kharab Narheda, Kotputli, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
3. Rohit Dayal S/o Shiv Dayal Dhaker, Aged About 28 Years,
R/o Main Road, Tehsil Bijoiya, Post Tharoda, District
Bhilwara, Rajasthan.
4. Suresh Kumar S/o Mahendra Kumar, Aged About 25
Years, R/o Ward No. 02, Bhagwan Deidas, District
Hanumangarh, Rajasthan.
5. Mohit Raj Saini S/o Lal Chand Saini, Aged About 34 Years,
R/o Village Badi Dhani, Post Thoi, Tehsil Srimadhopur,
District Sikar, Rajasthan.
6. Rakesh Bishnoi S/o Om Prakash, Aged About 30 Years,
R/o Khilery Fataniyon Ki Dhani, Thata Nagar, Bhajan
Nagar, Jodhpur, Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary,
Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15699/2024
1. Mamta Meena D/o Haari Narayan Meena, Aged About 29
Years, R/o Plot No. 36, Parshvnath Nagar, Near Airport
Sanganer, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. Dipanshu Samaria S/o Bhanwar Lal, Aged About 26 Years,
R/o Sector-8, In Front Of Bus Depot, Near Pratap Nagar,
Jaipur, Rajasthan.
3. Namichand Mourya S/o Ganpat Lal Mourya, Aged About
25 Years, R/o 356, Kishan Marg, Naya Khera, Ambabadi,
Jaipur, Rajasthan.
4. Yogesh Upadhyay S/o Santosh Kumar, Aged About 29
Years, R/o F-141, Mdv Colony, Bikaner, Rajasthan.
5. Adish Gautam S/o Chandrashekhar Sharma, Aged About
23 Years, R/o Sunaro Ka Mohalla, Chechat, District Kota,
Rajasthan.
(Downloaded on 05/07/2025 at 12:22:31 AM)
[2025:RJ-JP:24571] (17 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]
6. Hemant Katrawat S/o Lakhan Lal Meena, Aged About 31
Years, R/o 33 Prem Nagar, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
7. Udai Singh Sisodiya S/o Gordhan Singh Sisodiya, Aged
About 28 Years, R/o Krishi Mandi Ke Samne, Kalyanpura,
Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur, Rajasthan.
8. Dilip Kumar Koli S/o Amba Lal Koli, Aged About 34 Years,
R/o Adarsh Nagar, Gali No. 8, Kota Road, Bhilwara,
Dausa, Rajasthan
9. Rakesh Sharma S/o Ramesh Sharma, Aged About 32
Years, R/o 383, Keshav Nagar, Somnath Nagar, Agra
Road, Dausa, Rajasthan.
10. Indraj Meena S/o Narayan Meena, Aged About 30 Years,
R/o Village Bhat Ka Bas, Post Raisar, Tehsil Andhi District
Jaipur, Rajasthan.
11. Swetha D/o Khuma Ram, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Salwa
Kalan, Jodhpur, Rajasthan.
12. Vinita Arora D/o Ram Ratan Arora, Aged About 33 Years,
R/o A-7, Marwar Nagar, Behind Railway Station,
Mahamandir, Jodhpur, Rajasthan.
13. Mangi Lal S/o Gopi Kishan, Aged About 26 Years, R/o
Newari, Tehsil Pachpadra, Kalyanpura, District Barmer,
Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary,
Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15830/2024
1. Bhavna Sharma D/o Late Shri Indra Prakash Sharma,
Aged About 33 Years, R/o A-408 Anand Lok 1St
Gajadharpura Road, Kalwar, District Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. Pankaj Modi S/o Ved Prakash Modi, Aged About 34 Years,
R/o Opp. 42, Adarsh Colony, Daudpur, Alwar, Rajasthan.
3. Ankit Singh S/o Ramesh Singh, Aged About 25 Years, R/o
A-6, Deoli Arab Road, Pragati Nagar, Borkhera, Kota,
Rajasthan.
4. Ashish Khandelwal S/o Satya Narayan Khandelwal, Aged
About 29 Years, R/o 3 By 3, Ganesh Talab, Dadabari,
Kota, Rajasthan.
5. Kapil Nagar S/o Shankar Lal Nagar, Aged About 30 Years,
R/o Village Pipliya Jagir, Post Khopar, Tehsil Chhabra,
District Baran, Rajasthan.
6. Varsha Pathak D/o Ghanshyam Pathak, Aged About 32
Years, R/o 437 E, R.k. Puram, Kota, Rajasthan.
7. Ayush Sharma S/o Shiv Kumar Sharma, Aged About 27
(Downloaded on 05/07/2025 at 12:22:31 AM)
[2025:RJ-JP:24571] (18 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]
Years, R/o B-35, Sharma Bhawan, Gurjar Ghati, Amer
Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
8. Jeetendra Kumar Meena S/o Sultan Singh, Aged About 30
Years, R/o Village Nawalpura, Post Pathena, Tehsil
Bhusawar, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan.
9. Ajay Kumar Meena S/o Ghanshyam Meena, Aged About
28 Years, R/o Vpo Nangal Sherpur, Tehsil Todabhim,
District Karauli, Rajasthan.
10. Manmohan Suman S/o Mukut Bihari Suman, Aged About
35 Years, R/o Vpo Deoli, Via Kaithoon, Tehsil Kanwas,
District Kota, Rajasthan.
11. Bhanwar Lal S/o Radha Kishan, Aged About 32 Years, R/o
122, Utharadha Bas, Palot, District Nagaur, Rajasthan.
12. Harinder Singh S/o Rameshwar Lal, Aged About 34 Years,
R/o Fatehpur, Sihot Bari, Tehsil Dhod, District Sikar,
Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary,
Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15885/2024
1. Tanuj Mittal S/o Sanjay Kumar, Aged About 27 Years, R/o
Nen Mandi In Front Of Patrol Pump, Station Road,
Hindaun City.
2. Amit Kumar Meena S/o Ramswaroop Meena, Aged About
25 Years, R/o Vpo Gumanpura The Sikrai District Dausa.
3. Abhishek Yadav S/o Radhyshyam Yadav, Aged About 23
Years, R/o Vpo Khedi Milk Via Kishangarh Renwal Teh
Kishangarh Renwal, District Jaipur.
4. Manmohan Sharma S/o Kailash Chand Sharma, Aged
About 25 Years, R/o Village Shri Govindpura Post
Banasthali Vidyapeeth, Tahsil-Niwai District Tonk.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of
Information Technologies And Communications,
Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Rajasthan Subordinate And Ministerial Services Selection
Board (Rsmssb), Through Its Secretary, State Institute Of
Agriculture Management Premises, Durgapura, Jaipur-
302018, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15946/2024
1. Gajendra Sharma S/o Gopal Lal Sharma, Aged About 34
(Downloaded on 05/07/2025 at 12:22:31 AM)
[2025:RJ-JP:24571] (19 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]
Years, R/o 79, Anand Vihar-B, Dadi Ka Phatak, Benar
Road, Jhotwara, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. Vijay Sharma S/o Hari Prasad Sharma, Aged About 34
Years, R/o Gurjar Mohalla, Tonk Road, Kherda,
Sawaimadhopur, Rajasthan.
3. Suresh Kumar S/o Hemraj, Aged About 29 Years, R/o
Near Sbs Library, Karanpur, Post Srikaranpur, District
Sriganganagar, Rajasthan.
