Yakub Ali Son Of Subrati vs The State Of Rajasthan … on 28 July, 2025

Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur

Yakub Ali Son Of Subrati vs The State Of Rajasthan … on 28 July, 2025

Author: Sameer Jain

Bench: Sameer Jain

[2025:RJ-JP:28295]

        HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                    BENCH AT JAIPUR

        S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 4101/2025

Yakub Ali Son Of Subrati, Aged About 24 Years, Resident Of
Village Piplai, Police Station Bamanwas, Sawai Madhopur. (Raj).
                                                                    ----Petitioner
                                    Versus
1.       The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2.       Sadab Ali Son Of Shri Mahboob Ali, Aged About 28 Years,
         Resident Of Sadar Bazar, Sawai Madhopur, Police Station
         Kotwali, Sawai Madhopur, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj).
                                                                 ----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Girish Khandelwal
For Respondent(s) : Mr. M. S. Shekhawat, PP with
Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Khandelwal, PP

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN

Judgment

28/07/2025

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that limited

role of the petitioner in the alleged incident is that he had

purchased illegal mobiles which were stolen by another person. It

is further submitted that qua the petitioner, the said mobile phone

is already recovered.

It is submitted by the learned Public Prosecutor that the

factual report suggests that in the present crime, the petitioner is

involved however, after conclusion of the investigation, role of the

petitioner will be surfaced, as to whether he is innocent or

otherwise.

(Downloaded on 31/07/2025 at 10:03:26 PM)

[2025:RJ-JP:28295] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-4101/2025]

At this juncture, learned counsel has submitted that an

opportunity be given to the petitioner to put-forth a representation

before the Investigating Officer.

Heard.

This Court in light of the ratio encapsulated in Sakiri Vasu

Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [(2008) 2 SCC 409], and taking

note of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the

petitioner, directs the Investigating Officer to consider the

representation of the petitioner, if filed, strictly in accordance with

law. Investigating Officer is at liberty to draw conclusion as per his

wisdom and taking note of the material facts of the matter in

hand.

In light of the above terms, the present petition is disposed

of. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

(SAMEER JAIN),J

Pooja /48

(Downloaded on 31/07/2025 at 10:03:26 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)