Supreme Court – Daily Orders
Xyz vs Ravi Nagar @Ravindra Singh on 29 July, 2025
Author: Pankaj Mithal
Bench: Pankaj Mithal
SLP (CRL.) NO. 4583/2025
ITEM NO.8 COURT NO.12 SECTION II
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PETITION(S) FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CRL.) NO(S). 4583/2025
[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04-03-2025
in CRA No. 5981/2024 passed by the High Court of Judicature at
Allahabad]
XYZ PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
RAVI NAGAR @RAVINDRA SINGH & ANR. RESPONDENT(S)
(IA No. 79637/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT
IA No. 77675/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED
JUDGMENT IA No. 77674/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
IA No. 79635/2025 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL
DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES IA No. 118581/2025 - VACATING STAY)
Date : 29-07-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ MITHAL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASANNA B. VARALE
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rajul Bhargava, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Kartikeya Bhargava, AOR
Mr. Jasir Aftab, Adv.
For Respondent(s) Mr. Rajiv Dutta, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Fuzail Ahmad Ayyubi, AOR
Mr. Pratyush Singh, Adv.
Mr. Ibad Mushtaq, Adv.
Ms. Akanksha Rai, Adv.
Ms. Gurneet Kaur, Adv.
Mr. Hasan Raza Khan, Adv.
Ms. Rajdipa Behura, Sr. Adv.
Dr. Vijendra Singh, AOR
Mr. Harsh Pratap Shahi, Adv.
Signature Not Verified Mr. Ajay Kumar Prajapati, Adv.
Digitally signed by
geeta ahuja
Date: 2025.07.29
17:33:37 IST
Reason:
UPON hearing the counsel the court made the following
O R D E R
1
SLP (CRL.) NO. 4583/2025
1. The complainant has invoked Article 136 of the
Constitution of India so as to challenge the order dated
04.03.2025 passed by the High Court by which the accused
has been enlarged on bail subject to certain terms and
conditions.
2. The accused in involved in a case under Sections 376-D
and 506 IPC. It is alleged that he committed rape of the
prosecutrix in a car at a parking slot. Admittedly, the
FIR was lodged after about six months of the incident and
the prosecutrix had refused to get herself externally and
internally examined by the medical expert. These are the
two basic grounds on which, the accused has been enlarged
on bail.
3. We are conscious of the fact that the accused has a
strong criminal history and that he may have breached one
of the conditions of the bail in another case, but that
would not be very relevant for the purposes of interfering
with the order enlarging him on bail.
4. In the facts and circumstances of the case, we do not
consider it appropriate to interfere with well reasoned
order of the High Court granting bail to the accused. The
petitioner may explore other remedies before the High
Court may be by way of cancellation of the bail on the
ground of breach of the conditions of the bail or misuse
of the bail order.
2
SLP (CRL.) NO. 4583/2025
5. Accordingly, the Special Leave Petition is dismissed.
6. However, the accused is directed to surrender his
passport before the trial Court within two weeks and to
give an undertaking that he shall not leave the Country
without the leave of the Court.
7. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed
of.
(Nidhi Mathur) (Geeta Ahuja)
Court Master (NSH) Assistant Registrar-cum-PS
3