4. Manoj Kumar S/o Ratan Lal, Aged About 31 Years, R/o
Village Narsara, Tehsil Fatehpur Bathod, Sikar, Rajasthan.
5. Saead Khan S/o Ayyub Khan, Aged About 29 Years, R/o
Nana Chok, Chawand, Tehsil Sarada, District Udaipur,
Rajasthan.
6. Balwant Singh S/o Inder Singh, Aged About 34 Years, R/o
Ward No. 11, 10 Slw, Silwala Khurd, Hanumangarh,
Rajasthan.
7. Rakesh Kumar Sharma S/o Shimbhu Dayal Sharma, Aged
About 26 Years, R/o Village Sabalpura, Post Dola Ka Bass,
Via Kaladera, Tehsil Chomu, District Jaipur, Rajasthan.
8. Mani Lal Damor S/o Dungar Lal Damor, Aged About 36
Years, R/o Village Annapura, Post Charwara, Block
Jhonthari, Tehsil Jhonthari, District Dungarpur, Rajasthan.
9. Dinesh Yadav S/o Kanhaiya Lal Yadav, Aged About 31
Years, R/o Village Mundgasa, Post Rc Khera, Tehsil
Hindoli, District Bundi, Rajasthan.
10. Mamta Meena D/o Sitaram Meena, Aged About 31 Years,
R/o 6/307, Krishna Marg, Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
11. Vishvajeet Singh S/o Prathvi Singh, Aged About 28 Years,
R/o 51, Surya Colony, Near Emmanuel Mission School,
Naya Gaon Road, Pali, District Pali, Rajasthan.
12. Kishan Lal S/o Girdhari Lal Mali, Aged About 27 Years, R/o
Maliyon Ka Bas, Bap, District Jodhpur, Rajasthan.
13. Pawan Verma S/o Prabhulal Verma, Aged About 31 Years,
R/o Ward No. Ward No. 13, Lal Bai Mohalla, Vpo Mangrol,
District Baran, Rajasthan.
14. Priya Vedi Verma D/o Shimbhu Dayal Vedi, Aged About 34
Years, R/o Anshul Villa B-2 -59 Sudarshan Nagar
Pawanpuri, District Bikaner
----Petitioners
Versus
Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary,
Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16037/2024
1. Saurabh Sharma S/o Premi Sharma, Aged About 29
(Downloaded on 05/07/2025 at 12:22:31 AM)
[2025:RJ-JP:24571] (20 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]
Years, R/o Surjeet Nagar, Nursery Road, Near Shani Dev
Mandir, District Dholpur, Rajasthan.
2. Pooja Gaur D/o Dal Chand Gaur, Aged About 33 Years,
R/o 251, Chand Bihari Nagar, Khatipura, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
3. Neha Agrawal D/o Rajendra Kumar Agrawal, Aged About
32 Years, R/o E-13, Rps Colony, Gumanpura, Near
Kishorepura, District Kota, Rajasthan.
4. Saorav Dadhich S/o Bajrang Lal Dadhich, Aged About 35
Years, R/o Behind Nsp College, Inside Jassusar Gate,
District Bikaner, Rajasthan.
5. Saurabh Beniwal S/o Bhagirath Beniwal, Aged About 29
Years, R/o Ward No. 13, Village Sikrori, Barani, District
Hanumangarh, Rajasthan.
6. Vaibhav Kumar Meena S/o Chuttan Lal Meena, Aged
About 23 Years, R/o Udai Mode, Hindaun Road, Behind
Central Bank Of India, District Sawaimadhopur,
Rajasthan.
7. Jagdeesh Meghwal S/o Punam Chand Meghwal, Aged
About 26 Years, R/o Ward No. 8, Kheechiya, Bikaner,
Rajasthan.
8. Meenu Kanwar Shekhawat D/o Mool Singh Shekhawat,
Aged About 36 Years, R/o Ward No. 23, Churu, District
Churu, Rajasthan.
9. Ankita Jangid D/o Mahaveer Prasad Jangid, Aged About
32 Years, R/o Aadarsh Colony, Behind Bhagirath Hostel,
Near Modi College, Sikar, Rajasthan.
10. Jitendra Kumar Khemani S/o Bhagwandas Khemani, Aged
About 41 Years, R/o 1165/25, Isaia Mohalla, Dayanand
Colony, Ajmer, Rajasthan.
11. Suresh Kumar Jangu S/o Ram Singh, Aged About 32
Years, R/o Vpo Bhainsawa, Tehsil Kishangarh Renwal,
Jhotwara, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary,
Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16043/2024
1. Vishnu Sharma S/o Mahesh Chand Sharma, Aged About
30 Years, R/o A-51, Balaji Vihar-16, Badh Shyopur,
Ashawala, Vatika Road, Sanganer, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. Idris Khan S/o Bashir Khan, Aged About 27 Years, R/o
Mohammedpura, Nagaur, Rajasthan.
3. Seema Choudhary D/o Ram Chandra Choudhary, Aged
About 25 Years, R/o Plot No. 53, Brij Mandal Colony, 100
(Downloaded on 05/07/2025 at 12:22:31 AM)
[2025:RJ-JP:24571] (21 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]
Feet Road, Kalwar Road, Jhotwara, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
4. Shivang Sharma S/o Jainath Sharma, Aged About 23
Years, R/o 629, Mahaveer Nagar, Tonk Road, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
5. Pankaj Kumar Bairwa S/o Babu Lal Bairwa, Aged About 25
Years, R/o Village Narayanpura, Post Peechupara Kalan,
Dausa, Rajasthan.
6. Pawan Kumar Bairwa S/o Bhoma Ram Bairwa, Aged
About 31 Years, R/o Plot No. A-19, Gayatri Nagar, Agra
Road, Dausa, Rajasthan.
7. Anand Singh Gurjar S/o Amar Singh Gurjar, Aged About
33 Years, R/o Opposite Bharat Petrol Pump, Tilak Nagar,
Jaipur Road, Bikaner, Rajasthan.
8. Ravishankar Ankodiya S/o Murari Lal, Aged About 32
Years, R/o Vpo Amargarh, Tehsil Sapotara, District
Karauli, Rajasthan.
9. Vishvendra Singh S/o Ratipal Singh, Aged About 34 Years,
R/o Shakti Vihar, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
10. Priyanka Jain D/o Lalit Jain, Aged About 29 Years, R/o
Plot No. 1, Hanuman City B, R.k. Puram, Sitapura, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary,
Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16278/2024
Chetan Jaiman S/o Gajanand Jaiman, Aged About 30 Years, R/o
Jain Mandir Mohalla, Mojpur, Po Mauj Pur, Distt. Alwar,
Rajasthan- 321633
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary,
Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura,
Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Chairman,
Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura,
Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16406/2024
Vikas Sharma S/o Rajesh Sharma, Aged About 31 Years, R/o
90B Anand Vihar A Benad Road, Dadi Ka Pahtak, Jhotwara,
District Jaipur.
