Patna High Court – Orders
Yogendra Mukhiya @ Yogendra Mukhia vs The State Of Bihar on 25 June, 2025
Author: Satyavrat Verma
Bench: Satyavrat Verma
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37574 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-130 Year-2022 Thana- WEST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT
District- West Champaran
======================================================
1. Yogendra Mukhiya @ Yogendra Mukhia Son of Bhuti Mukhiya Village-
Pujahan Patjirwa PS -Sringar District -West Champaran
2. Manoj Kumar @ Manoj Mukhia Son of Yogendra Mukhiya Village- Pujahan
Patjirwa PS -Sringar District -West Champaran
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Manju Devi Wife of Naresh Mukhiya Village- Pujahan Patjirwa PS -Sringar
District -West Champaran
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Kumar Gupta, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Prem Kumar Jha, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 25-06-2025
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case
registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323,
354(B), 392, 386, 387, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the
complainant earlier had instituted one complaint case against
petitioners as such petitioners have antecedent of one criminal
case. It is further submitted that the complainant concealing the
fact that petitioner no. 1 is bhaisur and peittioner no. 2 is her
nephew has instituted the case alleging that while she was
coming back home after withdrawing an amount of Rs. 10,000/-
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37574 of 2025(2) dt.25-06-2025
2/2
when she was intercepted by the accused persons including the
petitioner and they forcefully snatched rupees ten thousand and
even disrobed her. It is further submitted that since the
petitioners are having dispute with the husband of the
complainant as such the instant false case came to be instituted.
4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for
anticipatory bail of the petitioners.
5. Considering the submissions made by the learned
counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the
event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court
within a period of six weeks from today, be released on
anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-
(Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like
amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where
the case is pending/successor court in connection with
Complaint Case No. 130(C) of 2022, subject to the conditions as
laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
Raj Ranjan/-
U T