Yumnam Bimolchand Singh & 29 Ors vs Laishram Bheigyashree Devi on 20 December, 2024

0
20

Manipur High Court

Yumnam Bimolchand Singh & 29 Ors vs Laishram Bheigyashree Devi on 20 December, 2024

Author: A. Guneshwar Sharma

Bench: A. Guneshwar Sharma

NINGOM Digitally  signed
         by NINGOMBAM
                                                                                      Item No. 84
BAM      VICTORIA
         Date: 2024.12.21
VICTORIA 10:14:57 +05'30'             IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR
                                                AT IMPHAL

                                         CONT. CAS(C) No. 94 of 2024

                          Yumnam Bimolchand Singh & 29 Ors.
                                                                           ...Petitioners
                                                      - Versus -
                          Laishram Bheigyashree Devi.
                                                                          ...Respondent

                                            B EF O R E
                             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. GUNESHWAR SHARMA

                                                   ORDER

20-12-2024

Present Mr. N. Jotendro, learned senior counsel assisted by Md. Syed
Murtaza Ahmed, learned counsel on behalf of the petitioners and
Mr. Th. Monish, learned counsel for the respondent.

During the course of hearing, Mr. Th. Monish, learned counsel for the
respondent, informed this Court that the respondent, Administrative Officer
(Power), Electricity Department, Manipur, issued an Office Order No. 20
dated 28-11-2024 whereby the direction of the order dated 13-06-2024
passed by this Court in WP(C) No. 395 of 2024 has already been complied
with by disposing of the case of 208 Assistant Linemen in EDM for promotion
to the post of Lineman. It is submitted that the contempt case can be closed.

However, Mr. N. Jotendro, learned senior counsel for the petitioners,
submits that the list of 208 Assistant Linemen in EDM who are considered
for promotion to the post of Lineman has not been furnished to the
petitioners.

Accordingly, the contempt case is closed with a direction to the
respondent to furnish list of 208 Assistant Linemen in EDM who are
considered for promotion to the post of Lineman to the petitioners within a
period of one week.

JUDGE
Victoria

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here