----Petitioner
Versus
(Downloaded on 05/07/2025 at 12:22:31 AM)
[2025:RJ-JP:24571] (22 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of
Information Technologies And Communications,
Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Rajasthan Subordinate And Ministerial Services Selection
Board (Rsmssb), Through Its Secretary, State Institute Of
Agriculture Management Premises, Durgapura, Jaipur-
302018, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16479/2024
Harjeet Singh Vijaywal S/o Shri Yadram Vijaywal, Aged About 34
Years, R/o Basant Vihar Colony, Riico Road, Sector No. 2,
Bharatpur (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of
Personnel, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.).
2. Secretary, Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Rajya Krishi
Prabandh Sansthan Parisar, Durgapura, Jaipur Rajasthan.
3. President, Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Rajya Krishi
Prabandh Sansthan Parisar, Durgapura, Jaipur Rajasthan.
4. Secretary (Administration) And Commissioner,
Department Of Information Technology And
Communication, I.t. Bhawan, Yojna Bhawan Champus,
Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur (Raj.).
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16482/2024
1. Arjun Bhatia S/o Sohan Lal, Aged About 27 Years, R/o 21
A Paschim Vihar, Keshopura, Bhankrota, District Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
2. Nitin Sharma S/o Jagdish Prasad, Aged About 25 Years,
R/o A-08, Pratap Colony, Somnath Nagar, District, Dausa
Rajasthan.
3. Aman Sharma S/o Manmohan Sharma, Aged About 25
Years, R/o Behind Nagar Dharmshala, Tripoliya Road,
Custom Choraha, Pandit Rameshwar Joshi Ke Samne,
District Banswara, Rajasthan.
4. Manish Sutrakar S/o Sitaram Sutrakar, Aged About 28
Years, R/o 43 Vrindavan Vihar, Mukundpura Road,
Bhankrota, District Jaipur, Rajasthan.
5. Sanjay Kumawat S/o Pappu Lal Kumawat, Aged About 29
Years, R/o B-96/29, Bai Ji Ki Kothi, Jhalana Doongari,
District Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary,
Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur,
(Downloaded on 05/07/2025 at 12:22:31 AM)
[2025:RJ-JP:24571] (23 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]
Rajasthan.
----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16483/2024
1. Suresh Kumar Meena S/o Bhagwan Sahai, Aged About 28
Years, R/o Dhani Pipli Wali, Vpo Khanwas, Tehsil Lawan,
District Dausa, Rajasthan.
2. Seema Meena D/o Ganga Sahay Meena, Aged About 26
Years, R/o Vpo Seedra, Tehsil Newai, District Tonk,
Rajasthan.
3. Anjali Garg D/o Manoj Garg, Aged About 26 Years, R/o
123, Ward No. 24, Naya Bazar, Gangapurcity, District
Sawaimadhopur, Rajasthan.
4. Sonali Khandelwal D/o Hanuman Sahay Khandelwal, Aged
About 33 Years, R/o Plot No. 8, Suraj Nagar, Behind
Kediya House, Nadi Ka Phatak, Murlipura, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
5. Chhabi Natani D/o Kamal Babu Natani, Aged About 24
Years, R/o Ward No. 12, Munim Para, Purani Nagar Palika
Ke Pass, Gangapurcity, Rajasthan.
6. Vikas Sharma S/o Rajesh Sharma, Aged About 31 Years,
R/o 90 B, Anand Vihar-A, Dadi Ka Phatak, Jhotwara,
Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary,
Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16509/2024
Kapil Dattatrey S/o Devi Sahay Dattatrey, Aged About 29 Years,
R/o Dattatrey Chauraha, Jhareda Road, Hindaun City, District
Karauli, Rajasthan 322230.
----Petitioner
Versus
Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary,
Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16546/2024
1. Hitesh Kumar Sharma S/o Ramesh Chand Sharma, Aged
About 24 Years, R/o Village Papri, Post Sothana, Tehsil
Viratnagar, District Jaipur.
2. Rehana Bano W/o Abdul Sakur, Aged About 28 Years, R/o
Ward No. 36, Mohalla Chejaran Char Kutub Masjid Ke
Pass, Jhunjhunu.
3. Rajesh Kumar Meena S/o Gendi Lal Meena, Aged About
(Downloaded on 05/07/2025 at 12:22:31 AM)
[2025:RJ-JP:24571] (24 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]
30 Years, R/o Village Rampura Post Boroda, Tehsil Dausa.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of
Information Technologies And Communications,
Secretraite, Jaipur.
2. Rajasthan Subordinate And Ministerial Services Selection
Board (Rsmssb), Through Its Secretary, State Institute Of
Agriculture Management Premises, Durgapura, Jaipur-
302018, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17350/2024
1. Premraj Mehara S/o Jagdish Narayan Mehara, Aged About
28 Years, R/o Vpo Devgaon, Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
2. Vishanu Singh S/o Mahendra Singh, Aged About 27 Years,
R/o Vpo Pilod, Tehsil Surajgarh, District Jhunjhunu,
Rajasthan.
3. Sonam D/o Daleep Singh, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Shri
Krishan Nagar, Mundawar, District Alwar, Rajasthan.
4. Dharemendra Kumar S/o Ram Pratap, Aged About 35
Years, R/o Vpo Kolsiya, Tehsil Nawalgarh, District
Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan.
5. Narendra Yogi S/o Gopal Lal Yogi, Aged About 30 Years,
R/o Yogi Bhawan, Bus Stand, Sirsi, District Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary,
Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17380/2024
1. Dharmpal Saini S/o Nanchu Ram Saini, Aged About 36
Years, R/o Nopla Ki Dhani, Tehsil Bansur, District Alwar,
Rajasthan.
2. Deepak Gupta S/o Bhagwan Gupta, Aged About 28 Years,
R/o Vpo Rasgan, Tehsil Mundawar, District Alwar,
Rajasthan.
3. Priyanka Kumari D/o Mahipal Singh, Aged About 30 Years,
R/o Ward No. 01, Poddar Pavelian Ke Samne, Station
Road, Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan.
4. Vikram Singh S/o Durjan Singh, Aged About 27 Years,
R/o Village Biramsar, Tehsil Ratangarh, District Churu,
Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
(Downloaded on 05/07/2025 at 12:22:31 AM)
[2025:RJ-JP:24571] (25 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]
Versus
Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary,
Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17405/2024
1. Sachin Dara S/o Zile Singh, Aged About 34 Years, R/o
Vpo Kishorpura, Tehsil Chirawa, District Jhunjhunu,
Rajasthan.
2. Devaram Jangid S/o Ramswaroop Jangid, Aged About 26
Years, R/o Village Bhankrota Khurd, Post Ajairajpura,
Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur, Rajasthan.
3. Shubham Agrawal S/o Rajendra Kumar Agrawal, Aged
About 29 Years, R/o 15, Behind Navjivan Hospital,
Hanuman Vatika, Lalsot, District Dausa, Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary,
Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17701/2024
Tejpal Choudhary S/o Rampal Choudhary, R/o Ward No. 08,
Ramjipura Khurd, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
The Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary,
State Institute Of Agriculture Management Premises, Durgapura,
Rajasthan, Jaipur.
----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17747/2024
1. Ramavtar Meena S/o Bheema Ram Meena, Aged About 38
Years, R/o Village Rang Lal Ka Pura, Tehsil Todabhim,
District Karauli, Rajasthan.
2. Suresh Kumar Meena S/o Mangal Chand Meena, Aged
About 34 Years, R/o P.no. 50, Shri Nath Vihar-I, Uparli
Dhani, Agra Road, Jamdoli, District Jaipur, Rajasthan.
