Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur
Wahid S/O Aasam vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jp:27984) on 25 July, 2025
Author: Uma Shanker Vyas
Bench: Uma Shanker Vyas
[2025:RJ-JP:27984]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7837/2025
Sohil S/o Arsad @ Kalu, Aged About 18 Years, 5 Months, R/o
Raniyala Khurd Jhanda, Police Station Utavada, District Palwal,
Hariyana. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail
Deeg)
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
Connected With
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7838/2025
Sahil S/o Farukh, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Khedli Nanu, Police
Station Jurhara, District Deeg (Raj.) (At Present Accused-
Petitioners Confined In Sub Jail Deeg)
—-Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan, Through PP
—-Respondent
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7839/2025
Mushrraf S/o Isak, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Village Satpuda,
Police Station Jurhara, District Deeg (Raj.) (At Present Accused-
Petitioners Confined In Sub Jail Deeg)
—-Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan, Through PP
—-Respondent
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7916/2025
Wahid S/o Aasam, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Kasba Jurhara,
Police Station Jurhara, District Deeg (Raj.) (At Present Accused
Petitioners Confined In Sub Jail Deeg)
—-Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan, Through PP
—-Respondent
(Downloaded on 30/07/2025 at 09:52:21 PM)
[2025:RJ-JP:27984] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-7837/2025]
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anshul Sharma, Adv.
Mr. Ankit Khandelwal, Adv.
For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, P.P. with
Mr. Shubham Kumar Sain, AAAG
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS
Judgment / Order
25/07/2025
These bail applications have been filed by the petitioners
under Section 439 Cr.P.C./483 B.N.S.S. seeking regular bail in FIR
No.177/2025 registered at Police Station Jurhera, District Deeg for
the offence(s) under Section(s) 303(2), 317(2), 319(2), 318(4),
338, 336(3), 340(2), 308(2), 313, 61(2)(a) of BNS & Sections
66D, 67A of IT Act.
Learned counsels for the petitioners submit that the accused-
petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in
these cases. They further submit that the accused-petitioners
have been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the
trial will take long time, hence the petitioners may be enlarged on
bail.
Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has
opposed these bail applications.
Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances
of these cases, but without expressing any opinion on the merits
and demerits of these cases, this Court deems it just and proper
to enlarge the petitioners on bail.
Accordingly, these bail applications filed under Section 439
Cr.P.C./483 B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is ordered that accused-
petitioners namely (1) Sohil S/o Arsad @ Kalu, (2) Sahil S/o
(Downloaded on 30/07/2025 at 09:52:22 PM)
[2025:RJ-JP:27984] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-7837/2025]
Farukh, (3) Mushrraf S/o Isak and (4) Wahid S/o Aasam
shall be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a
personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of
Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the
stipulation that the petitioners shall appear before that Court on
all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do
so.
A copy of this order be placed in each connected file.
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
YOGESH KUMAR /219 to 222
(Downloaded on 30/07/2025 at 09:52:22 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)