Wazahat Khan vs Union Of India on 23 June, 2025

0
1


Supreme Court – Daily Orders

Wazahat Khan vs Union Of India on 23 June, 2025

                                                                      W.P. (Crl.) No. 247/2025




     ITEM NO.48                              COURT NO.11                  SECTION X

                                   S U P R E M E C O U R T O F      I N D I A
                                           RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

                                   WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL)   NO.   247/2025

     WAZAHAT KHAN                                                         PETITIONER(S)

                                                     VERSUS

     UNION OF INDIA & ORS.                                                RESPONDENT(S)


     (IA No. 147634/2025 - EX-PARTE STAY, IA No. 147632/2025 - EXEMPTION
     FROM FILING O.T.)

     Date : 23-06-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                              HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.V. VISWANATHAN
                              HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NONGMEIKAPAM KOTISWAR SINGH
                                    (PARTIAL COURT WORKING DAYS BENCH)


     For Petitioner(s) :
                                       Mr. Dama Seshadri Naidu, Sr. Adv.
                                       Mr. Sankhajit Lal Mitra, Adv.
                                       Mr. Avro Ghosh, Adv.
                                       Ms. Ishita Shrivastava, Adv.
                                       Mr. Vishal Arun Mishra, AOR

     For Respondent(s) :


                              UPON hearing the counsel, the Court made the following
                                                 O R D E R

1. We have heard Mr. Dama Seshadri Naidu, learned senior

counsel for the petitioner. Learned senior counsel draws

attention to the prayer clause at page 64 of the Writ
Signature Not Verified

Digitally signed by
POOJA SHARMA
Petition and submits that he is pressing prayers b, c, d
Date: 2025.06.25
16:40:13 IST
Reason:
and e. He expressly gives up prayers a and f. Prayers b,

1
W.P. (Crl.) No. 247/2025

c, d and e read as follows:

“(b) Issue a writ of mandamus to the effect
that no cognizance of any complaint would be
taken by any court nor any FIR registered by
the police on the cause of action in the
present Writ Petition.


         (c)   Alternatively,          consolidate           all       various
         complains/        FIRs        arising             out        of     the
         petitioner’s         Tweets            in         social           media

registered/made at the behest of the State
Administration, CM, Political parties, Hindu
Sangathan/organization or activists and
highly connected supporters of ruling
political dispensations and other high
profile political people, along with public
and transfer to a neutral State for
completion of investigation.

(d) Issue a writ of prohibition from taking
any coercive steps in relation to FIRs (as
mentioned in prayer a) registered on the
tweets in question;

(e) Grant bail and interim protection to the
petitioner in respect of the FIRs (as
mentioned in prayer a) wherein the petitioner
has been arrested.”

2. Learned senior counsel submits that the First

Information reports filed are in retaliation to the

complaint filed against a social media influencer, who

was arrested and has since been released on bail. To

2
W.P. (Crl.) No. 247/2025

quote Mr. Naidu’s own words “he was perhaps reaping what

he has sown”. Be that as it may. According to the

learned senior counsel, at present following are the

known First Information Reports/complaints registered

against the petitioner for certain old tweets made by

him:

“(i) Kolkata FIR: Golfgreen PS Case No. 76

dated 02.06.2025 u/s Section 196(1)(a)/ 299/

352/ 352(1)(c) of the BNS.

(ii) Kolkata FIR: Complaint at Kolkata’s

Garden Reach Police Station by Sh. Ram Swabhiman

Parishad u/s Section 196(1)(a), Section 299,

Section 352, Section 353(1)(c) IPC r/w Sections

66A and 67 of the IT Act.

(iii) Assam FIR – Panbazar Cyber PS Case No.

08/25 u/s 196(2)/ 298/ 299/ 302/ 152/ 79/ 121(2)

BNS r/w 67 IT Act, 2000.

(iv) Haryana FIR: PS Cyber West, Gurugram; FIR

No. 202 dated 02.06.2025 under section 152/ 192/

196(1)(b)/ 197(1)(c)/ 197(1)(d)/ 299/ 352/

353(2) of BNS and 67 of IT Act.

(v) Delhi FIR: Two criminal complaints were

lodged in New Delhi for communal provocation

aimed at disturbing social harmony.

(vi) Delhi Complaint: Another complaint has been

3
W.P. (Crl.) No. 247/2025

filed in Delhi by Advocate Vineet Jindal with

the Delhi Police.

(vii) Mumbai FIR: An FIR has been registered at

the LT Marg Police Station, Mumbai against

Wazahat Khan, based on a complaint filed by

Ramesh Solanki, who is IT cell president for

monitoring objectionable content on social media

platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and WhatsApp.

According to police, Solanki reported that on

December 13, 2023, Wazahat Khan, using his

Twitter handle @rashidiwazahat, posted

objectionable and obscene content targeting the

Hindu faith and gods.”

3. The earliest FIRs, as per the knowledge of the

petitioner, is at Golf Green PS Case No. 76, dated

02.06.2025 and Garden Reach PS FIR No. 170, dated

16.06.2025. Learned senior counsel also draws attention

to page no. 164 of the paperbook, which, according to

him, is the transcript of the apology video message given

by the petitioner. In short, the learned senior counsel

for the petitioner submits that his tweets were

retaliatory tweets, at the relevant time.

4. Learned senior counsel also submits that the tweets

have been deleted. He further submits that the FIRs span

4
W.P. (Crl.) No. 247/2025

over six States. He cites a number of previous

judgments/orders of this Court, wherein orders to

consolidate the FIR within one State or multiple FIRs of

the State concerned in the said State have been made.

5. Issue notice, returnable on 14.07.2025.

6. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to serve the

Standing Counsel for the States of Assam, West Bengal,

Maharashtra, NCT of Delhi, Haryana and at the Central

Agency, so far as the Union of India is concerned.

7. At this stage, learned senior counsel submits that the

petitioner is in judicial custody in Golf Green PS Case

No. 76/2025, dated 02.06.2025. He also submits that the

petitioner is in police custody in Garden Reach PS Case

no. 170/2025, dated 16.06.2025, wherein he was remanded

to police custody for ten days till 01.07.2025. Learned

senior counsel prays that till the next date of hearing

no further coercive action be taken against the

petitioner in connection with the other FIRs/complaints

filed against the petitioner of similar nature.

8. Considering the prayer, we are inclined to grant the

same. Till the next date of hearing, as an ad-interim

measure, it is directed that no coercive action shall be

taken against the petitioner pursuant to the

FIRs/complaints referred to here-in-above, or the

FIRs/complaints which may be registered against the

5
W.P. (Crl.) No. 247/2025

petitioner in connection with the allegations that are

similar in nature to the FIRs/complaints referred to

here-in-above.

(POOJA SHARMA) (SUDHIR KUMAR SHARMA)
COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)

6



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here