3. Ravindra Pareek S/o Om Prakash Pareek, Aged About 27
Years, R/o Main Bazar Ke Pass, Vpo Nokha, Chandawata,
Tehsil Merta, District Nagaur, Rajasthan.
4. Manish Baira S/o Nanda Ram, Aged About 31 Years, R/o
Village Ramsari, Tehsil Degana, District Nagaur,
Rajasthan.
5. Mayank Pareek S/o Ramdev Pareek, Aged About 34 Years,
R/o Krashi Mandi Road, Tankipura, Degana Junction,
District Nagaur, Rajasthan
(Downloaded on 05/07/2025 at 12:22:31 AM)
[2025:RJ-JP:24571] (26 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]
6. Suresh Kumar S/o Lal Chand, Aged About 35 Years, R/o
Village Devasar, Post Mehrasar Upadhiyan, Via Sahwa,
Tehsil Sardarshahar, District Churu, Rajasthan.
7. Hitesh Sharma S/o Vishwambhar Dayal Sharma, Aged
About 29 Years, R/o 209-C, Nemi Sagar Colony, Vaishali
Marg, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
8. Pankaj Kumar Gupta S/o Naresh Gupta, Aged About 30
Years, R/o Gupta Krishi Yantralaya, Subhash Chowk,
Bayana, Bharatpur, Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary,
Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17757/2024
1. Surendra Jakhar S/o Ganpat Ram Jakhar, Aged About 27
Years, R/o Village Bharkasli, Tehsil Dhod, District Sikar,
Rajasthan.
2. Saroj Kudi D/o Muknda Ram, Aged About 28 Years, R/o
Village Rambaxpura, Tehsil Dhod, District Sikar,
Rajasthan.
3. Nikhil Sharma S/o Girdhari Lal Sharma, Aged About 27
Years, R/o 2/24, Housing Board, Jawahar Nagar,
Bharatpur Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary,
Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18103/2024
1. Harish Charan S/o Narayan Ram, Aged About 29 Years,
R/o Vpo Gadhwara, Tehsil Rohat, District Pali, Rajasthan.
2. Mahesh Bhati S/o Jeetmal Bhati, Aged About 31 Years,
R/o House No. 91, Somana Marg, Vpo Rol, Tehsil Jayal,
District Nagaur, Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary,
Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18615/2024
1. Shiv Prakash Khangar S/o Shankar Lal Khangar, Aged
About 29 Years, R/o Near Of Sr. Secondary School, Ward
(Downloaded on 05/07/2025 at 12:22:31 AM)
[2025:RJ-JP:24571] (27 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]
No. 9, Tehsil Uniyara, District Tonk, Rajasthan.
2. Gagan Kumar S/o Rajesh Kumar, Aged About 26 Years,
R/o 157, Main Road, In Front Of Pnb Bank, Vpo Tatarpur,
District Alwar, Rajasthan.
3. Jyoti Yadav D/o Karmveer Singh, Aged About 32 Years,
R/o Vpo Gunti, Tehsil Buhana, District Jhunjhunu,
Rajasthan.
4. Sourav Parmar S/o Kana Ram Parmar, Aged About 35
Years, R/o Ramdev Colony, Jalore, District Jalore,
Rajasthan.
5. Kaushal Kumar Regar S/o Ramesh Chandra Regar, Aged
About 22 Years, R/o Ambedkar Marg, Regar Mohalla,
Insite Surajpole, District Udaipur, Rajasthan.
6. Mahesh Kumar Khatik S/o Ram Gopal Khatik, Aged About
34 Years, R/o Khatiko Ka Mohalla, Nangal Mode, Kunda,
Amer, District Jaipur, Rajasthan.
7. Devershi Mehta S/o Navneet Mehta, Aged About 34 Years,
R/o 7, Laxmi Narayan Nagar, Savina, District Udaipur,
Rajasthan.
8. Abhishek Swami S/o Parmeshwar Swami, Aged About 28
Years, R/o Behind Old Power House, Aguna Chowk,
District Bikaner, Rajasthan.
9. Shiv Shanker Baria S/o Sharwan Kumar Baria, Aged
About 29 Years, R/o Near Songiri Well, Dhobi Mohalla,
District Bikaner, Rajasthan.
10. Teerth Narayan Verma S/o Keshar Lal Verma, Aged About
34 Years, R/o Plot No. 41, Shree Ram Nagar Colony,
Sanganer, District Jaipur, Rajasthan.
11. Sudesh Kumar Gothwal S/o Jaswant Singh, Aged About
32 Years, R/o Ambedkar Nagar, Behind Khatiko Ki
Dharmsala, Vpo Behror, District Alwar, Rajasthan.
12. Sanjay S/o Satyanarayan, Aged About 27 Years, R/o
Arihant Resort, Dudu Road, Brijlal Nagar, Malpura, District
Tonk, Rajasthan.
13. Sanket Vaishnav S/o Charan Das Vaishnav, Aged About
27 Years, R/o Kansaro Ka Vas, Near Hanuman Mandir,
District Barmer, Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary,
Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 145/2025
1. Rohitash Kumar S/o Bajrang Lal, Aged About 30 Years,
R/o Jejusar, Tehsil Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu,
Rajasthan.
(Downloaded on 05/07/2025 at 12:22:31 AM)
[2025:RJ-JP:24571] (28 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]
2. Shubham Aeron S/o Kailash Chand Gupta, Aged About 29
Years, R/o A-24, Tirupati Nagar, Near Bus Stand, District
Karauli, Rajasthan.
3. Rinku Bairwa S/o Ram Gopal Bairwa, Aged About 26
Years, R/o Village Vyaso Ka Nohra, Post Kojwada, Tehsil
Ramgarh Pachwara, Dausa, Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary,
Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1373/2025
1. Bhoopender Singh Gurjar S/o Siya Ram Gurjar, Aged
About 30 Years, R/o Vpo Kemari Pul Ki Dhani, Tehsil
Nadoti, District Karauli, Rajasthan.
2. Rajpal S/o Narsi Ram, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Vpo
Tesgaon, Tehsil Nadoti, District Karauli, Rajasthan.
3. Bhagya Singh S/o Padam Singh Gurjar, Aged About 29
Years, R/o Vpo Kemari, Tehsil Nadoti, District Karauli,
Rajasthan.
4. Bhooshan Kumar Sharma S/o Shyam Bihari Sharma,
Aged About 31 Years, R/o Ratawali, Tehsil Laxmangarh,
District Alwar, Rajasthan.
5. Rakesh Bishnoi S/o Jisukh Ram Bishnoi, Aged About 30
Years, R/o Near Old Rto Office, Rathkhana Colony,
Bikaner, Rajasthan.
6. Lokesh Badra S/o Meghraj Badra, Aged About 28 Years,
R/o 9E96 D, Indra Gandhi Nagar, Jagtpura, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
7. Ganesh Ram S/o Mangla Ram, Aged About 25 Years, R/o
Village Nanana, Post Jabdi Nagar, Tehsil Nawa City,
Nagour, District Nagaur, Rajasthan.
8. Somesh Kumar Meena S/o Laxmi Narayan Meena, Aged
About 27 Years, R/o Godh Walo Ki Dhani, Khora Meena,
Tehsil Amer, District Jaipur Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary,
Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1409/2025
1. Leela Choyal D/o Bhanwar Lal, Aged About 34 Years, R/o
Bera Kudiya Jetawas Road, Bilara District Jodhpur (Raj.)
2. Anup Prakash S/o Shri Ram Lal, Aged About 40 Years, R/o
(Downloaded on 05/07/2025 at 12:22:31 AM)
[2025:RJ-JP:24571] (29 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]
Uppwe Bhaktiyana, Pauri Road, Near Gb Pant Office,
Srinagar Garhwal, District Pauri Garhwal, Uttarakhand.
3. Udaram S/o Lekhram, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Ward No.
3, Suratgarh, District Sri Ganganagar (Raj.)
4. Hanumana Ram S/o Shri Panna Ram, Aged About 28
Years, R/o Rampura Purava, Tehsil Dhorimanna, District
Barmer (Raj.)
5. Manoj Dadhich S/o Shri Harish Chandra Dadhich, Aged
About 42 Years, R/o Swami Mohalla, Naya Sahar, District
Bikaner (Raj.)
----Petitioners
Versus
Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary,
Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaiuur,
Rajasthan.
----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1606/2025
Mayank Kumar Yadav S/o Kaushik Kumar Yadav, Aged About 34
Years, R/o Narayan Bhavan Bus Stand, Jhalawar, Jhalawar,
Rajasthan
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of
Information Technology And Communication, Government
Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Commissioner And Special Secretary, Department Of
Information Technology And Communication, It Building,
Yojana Bhavan Campus, Tilak Marg, C Scheme, Ashok
Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
3. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary,
Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura,
Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1790/2025
1. Sajan Singh Panwar S/o Dinesh Singh Panwar, Aged
About 30 Years, R/o Vpo Mukta Prasad Colony, District-
Bikaner, Rajasthan.
2. Kailash Kumar Suthar S/o Om Prakash Suthar, Aged
About 30 Years, R/o Vpo Vishwakarma Colony, Gopeshwar
Basti, Bikaner, Rajasthan.
3. Sandeep Tak S/o Hazari Mal Tak, Aged About 36 Years,
R/o Vpo Chambika Thanda, District- Jodhpur, Rajasthan.
4. Neeraj Kumar Gupta S/o Madan Mohan Gupta, Aged
About 36 Years, R/o Vpo Bandariya Ke Balaji, Gangapur
City, Swaimadhopur, Rajasthan.
5. Sagar Mal Poonia S/o Kalyan Mal Poonia, Aged About 33
(Downloaded on 05/07/2025 at 12:22:31 AM)
[2025:RJ-JP:24571] (30 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]
Years, R/o Vpo Harsoli, Via-K Renwal, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary,
Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1908/2025
1. Ramkesh Meena S/o Pratap Meena, Aged About 28 Years,
R/o Vpo Samel, Tehsil Lalsot, District Dausa, Rajasthan.
2. Preeti D/o Surender Kumar, Aged About 31 Years, R/o
Rooppura Kuloth, Khurdh, Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan.
3. Pankaj Kumar S/o Mahaveer Prasad, Aged About 28
Years, R/o Village Ghassu Ka Bas, Post Ghassu,
Laxmangarh, Sikar, Rajasthan.
4. Parakram Singh Rathore S/o Mahaveer Singh Rathore,
Aged About 28 Years, R/o Plot No. 10, Marg No. A-12,
Kailash Nagar, Jhotwara, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary,
Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2078/2025
1. Sunil Kumar Meena S/o Hansraj Meena, Aged About 29
Years, R/o Village Chainpura, Post Galad Kalan, Tehsil
Bonli, District Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan (Roll No.
176393).
2. Pankaj Kumar Nagar S/o Ramdhan Lal Nagar, Aged About
29 Years, R/o Plot No. 119, Puran Vihar Colony,
Boyatawala, Behind Railway Station, Opposite Benar
Phatak, Jaipur, Rajasthan (Roll No. 174890)
3. Jugal Tanwar S/o Premraj Tanwar, Aged About 28 Years,
R/o Tausar Nagaur, Bhitiyanisar Bass, Tausar Nagaur,
District Nagaur, Rajasthan (Roll No. 209428)
4. Tarun Mina S/o Shankar Lal Mina, Aged About 23 Years,
R/o Vpo Jatwara, Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur, Rajasthan
(Roll No. 131394)
5. Rajani Kumari Sameriya D/o Kailash Chand, Aged About
28 Years, R/o Indra Gandhi Nagar, Dcm, District Kota,
Rajasthan (Roll No. 215462)
6. Neetesh Kumar S/o Shriniwas Goswami, Aged About 32
Years, R/o 117/292, Mansarovar, Sector 17, Jhalana
Chhod, Mansarovar, Jaipur, District Jaipur, Rajasthan (Roll
No. 112770)
(Downloaded on 05/07/2025 at 12:22:31 AM)
[2025:RJ-JP:24571] (31 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]
7. Yogesh Prajapat S/o Bhanwarlal Prajapat, Aged About 32
Years, R/o 313, Yadav Mohalla, Bus Stand, Delwara,
Rajsamand, Rajasthan (Roll No. 228916)
----Petitioners
Versus
Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary,
Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5417/2025
1. Neeraj Kumar Joshi S/o Pratap Singh Joshi, Aged About
31 Years, R/o 57, Tehsil Road Maniya, District Dhilpur,
Rajasthan-328024
2. Neetesh Babu S/o Heeralal, Aged About 32 Years, R/o
Sunder Colony, Infront Of Midway Hotel, Sector No. 3, Gt
Road, District Dholpur, Rajasthan-328001.
3. Manu Kumar Sharma S/o Vishnu Kumar Sharma, Aged
About 33 Years, R/o Village And Post Sahroli, Tehsil
Saipau, District Dholpur, Rajasthan-328027.
4. Kailash Chand Regar S/o Mohanlal Regar, Aged About 32
Years, R/o Flat No. 302 Plot No. 90, Shanti Nagar,
Nirmaan Nagar, Jaipur 302019.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary,
Department Of Information Technolony And
Communication, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Secretary, Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini
Mr. Aamir Khan
Dr. T.N. Sharma
Mr. Ashwinee Kumar Jaiman
Mr. Raghu Nandan Sharma
Mr. Shivatma Kumar Tank
Mr. Amitabh Jatav
Ms. Aradhna Swami
Mr. Akshay Singh
Mr. Chain Singh Rathore,
Mr. Akshay Sharma
Mr. Harendra Neel
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajendra Prasad, Advocate
General assisted by
Ms. Dhriti Laddha,
Mr. Tanay Goyal
(Downloaded on 05/07/2025 at 12:22:31 AM)
[2025:RJ-JP:24571] (32 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]
Mr. Yuvraj Samant,
Ms. Neha Amola
Mr. Tilak Vaid
Mr. Sandeep Maheshwari
Mr. Hansraj Kuldeep, AGC
Mr. P.C. Dewanda,
Mr. Ajay Poonia
Mr. Aditya Sharma for
Mr. Sandeep Taneja, AAG
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Judgment
03/07/2025
1. This batch of writ petitions pertains to direct recruitment on
the post of Informatics Assistant, 2023.
2. Under the advertisement dated 16.01.2023, 2730 posts were
advertised, which were increased vide amended advertisement
dated 27.06.2024 and total 3415 posts of Informatics Assistant
through advertisement dated 16.01.2023 and amended
advertisement dated 27.06.2024 were notified by the Rajasthan
Subordinate and Ministerial Service Selection Board (RSMSSB)
(hereinafter referred to as "the Board").
3. The written examination was conducted by the Board on
21.01.2024. The written examination is of 100 marks comprising
one question paper containing 150 objective type questions.
4. Preliminary answer key was published by the Board on
02.02.2024, then Board invited objections from the candidates
during the period 05.02.2024 to 07.02.2024 vide Public Notice
dated 02.02.2024.
5. On behalf of respondent-Board, reply to the writ petition has
been filed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16144/2024 and with the
(Downloaded on 05/07/2025 at 12:22:31 AM)
[2025:RJ-JP:24571] (33 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]
consent of counsel for respondents, same reply is treated as a
standard reply to all writ petitions.
As per reply to the writ petition, filed by the Board, as many
as against 89 questions, objections were submitted by the
candidates. Objections were sent to the Subject Experts, who
thoroughly examined the objections and considered with the help
of authorized and standard text books and other material available
on various websites. In furtherance to the report of Expert
Committee, out of 89 questions, answers of 80 questions, as
indicated in the preliminary answer key, were affirmed; answer of
two questions including (Question No. 125) were changed and
seven questions were deleted. Thereafter, final answer key was
published on 01.07.2024 and on the same day, final result was
also declared.
6. It is noteworthy that although initially in the writ petitions,
answers of various questions were disputed, however, during
course of arguments, counsel for petitioners have confined to the
answers of only five questions, referred hereinbelow bearing
Questions No.12, 50, 89, 125 & 127 and a joint prayer has been
made from the side of petitioners that a fresh Committee of
Subject Experts be constituted in order to revisit the correctness
of the answers of such five questions under consideration and as
per the report of Expert Committee, the final result of present
competitive examination be revised accordingly.
7. Since counsel for both parties admit that answers in respect
of only five questions bearing No. 12, 50, 89, 125 and 127 is
under challenge, hence, with the consent of counsel for both
(Downloaded on 05/07/2025 at 12:22:31 AM)
[2025:RJ-JP:24571] (34 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]
parties, all the writ petitions have been heard together and would
stand decided by this common order.
8. Heard counsel for both parties and perused the pleadings so
also the other material placed on record.
9. It is noteworthy that out of five questions, answer of one
question No.125 in the final answer key has been changed
whereas the answers of question Nos. 12, 50, 89 and 127 are
same, as was indicated in the preliminary answer key. The
tabulation thereof is as under:-
S.No. Question Preliminary Final Answer Status
No. Answer Key dated Key dated
02.02.2024 01.07.2024
1. 12 C C Unchanged
2. 50 A A Unchanged
3. 89 A A Unchanged
4. 125 C B Changed
5. 127 B B Unchanged
10. The five questions from the question paper, as placed on
record in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16144/2024, are being
reproduced hereunder:-
"12. LCD Panels or flat panel display uses the property of
__.
(A) Fiter
(B) Thickness
(C) Light
(D) Size
(E) Question not attempted
50. Which of the following is used while working on Touch
pad?
(A) Finger
(B) Pencil
(C) Stylus
(D) Gloves
(E) Questions not attempted
(Downloaded on 05/07/2025 at 12:22:31 AM)
[2025:RJ-JP:24571] (35 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]
89. In a Word document, Simrat has to display the list of
online sites which can further be used by a student for preparing a
research paper on, "The Effect of Social Media on behaviour of
Students." Which feature of the word is the best suitable to
prepare the list?
(A) Linking
(B) Bullets
(C) Numbering
(D) Graph
(E) Question not attempted
125. I am a Memory device. I am composed of transistors and
capacitors. I am able to access the data fast. Who am I?
(A) Dynamic ROM
(B) Static RAM
(C) Dynamic RAM
(D) Static ROM
(E) Question not attempted
127. While transmission of data from a sender to receiver using
Modern on Internet, the data is first converted to ____ from
____.
(A) Analog, Analog
(B) Analog, Digital
(C) Digital, Analog
(D) Digital, Digital
(E) Question not attempted"
11. Counsel for petitioners have relied upon the relevant pages
from the book of Board of Secondary Education and NCERT, book
of Fundamentals of Computers written by E Balagurusamy
Member of UPSC, material from Google research, text book of
Class IX under subject Information and Communication
Technology as also few of the replies to the disputed questions
sent by IITs, NITs and other institutions, in order to suggest that
answers in respect of above five questions, which have been
finalized by the Board in the final answer key, are incorrect and do
not match with the standard text books and other material, hence,
such questions be referred to a fresh Committee of expert to re-
consider the final answer and as per the Report of Expert
Committee, the final result may be revisited/revised. The main
(Downloaded on 05/07/2025 at 12:22:31 AM)
[2025:RJ-JP:24571] (36 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]
thrust of argument is in respect of change of answer of Question
No. 125 from (C) to (B) in the final answer key.
12. Reliance has been placed by counsel for petitioners to the
judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Vanshika Yadav
Vs. Union of India [(2024) 10 SCC 641] decided on
23.07.2024 and the judgment passed by the Rajasthan High Court
at Jaipur in case of Ramdhan Kumawat Vs. The State of
Rajasthan S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10622/2014 decided
on 18.11.2014.
13. Learned Advocate General assisted by Advocate Mr. Yuvraj
Samant has vehemently repelled the submissions made by
counsel for petitioners and it has been argued that the answer of
Question No.125 has been changed, following the Report of
Subject Experts. The answers of remaining four questions as
indicated in the final answer key are also outcome of the Report of
Subject Experts. It has been pointed out that Subject Experts
have considered the authentic material and after analyzing the
objections thoroughly, have framed their opinion to sustain the
answers of questions No.12, 50, 89 and 127 while suggested
answer No. (B) as correct answer to the question No. 125. Further,
it has been argued that there is no allegation of arbitrariness,
biasness or malafides against the Subject Experts or against
Board, hence, the prayer to form a new Committee of Subject
Experts is hypothetical and without any basis as much as
unwarranted in the facts of the present cases.
14. In addition to above, it has been argued that the
respondents have completed the recruitment process including the
written examination and typing test in a transparent and fair
(Downloaded on 05/07/2025 at 12:22:31 AM)
[2025:RJ-JP:24571] (37 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]
manner and due procedure was followed by inviting the objections
against the preliminary answer key. Thereafter, the objections
submitted by the candidates have been considered by the
Committee of Subject Experts and subsequently, only the final
answer key and the final result of the present recruitment have
been declared.
15. It has been argued that the scope of judicial review, in
matters relating to challenge to the answers of academic
questions asked in the public examination, is extremely limited
and very very narrow, which ordinarily may not be exercised by
the High Court while exercising jurisdiction under Article 226 of
the Constitution of India, unless and until a clear case of apparent
error on the face value of the final answer of a questionable
question is made out, that too without applying any inferential
process of reasoning or by applying the process of rationalization.
In support of submission, oft-quoted and landmark judgments of
the Hon'ble Supreme Court have been relied upon and referred:-
(i) Ran Vijay Singh and Ors. Vs. State of Uttar
Pradesh and Ors. [(2018) 2 SCC 357]
(ii) Vikesh Kumar Gupta and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan
and Ors. [(2021) 2 SCC 309]
(iii) Judgment dated 25.08.2023 delivered in Surjan Lal
Dhawan and Ors. Vs. The State of Rajasthan and
Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4777/2021, which
has been affirmed by the Division Bench in Sanjay
Kumar Bhaskar Vs. The State of Rajasthan : D.B.
Special Appeal Writ No. 636/2024 vie order dated
17.03.2025.
16. Heard. Considered.
17. Having considered the rival submissions and obtaining
guidance from the case laws referred by respective counsels, this
(Downloaded on 05/07/2025 at 12:22:31 AM)
[2025:RJ-JP:24571] (38 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]
Court finds that it is not in dispute that after declaration of
preliminary answer key by the respondent-Board on 02.02.2024,
as per prescribed procedure, objections against the answers
suggested in the preliminary answer key to 150 questions, were
invited by the Board vide Press Note dated 02.02.2024. The
window period to submit objections by the candidates from
05.02.2024 to 07.02.2024 was provided. Thereafter, the
objections, which were received by the Board, were sent to the
Subject Experts for consideration and as per the report of the
Subject Experts, the answer of question No. 125 was changed
from (C) to (B) whereas the answers of other questions No.12, 50,
89 & 127 were kept unchanged in the final answer key dated
01.07.2024.
18. This Court finds that the counsel for petitioners have referred
and relied upon few of the text books and replies by institutions,
referred in Para No.8, before this Court to depict that the correct
answer of question No. 125 is (C), which has wrongly been
changed to (B) due to which the merits of petitioners in this
competitive examination, have adversely suffered. In respect of
answers to other questions as a whole, counsel for petitioners
have also relied upon few text books of another authors and
material, but from the side of petitioners, no allegations of any
arbitrariness, biasness or malafides have been levelled against the
Board or against the Subject Experts to whom Board sent the
objections to give final opinion. It is evident that the final answer
key published by the Board on 01.07.2024 was finalized as per the
report of opinion of the Subject Experts. A copy of report by the
Subject Experts has been shown by the Advocate General to the
(Downloaded on 05/07/2025 at 12:22:31 AM)
[2025:RJ-JP:24571] (39 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]
Court during course of arguments, which goes to show that
Subject Experts relied upon the authentic material. The relevant
sources of materials relied upon by the Subject Experts are as
under:-
(i) https://www.diffen.com/difference/Dynamic_random-
access_memory_vs_Static_random-access_memory
(ii) Semiconductor Devises Physics and Technology
S.M. SZE and M.K. LEE
JOHN WILEY & SONS, INC ISBN 978-0470-53794-7
Link: Page 172 First Paragraph Line 4
“The mataloxide semiconductor field-effect transistor
(MOSFET) is composed of an MOS capacitor and two p-n
junctions placed immediately adjacent to the MOS
capacitor”
(iii) Modern Semiconductor Devises for Integrated
Circuits
Chenming Calvin Hu
Prentice Hall 2010 ISBN: 9780136085256,
0136085252
Link: Page 158 Figure 5.2
“An MOS transistor is an MOS capacitor with PN
junctions at two ends:
(iv) Semiconductor Physics and Devises
Donald A. Neamen
McGraw-Hill, Fourth Edition, 2011 ISBN 978-0-07-
352958-5
Link: Page 371, Fourth Last Line
“The MOS capacitor is the heart of the MOSFET”
(v) Semiconductor device fundamentals.
Pierret, R.F.
Addison-Wesley, Second Edition, 1996
Link: Page 621, Chapter 17, Section 17.1
“Physically, the MOSFET is essential nothing more
than an MOS-Capacitor with two pn junctions placed
immediately adjacent to the regions of the semiconductor
controlled by the MOS-gate.
(vi) MOS Capacitor and MOS Transistors: The MOS
transistors (used in SRAM) contain MOS Capacitor as part
them. Specifically, the MOS Capacitor is a fundamental
part which formed between the gate (metal), oxide
(insulating layer), and semiconductor (channel) of the
transistor, and plays an essential role in controlling the
flow of current.
(Downloaded on 05/07/2025 at 12:22:31 AM)
[2025:RJ-JP:24571] (40 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]
Before finalizing the answers of five questions under
consideration in this batch of writ petitions, the Subject Experts
have applied their mind and have taken into consideration the
authentic material and text books, to change the answer of
question No. 125 and to keep the answers of other questions No.
12, 50, 89 and 127 unchanged, from the answers suggested in the
preliminary answer key.
19. In the opinion of this Court, no clear cut case to show the
answers of five questions referred hereinabove as apparently
wrong, has been made out by the petitioners. This Court is not an
Expert nor can act like an Expert to substitute the opinion of the
Subject Experts and there is a jurisdictional constrain under Article
226 of the Constitution of India, to examine the correctness of the
answers by analyzing the material, relied upon by the counsel for
petitioners in respect of five questions, which are under
consideration in this batch of writ petitions. The material which
has been taken into consideration by the Subject Experts, to
finalize the answers of five questions under consideration, has not
been stated to be unauthentic or unreliable. No prima facie case,
to constitute a fresh Committee of Experts to revisit answers of
five questions, is make out by petitioners.
20. It is neither the case of petitioners that the written
examination was not conducted in fair and transparent manner
nor it is the case that the process of recruitment suffers from any
leaks of paper or other kinds of infirmities. The basis of filing
these writ petitions is only that petitioners are not happy and do
not have consensus with the final answers, indicated in the final
answer key in respect of five questions under consideration.
(Downloaded on 05/07/2025 at 12:22:31 AM)
[2025:RJ-JP:24571] (41 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]
Merely, for the reason that few of the aspirants do not have
consensus with the final answer key in respect of few questions,
the opinion and report of Subject Experts extended on the basis of
thorough research and subjective material concerned, may not be
assumed to be incorrect or doubtful. The scope of judicial review,
in this respect cannot be allowed to be expanded, merely on the
prayer of few of the aspirants because they rely on some other
material, more so, when stack of thousands of aspirants is
involved in respect of a public employment competitive
examination and the material taken into consideration by the
Subject Experts, is not proved to be unauthentic/unreliable.
21. The grey area of interference, to re-evaluate or scrutinize the
answer sheet of the public examination, as has been culled out by
the Supreme Court in case of Kanpur University Vs. Samit
Gupta [(1983) 4 SCC 309], which has been followed in case of
West Bengal Central School Service Commission and Ors.
Vs. Abdul Halim [(2019) 18 SCC 39] and by the Coordinate
Bench of this Court in case of Surjan Lal Dhawan (supra) as
also by the Division Bench, is not available before this Court as it
is difficult to discern and hold that the final answers of five
questions, as finalized by the Subject Experts and shown in the
final answer key dated 01.07.2024, are apparently incorrect/
wrong nor the correctness/ incorrectness of answers of such
questions can be finalized on their face value, as per the material
placed on record by the petitioners. The applicability of the
principle of applying the process of reasoning is also
impermissible. For ready reference, the relevant portion of Para
No. 16 of the judgment reads as under:-
(Downloaded on 05/07/2025 at 12:22:31 AM)
[2025:RJ-JP:24571] (42 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]
“16……..the key answer should be assumed
to be correct unless it is proved to be wrong and
that it should not be held to be wrong by an
inferential process of reasoning or by a process
of rationalization. It must be clearly
demonstrated to be wrong, that is to say, it must
be such as no reasonable body of men well-
versed in the particular subject would regard as
correct. In other words, the onus is on the
candidate to clearly demonstrate that the key
answer is incorrect and that too without any
inferential process or reasoning. The burden on
the candidate is therefore, rather heavy and the
constitutional courts must be extremely cautious
in entertaining a plea challenging the correctness
of key answer…………………”
22. In the celebrated judgment of the Apex Court in case of Ran
Vijay Singh And Ors. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors.
[(2018) 2 SCC 357], a two Judge Bench of the Supreme Court
referred to large number of earlier decisions and culled out the
broad principles applicable in such situations, following
observations may be noted:-
30. The law on the subject is therefore, quite
clear and we only propose to highlight a few
significant conclusions. They are:
30.1. If a statute, Rule or Regulation governing
an examination permits the re-evaluation of an
answer sheet or scrutiny of an answer sheet as a
matter of right, then the authority conducting the
examination may permit it;
30.2. If a statute, Rule or Regulation governing
an examination does not permit re-evaluation or
scrutiny of an answer sheet (as distinct from
prohibiting it) then the Court may permit re-
evaluation or scrutiny only if it is demonstrated
very clearly, without any “inferential process of
reasoning or by a process of rationalisation” and
only in rare or exceptional cases that a material
error has been committed;
30.3. The Court should not at all re-evaluate or
scrutinize the answer sheets of a candidate – it
has no expertise in the matter and academic
matters are best left to academics;
30.4. The Court should presume the correctness
of the key answers and proceed on that
assumption; and
(Downloaded on 05/07/2025 at 12:22:31 AM)
[2025:RJ-JP:24571] (43 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]
30.5. In the event of a doubt, the benefit should
go to the examination authority rather than to
the candidate.
31. On our part we may add that sympathy or
compassion does not play any role in the matter
of directing or not directing re-evaluation of an
answer sheet. If an error is committed by the
examination authority, the complete body of
candidates suffers. The entire examination
process does not deserve to be derailed only
because some candidates are disappointed or
dissatisfied or perceive some injustice having
been caused to them by an erroneous question
or an erroneous answer. All candidates suffer
equally, though some might suffer more but that
cannot be helped since mathematical precision is
not always possible. This Court has shown one
way out of an impasse – exclude the suspect or
offending question.
32. It is rather unfortunate that despite several
decisions of this Court, some of which have been
discussed above, there is interference by the
Courts in the result of examinations. This places
the examination authorities in an unenviable
position where they are under scrutiny and not
the candidates. Additionally, a massive and
sometimes prolonged examination exercise
concludes with an air of uncertainty. While there
is no doubt that candidates put in a tremendous
effort in preparing for an examination, it must
not be forgotten that even the examination
authorities put in equally great efforts to
successfully conduct an examination. The
enormity of the task might reveal some lapse at
a later stage, but the Court must consider the
internal checks and balances put in place by the
examination authorities before interfering with
the efforts put in by the candidates who have
successfully participated in the examination and
the examination authorities. The present appeals
are a classic example of the consequence of such
interference where there is no finality to the
result of the examinations even after a lapse of
eight years. Apart from the examination
authorities even the candidates are left
wondering about the certainty or otherwise of the
result of the examination – whether they have
passed or not; whether their result will be
approved or disapproved by the Court; whether
they will get admission in a college or University
or not; and whether they will get recruited or
not. This unsatisfactory situation does not work
to anybody’s advantage and such a state of
(Downloaded on 05/07/2025 at 12:22:31 AM)
[2025:RJ-JP:24571] (44 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]
uncertainty results in confusion being worse
confounded. The overall and larger impact of all
this is that public interest suffers.
23. In the case of Vikesh Kumar Gupta and Ors. Vs. State Of
Rajasthan and Ors., [(2021) 2 SCC 309], the Supreme Court
after referring to decision in case of Ran Vijay Singh (supra)
had observed as under:-
“16. In view of the above law laid down by this Court,
it was not open to the Division Bench to have
examined the correctness of the questions and the
answer key to come to a conclusion different from
that of the Expert Committee in its judgment
dated12.03.2019. Reliance was placed by the
Appellants on Richal & Ors. v. Rajasthan Public
Service Commission. In the said judgment, this Court
interfered with the selection process only after
obtaining the opinion of an expert committee but did
not enter into the correctness of the questions and
answers by itself. Therefore, the said judgment is not
relevant for adjudication of the dispute in this case.
17. A perusal of the above judgments would make it
clear that courts should be very slow in interfering
with expert opinion in academic matters. In any
event, assessment of the questions by the courts
itself to arrive at correct answers is not permissible.
The delay in finalization of appointments to public
posts is mainly caused due to pendency of cases
challenging selections pending in courts for a long
period of time. The cascading effect of delay in
appointments is the continuance of those appointed
on temporary basis and their claims for
regularization. The other consequence resulting from
delayed appointments to public posts is the serious
damage caused to administration due to lack of
sufficient personnel.”
24. In the opinion of this Court, it is no more res integra that the
scope of interference by the High Court in exercise of powers of
judicial review, relating to the dispute pertaining to correctness of
answers of questions of a public examination, is extremely narrow,
if not completely shut out. The object behind that is to render
(Downloaded on 05/07/2025 at 12:22:31 AM)
[2025:RJ-JP:24571] (45 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]
finality to the process of public employment and even an element
of tolerance of minor error or calibrations is acceptable.
25. The same principle of law has been expounded by the
Coordinate Bench of this Court in exercise of Surjan Lal Dhawan
(supra), which has been affirmed by the Division Bench.
26. As far as case of Ram Dhan Kumawat (supra) relied upon
by the counsel for petitioners is concerned, the Court after
evaluation of the facts of that case, arrived at a conclusion that
the model answer key, prepared by the Expert Committee, is not
in consonance with the standard text books and material,
published by the Education Board. In the present case, this Court
does not find so. Thus, the ratio decidendi as expounded by the
Coordinate Bench of this Court in exercise of Ram Dhan
Kumawat (supra) does not render any support to the case of
petitioners in this batch of writ petitions.
27. As far as the case of Vanshika Yadav (supra) is
concerned, in facts of that case, a leak of NEET UGC – 2024 paper
was an undisputed fact, further the investigation report by CBI
indicated that several students got benefit by playing fraud,
hence, the sanctity of examination itself was found to be vitiated.
In that backdrop of factual matrix, which are not present in this
batch of writ petitions, the Hon’ble Supreme Court constituted an
Expert Committee. Due to distinguishable facts, the ratio
decidendi expounded by the Supreme Court in case of Vanshika
Yadav (supra) also does not render any help/support to the case
of petitioner.
28. The upshot of discussion is that the prayer made in the writ
petitions and the prayer made by counsel for petitioners are
(Downloaded on 05/07/2025 at 12:22:31 AM)
[2025:RJ-JP:24571] (46 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]
devoid of any substance, hence, not liable to be accepted. All writ
petitions are hereby dismissed.
29. Interim stay order(s), staying the appointment of the
selected candidates, is hereby vacated.
30. Stay applications and other pending application(s), if any,
stand disposed of.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J
NITIN/131-177 (Except 175& 176)
(Downloaded on 05/07/2025 at 12:22:31 AM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)